Luxembourg (LU)

Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Luxembourg (LU)" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.

Find a decision in three steps

  1. 1. SearchEnter a party name, case number or keyword.
  2. 2. RefineUse the filters to refine your search, then select Filter.
  3. 3. ReadOpen a title. The “Decision with commentary” badge identifies a case note by the firm.
Scope, method and reading key

UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.

545 decisions recorded

Siemens Healthineers v Hologic (CoA, 15 July 2026)

15 July 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal Decision with commentary

In an order of 15 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_93/2026, EP 2 352 431), the Court of Appeal rejected the application by Siemens Healthineers and its affiliates for suspensive effect of their appeal against the Düsseldorf Local Division's decision of 10 June 2026, which…

Read the analysis

Amazon.com v InterDigital VC Holdings (CoA, 15 July 2026)

15 July 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal Decision with commentary

In an order of 15 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_936/2025), the Court of Appeal permitted InterDigital, with Amazon's consent, to withdraw its application for provisional measures and declared closed Amazon's appeal against the Mannheim Local Division's order of 22 December 2025, which had rejected…

Read the analysis

Network System Technologies v Qualcomm (CoA, 15 July 2026)

15 July 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal Decision with commentary

In an order of 15 July 2026 common to the five appeals UPC_CoA_68/2026 to UPC_CoA_72/2026 against the Munich Local Division's decisions of 11 March 2026 in the dispute between Network System Technologies LLC (NST) and Qualcomm, the judge-rapporteur of the Court of…

Read the analysis

Xingi v Avient Protective Materials (CoA, 14 July 2026)

14 July 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal Decision with commentary

In an order of 14 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_76/2026, EP 2 791 402), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal extended until service of the appeal decision the suspensive effect granted on 26 May 2026 to Xingi Technology and Jiangsu Jiuzhou Xingji against…

Read the analysis

Fujifilm v Kodak (CoA, UPC_CoA_474/2025, 13 July 2026)

13 July 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.1 Decision with commentary

In a decision of 13 July 2026, the Court of Appeal ruled on joined appeals UPC_CoA_473/2025 and UPC_CoA_474/2025 (German designation) and UPC_CoA_873/2025 and UPC_CoA_881/2025 (UK designation) in the dispute between Fujifilm Corporation and the Kodak companies over EP 3 476 616 (lithographic…

Read the analysis

TIRU v VEOLIA PROPRETE (CoA, 13 July 2026)

13 July 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Withdrawal (RoP265) Decision with commentary

In a decision of 13 July 2026, given in the three joined appeal proceedings PR-UPC-CoA-79/2026, 80/2026 and 81/2026 (including the present one, UPC_CoA_79/2026, against Veolia Propreté), the Court of Appeal grants the withdrawal of TIRU's appeals against the decision of the Paris…

Read the analysis

Adobe v KEEEX (CoA, 10 July 2026)

10 July 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Request for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3) Decision with commentary

In an order of 10 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_95/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal rejects the request for discretionary review lodged by Adobe Inc. and Adobe Systems Software Ireland against the order of the Paris Local Division of 1 June…

Read the analysis

AIM Sport Development v TGI Sport Suomi (CoA, 8 July 2026)

8 July 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.1 Decision with commentary

In an order of 8 July 2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal held that the court fees paid by AIM Sport Development AG for its appeal against the Helsinki Local Division's order of 29 April 2026 (ACT_551054/2023, EP 3 295…

Read the analysis

Bekaert Combustion v Polidoro (CoA, UPC_CoA_30/2026, 6 July 2026)

6 July 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Withdrawal (RoP265) Decision with commentary

In a decision of 6 July 2026, given in joined appeal proceedings UPC_CoA_29/2026 and UPC_CoA_30/2026, the Court of Appeal permits the withdrawal of the appeals brought by Bekaert Combustion Technology and NV Bekaert against the decision of the Mannheim Local Division of…

Read the analysis

Rematec v Europe Forestry (CoA, 3 July 2026)

3 July 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Application Rop 333 Decision with commentary

In an order of 3 July 2026, given in joined appeal proceedings UPC_CoA_302/2025 and UPC_CoA_305/2025, the Court of Appeal rejects Rematec's application under Rule 333 for review of the judge-rapporteur's order of 30 March 2026.

