Hurom v NUC Electronics (CoA, 26 May 2026)
| Date | 26 May 2026 |
|---|---|
| Court | CoA |
| Division | Luxembourg (LU) |
| Type of action | Withdrawal (RoP265) |
| Registry reference | UPC-CoA-916/2025 |
| Parties | Hurom Co., Ltd. v. NUC Electronics Co., Ltd |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By decision of 26 May 2026 (UPC_CoA_916/2025), the Court of Appeal permitted Hurom to withdraw its appeal against the decision of the Mannheim Local Division of 2 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_162/2024) in its dispute with NUC Electronics over EP 2 028 981, declared the proceedings closed and ordered Hurom to bear NUC’s costs in both instances. The decision is worth noting on two points: the absence of a legitimate interest in a decision where the withdrawing party bears the costs, and the temporal application of the amended Rule 370.9 RoP on reimbursement of court fees.
Question
Does a respondent seeking dismissal of the appeal have a legitimate interest that bars withdrawal, and which reimbursement rate applies to a withdrawal applied for in 2026 in an appeal lodged in 2025?
Decision
Withdrawal is possible until a final decision unless the other party has a legitimate interest in a decision, a rule that applies mutatis mutandis to an appellant (paragraph 12). NUC did not comment within the time allowed (paragraph 13) and, even taking its late statement of response into account, there is no legitimate interest since Hurom bears the costs (paragraph 14). The court set the value of the appeal at EUR 75,000 (paragraph 15) and gave effect to Hurom’s undertaking to bear NUC’s reasonable and proportionate costs in both instances (paragraphs 16 and 17). Amended Rule 370.9 RoP, in force from 1 January 2026, applies to applications lodged after 31 December 2025: the withdrawal application, made before the written procedure closed, attracts reimbursement of 50% of the appeal fees rather than 60% (paragraphs 18 to 22).
Key points for practice
- A respondent cannot block a withdrawal where the appellant undertakes to bear its costs.
- Practical point: the reimbursement rate depends on the date of the withdrawal application, the amended Rule 370.9 RoP applying to applications lodged from 2026.
Provisions applied
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 152, 265.1, 265.2(c) and 370.9(b)
- Other provisions
- Administrative Committee decision of 4 November 2025 amending the table of court fees and the Rules of Procedure
- Case law cited
- 10x v Curio, Court of Appeal, 5 July 2024 (UPC_CoA_234/2024), VMR Products v NJOY Netherlands, Court of Appeal, 9 January 2026
Related decisions
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: UPC Court of Appeal.
Dhenne Avocats blog: UPC Appeals: What the Numbers Show.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
UPC_CFI_162/2024Parties
- claimantHurom Co., Ltd.18 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantNUC Electronics Co., Ltd.10 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Withdrawal (RoP265)
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La cour d'appel autorise le désistement de Hurom, met les frais des deux instances à sa charge et limite le remboursement des taxes d'appel à 50 % en application de la règle 370.9 modifiée.
- Appeal
- Decision of the Court of Appeal (first instance cited: UPC_CFI_162/2024).
- Instance
- Court of Appeal decision.
Patents mentioned
EP 2 028 981mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- NUC Electronics Europe v Hurom (CoA, 27 March 2026) cited in this record
- VMR Products v NJOY Netherlands (CoA, 9 January 2026) cited in this record
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Shenzhen Transsion (CFI, 9 September 2026) cites this decision
- ALD France v Nanoval (CFI, 23 July 2026) cites this decision
- Lionra v Cisco Systems (CoA, 17 July 2026) cites this decision
- Tridonic v Inventronics (CFI, 14 July 2026) cites this decision
- Sanofi Biotechnologies v Amgen (CFI, 8 June 2026) cites this decision
- Nokia Solutions and Networks v Zhejiang Geely Holding Group (CFI, 29 May 2026) cites this decision
- Avago Technologies International Sales v Renault Deutschland (CFI, UPC_CFI_629/2025, 28 May 2026) cites this decision
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 2 028 981Juice extractor recorded proprietor: Personne physique (déposant individuel) | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 16 other decision(s): Hurom v NUC Electronics Europe (CFI, ORD_11865/2025, 11 March 2025) · Hurom v NUC Electronics (CFI, ORD_11863/2025, 11 March 2025) · Hurom v NUC Electronics (CFI, UPC_CFI_336/2025, 5 May 2026) · Hurom v NUC Electronics (CFI, UPC_CFI_335/2025, 5 May 2026) · Hurom v NUC Electronics (CFI, UPC_CFI_159/2024, 5 May 2026) · NUC Electronics Europe v Hurom (CoA, 27 March 2026) · Hurom v NUC Electronics (CFI, 2 October 2025) · Hurom v NUC Electronics Europe (CFI, 2 October 2025) | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet · European Patent Register existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically) mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.