Opens in a new tab

Network System v Qualcomm (CoA, UPC_CoA_72/2026, 17 August 2026)

Date17 August 2026
CourtCoA
DivisionLuxembourg (LU)
Type of actionAppeal
Case number(s)UPC_CoA_72/2026
Registry referenceUPC-COA-0000072/2026
PartiesNetwork System Technologies LLC v. Qualcomm Incorporated, Qualcomm Technologies, Inc., Qualcomm Germany GmbH

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source
Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language
not recorded
Translation available
no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked
not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

  • UPC_CoA_72/2026 official number

Follow this case

Parties

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

  1. 15 July 2026 Network System v Qualcomm (CoA, UPC_CoA_72/2026, 15 July 2026) Appeal · UPC_CoA_72/2026
  2. 17 August 2026 Network System v Qualcomm (CoA, UPC_CoA_72/2026, 17 August 2026) Appeal · UPC_CoA_72/2026
  3. 9 October 2026 Network System v Qualcomm (CoA, UPC_CoA_71/2026, 9 October 2026) Appeal · UPC_CoA_72/2026 · appeal, first-instance number cited in the decision

    La cour d’appel déclare recevables mais mal fondées les demandes de restitutio in integrum de Network System Technologies, faute pour elle d’avoir fait preuve de toute la vigilance requise.

  4. 9 October 2026 Network System v Qualcomm (CoA, UPC_CoA_72/2026, 9 October 2026) Appeal · UPC_CoA_72/2026

    La cour d’appel refuse le relevé de forclusion : le rejet des demandes de production de preuves figurant dans les motifs constitue une ordonnance à attaquer dans les quinze jours, l’absence de reprise au dispositif n’étant qu’une erreur matérielle.

  5. 22 October 2026 Network System Technologies v Qualcomm (CoA, UPC_CoA_72/2026, 22 October 2026) Appeal · UPC_CoA_72/2026

    La juge-rapporteure de la cour d’appel rappelle que les ordonnances de confidentialité de première instance non frappées d’appel, ou confirmées en appel, continuent de s’appliquer en appel, et enjoint à Qualcomm de préciser au plus tard le 26 octobre 2026 à qui peuvent être communiqués ses mémoires en réponse et appels…

What the record states

Nature of the act
Appeal
Appeal
Decision of the Court of Appeal.
Instance
Court of Appeal decision.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.

Follow

Weekly summary, on Fridays.