Read the analysis

*** v AMYCEL (CoA, 2 July 2026)

2 July 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Generic application Decision with commentary

In an order of 2 July 2026 (UPC_CoA_935/2025), the Court of Appeal orders the appellant, a natural person doing business in Poland whose name is redacted, to provide security of EUR 28,000 for the costs of AMYCEL, LLC within three weeks of…

Read the analysis

IPG Laser v TRUMPF Laser UK (CoA, UPC_CoA_59/2026, 1 July 2026)

1 July 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Withdrawal (RoP265) Decision with commentary

In a decision of 1 July 2026 in the joined appeal proceedings PR-UPC-CoA-58/2026 and PR-UPC-CoA-59/2026, the Court of Appeal allows IPG Laser to withdraw its appeals against the Mannheim Local Division decision of 24 February 2026 (EP 2 951 625), declares the…

Read the analysis

Nera Innovations v Xiaomi Communications (CoA, 30 June 2026)

30 June 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Other Decision with commentary

By order of 30 June 2026, made in appeals UPC_CoA_692/2025 and UPC_CoA_854/2025 against the decision of the Hamburg Local Division of 10 July 2025 concerning EP 2 642 632, the Court of Appeal disregards a private expert opinion and a handbook extract…

Read the analysis

Huawei v Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan (CoA, 29 June 2026)

29 June 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Application RoP262.1 (b) Decision with commentary

Decisions of the judge-rapporteur on public access to written pleadings and evidence under Rule 262.1(b) RoP are subject to review by the panel under Rule 333, whose notion of a case management decision or order calls for a broad interpretation (para.

Read the analysis

Suinno Mobile & AI Licensing v Microsoft (CoA, 29 June 2026)

29 June 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Application to leave to appeal a cost decision (RoP221) Decision with commentary

The standing judge of the Court of Appeal refused Suinno leave to appeal, under Rule 221 RoP, the cost decision of the Paris Central Division of 31 March 2026, which had awarded Microsoft EUR 300,000 out of a claimed EUR 360,940.60 following…

Read the analysis

VALEO SYSTEMES D’ESSUYAGE v ROBERT BOSCH FRANCE (CoA, 22 June 2026)

22 June 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.2 Decision with commentary

The Court of Appeal sets aside two orders of the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Central Division, which had declined jurisdiction and referred to the Düsseldorf Local Division the infringement action brought by Valeo Systèmes d'Essuyage against six Bosch group companies, including a…

Read the analysis

Speed Care Mineral v Teleflex Life Sciences II (CoA, 10 June 2026)

10 June 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Request for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3) Decision with commentary

In an order of 10 June 2026 (UPC_CoA_85/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal dismisses Speed Care Mineral's request for discretionary review of the EUR 1 million value set for the counterclaim for revocation by the Hamburg Local Division in…

Read the analysis

SharkNinja Operating v Groupe SEB France (CoA, 10 June 2026)

10 June 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.1 Decision with commentary

In an order of 10 June 2026, given in appeal UPC_CoA_61/2026 brought by SharkNinja against the refusal of provisional measures by the Paris Local Division on 10 April 2026, the UPC Court of Appeal (panel presided over by Judge Kalden, with Judge…

Read the analysis

Kodak v Fujifilm (CoA, UPC_CoA_312/2025, 2 June 2026)

2 June 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.1 Decision with commentary

In its decision of 2 June 2026 on joined appeals UPC_CoA_312/2025, UPC_CoA_333/2025, UPC_CoA_880/2025 and UPC_CoA_882/2025, the Court of Appeal sets aside both decisions of the Mannheim Local Division that had found Kodak GmbH, Kodak Graphic Communications GmbH and Kodak Holding GmbH liable…

Read the analysis

Hurom v NUC Electronics (CoA, 26 May 2026)

26 May 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Withdrawal (RoP265) Decision with commentary

By decision of 26 May 2026 (UPC_CoA_916/2025), the Court of Appeal permitted Hurom to withdraw its appeal against the decision of the Mannheim Local Division of 2 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_162/2024) in its dispute with NUC Electronics over EP 2 028 981, declared…

Read the analysis

Advanced Standard Communication v Motorola Mobility (CoA, 26 May 2026)

26 May 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Request for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3) Decision with commentary

By order of 26 May 2026 (UPC_CoA_74/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal rejected Advanced Standard Communication LLC's (ASC) request for discretionary review of the order of 24 April 2026 in which the panel of the Munich Local Division required…

Read the analysis

Advanced Standard Communication v XIAOMI (CoA, 19 May 2026)

19 May 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Request for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3) Decision with commentary

By order of 19 May 2026 (UPC_CoA_67/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal rejected the request for discretionary review and the application for suspensive effect lodged by Advanced Standard Communication LLC (ASC) against the Munich Local Division's order of 23…

Read the analysis

ADOBE v KEEEX (CoA, 8 May 2026)

8 May 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Request for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3) Decision with commentary

In an order of 8 May 2026 (UPC_CoA_35/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal rejects Adobe's request for discretionary review (Rule 220.3 RoP) of the Paris Local Division's refusal to dismiss, under Rule 334(h) RoP, KEEEX's claims concerning non-UPC parts…

Read the analysis

Adobe v KEEEX (CoA, 30 April 2026)

30 April 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.2 Decision with commentary

In an order of 30 April 2026 (UPC_CoA_1/2026), the Court of Appeal dismisses as wholly inadmissible Adobe's immediate appeal against the Paris Local Division's order of 19 December 2025 setting at EUR 50,000 the security for costs to be provided by KEEEX…

Read the analysis

Optopol Technology v Topcon (CoA, 28 April 2026)

28 April 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Request for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3) Decision with commentary

In an order of 28 April 2026 (UPC_CoA_56/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal dismisses Optopol's request for discretionary review of the Düsseldorf Local Division's order of 1 April 2026.

Read the analysis

Niche Biomedical v ONWARD Medical (CoA, 27 April 2026)

27 April 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Application For Costs Decision with commentary

In a decision of 27 April 2026 (UPC_CoA_60/2026), the presiding judge and rapporteur of the Court of Appeal allows, by analogy with Rule 265.1 RoP, the withdrawal of the application for the determination of costs (Rule 151) filed the same day by…

Read the analysis

Merz Pharmaceuticals v Viatris Santé (CoA, 27 April 2026)

27 April 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.1 Decision with commentary

By order of 27 April 2026 (UPC_CoA_917/2025), the Court of Appeal sets aside the Paris Local Division order of 21 November 2025, which had refused Merz’s application for provisional measures as out of time, and prohibits Viatris Santé, in France and until…

Read the analysis

Abbott Diabetes Care v Sinocare (CoA, 17 April 2026)

17 April 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.1 Decision with commentary

By order of 17 April 2026 (UPC_CoA_901/2025), the Court of Appeal holds admissible and well founded the appeal brought by Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. against the order of The Hague Local Division of 22 October 2025, which had refused its application for…

Read the analysis

Guardant Health v Sophia Genetics (CoA, 17 April 2026)

17 April 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Application to leave to appeal a cost decision (RoP221) Decision with commentary

By an order of 17 April 2026 (UPC_CoA_49/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal grants Guardant Health leave to appeal the Paris Local Division's order of 16 March 2026, which had ordered it to pay EUR 600,000 in representation costs…

Read the analysis

Belkin International v Koninklijke Philips (CoA, 16 April 2026)

16 April 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.1 Decision with commentary

By order of 16 April 2026 (UPC_CoA_54/2026), the Court of Appeal rejects the requests of Belkin International Inc., Belkin B.V. and Belkin Limited for an extension of the time limit to provide the information required by Rule 225(e) or, in the alternative,…

Read the analysis

La Siddhi Consultancy v Athena Pharmaceutiques (CoA, 14 April 2026)

14 April 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Application Rop 223 Decision with commentary

By an order of 14 April 2026 (UPC_CoA_48/2026), the Court of Appeal rejects La Siddhi Consultancy's application for suspensive effect against the Milan Central Division's order of 13 March 2026, which required it to provide EUR 75,000 security for costs in its…

Read the analysis

VALEO SYSTEMES D’ESSUYAGE v ROBERT BOSCH FRANCE (CoA, 3 April 2026)

3 April 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Simultaneous Interpretation Decision with commentary

By order of 3 April 2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal dismisses the request for simultaneous French/English interpretation made by the Bosch companies, respondents in Valeo Systèmes d’essuyage’s joined appeals (UPC_CoA_4/2026 and UPC_CoA_13/2026) against the orders of the Paris Central…

Read the analysis

Amazon.com v InterDigital VC Holdings (CoA, 30 March 2026)

30 March 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.2 Decision with commentary

In an order of 30 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_12/2026), the Court of Appeal sets aside the orders of the Mannheim Local Division of 27 November 2025 and 16 January 2026 and allows Amazon to take notes of the audio recording of a hearing…

Read the analysis

Sinocare v Abbott Diabetes Care (CoA, 30 March 2026)

30 March 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.1 Decision with commentary

By order of 30 March 2026, the Court of Appeal rules on the appeal of Sinocare and A. Menarini Diagnostics against the order of The Hague Local Division of 17 October 2025, which, at the request of Abbott Diabetes Care, had granted…

Read the analysis

Rematec v Europe Forestry (CoA, 30 March 2026)

30 March 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Application For Costs Decision with commentary

In an order of 30 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_302/2025 and UPC_CoA_305/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal dismisses Rematec's request to refer its cost-fixing application to the Mannheim Local Division with an instruction that the Court of Appeal filing date count as…

Read the analysis

NUC Electronics Europe v Hurom (CoA, 27 March 2026)

27 March 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.1 Decision with commentary

In a decision of 27 March 2026 in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_409/2025, UPC_CoA_410/2025 and UPC_CoA_420/2025, the Court of Appeal sets aside the two orders of 11 March 2025 in which the Mannheim Local Division had found infringement of EP 2 028 981…

Read the analysis

ONWARD Medical v Niche Biomedical (CoA, 27 March 2026)

27 March 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.1 Decision with commentary

By order of 27 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_898/2025), the UPC Court of Appeal (Judges Voß, presiding and judge rapporteur, van den Broek, Sabotier, and technically qualified Judges Elmeros and Schenkl) dismissed ONWARD Medical's appeal against the Munich Local Division's refusal of provisional measures…

Read the analysis

SANOFI-AVENTIS DEUTSCHLAND v AMGEN (CoA, 25 March 2026)

25 March 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Withdrawal (RoP265) Decision with commentary

By decision of 25 March 2026, the Court of Appeal permits, with Amgen’s consent, the withdrawal of the applications for rehearing filed by Sanofi and Regeneron against the decision of 25 November 2025 that had set aside the revocation of EP 3…

Read the analysis

Sanofi Biotechnology v Amgen (CoA, 24 March 2026)

24 March 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.1 Decision with commentary

In a decision of 24 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_641/2025), the UPC Court of Appeal allowed Sanofi Biotechnology SAS and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. to withdraw their appeal against the Düsseldorf Local Division decision of 13 May 2025 (UPC_CFI_505/2023, EP 3 536 712), which dismissed…

Read the analysis

Amgen v Sanofi Biotechnology (CoA, 24 March 2026)

24 March 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.1 Decision with commentary

In a decision of 24 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_646/2025), the UPC Court of Appeal allowed Amgen N.V. and six other Amgen companies to withdraw their appeal against the Düsseldorf Local Division decision of 13 May 2025 (UPC_CFI_505/2023, EP 3 536 712), insofar as…

Read the analysis

Applicant *** v Amycel (CoA, 24 March 2026)

24 March 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Application Rop 223 Decision with commentary

In an order of 24 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_935/2025), the Court of Appeal declares inadmissible the second application for suspensive effect filed by the appellant, the defendant found liable by default by The Hague Local Division on 21 October 2025 for infringing Amycel's…

Read the analysis

EOFLOW v Insulet (CoA, 18 March 2026)

18 March 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.2 Decision with commentary

In an order of 18 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_930/2025), the UPC Court of Appeal dismissed EOFlow Co., Ltd.'s appeal against the Milan Central Division order of 4 December 2025 (UPC_CFI_1167/2025), which had refused to treat as confidential under Rule 262.2 business information disclosed…

Read the analysis

Ecovacs Robotics v Roborock (HK) (CoA, 16 March 2026)

16 March 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.1 Decision with commentary

By an order of 16 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_3/2026), the Court of Appeal rejected Ecovacs Robotics' appeal against the Düsseldorf Local Division's order of 19 December 2025 which, on Roborock (HK)'s request for review, had revoked the ex parte order for inspection and…

Read the analysis

A. Menarini Diagnostics v F. Hoffmann-La Roche (CoA, 11 March 2026)

11 March 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.1 Decision with commentary

In a decision of 11 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_934/2025), the UPC Court of Appeal allowed F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG and Roche Diabetes Care GmbH, following a settlement, to withdraw their application for provisional measures based on EP 1 962 668, which the Düsseldorf…

Read the analysis

Angelalign France Technology v Align Technology (CoA, 10 March 2026)

10 March 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Request for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3) Decision with commentary

By an order of 10 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_37/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal dismissed the request for discretionary review (Rule 220.3 RoP) filed by the Angelalign companies against the Düsseldorf Local Division's order of 26 February 2026 which, in…

Read the analysis

Black Sheep Retail Products v HL Display (CoA, 6 March 2026)

6 March 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Withdrawal (RoP265) Decision with commentary

In a decision of 6 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_895/2025 and UPC_CoA_896/2025), the Court of Appeal permitted Black Sheep Retail Products, with HL Display's consent, to withdraw its appeal against the Hague Local Division's decision of 10 October 2025 (EP 2 432 351) and…

Read the analysis

Hurom v NUC Electronics (CoA, 4 March 2026)

4 March 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Generic Order Decision with commentary

In an order of 4 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_678/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal rejected Hurom's request to file a further reply after NUC's Statement of Response and cross-appeal, in the appeal against the Paris Local Division decision of 23 May…

Read the analysis

Sibio v Abbott Diabetes Care (CoA, 27 February 2026)

27 February 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Generic Order Decision with commentary

In an order of 27 February 2026 (UPC_CoA_884/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the UPC Court of Appeal rejected Sibio Technology Limited's request under Rule 36 for a further exchange of written pleadings in its appeal against the Paris Central Division's dismissal of its…

Read the analysis

EOFlow v Insulet (CoA, 26 February 2026)

26 February 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Request for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3) Decision with commentary

By order of 26 February 2026 (UPC_CoA_34/2026), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal dismissed as inadmissible EOFlow's request for discretionary review and its auxiliary request for leave to appeal.

Read the analysis