Industriebeteiligungs- und Beratungs v Washtower IP (CoA, 3 March 2026)
| Date | 3 March 2026 |
|---|---|
| Court | CoA |
| Division | Luxembourg (LU) |
| Type of action | Withdrawal (RoP265) |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CoA_887/2025 |
| Registry reference | UPC-COA-0000887/2025 |
| Parties | Industriebeteiligungs- und Beratungs GmbH, BEGA-Consult Internationale Handelsagentur GmbH & Co KG, BEGA BBK Sp. z o.o. sp. K and NEG Novex… |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Case timeline
- 24 September 2025 : Industriebeteiligungs- und Beratungs v Washtower IP (CoA, 24 September 2025) UPC-COA-0000887/2025
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
In an order of 3 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_887/2025), the Court of Appeal permitted Washtower, with the agreement of the Bega companies, to withdraw its application for provisional measures at first instance and on appeal, after The Hague Local Division had granted those measures on 11 September 2025 on the basis of EP 3 522 755. Washtower bears the costs and must compensate the injury caused by the measures. The order is of interest for its method of setting the value in dispute of interim proceedings followed by a merits action.
Question
How should the value in dispute be set for provisional measures proceedings ended by withdrawal, where an infringement action on the merits has since been brought?
Decision
The withdrawal was permitted and the proceedings closed. Washtower bears the costs of both instances (Art. 69 UPCA, Rule 265.2(c)) and must compensate Bega under Rule 213.2 (paragraphs 8 to 10). On the value in dispute, the court applied by analogy the guidelines’ method for interim relief not followed by a merits action, namely 66% (paragraph 13). Starting from the agreed value of EUR 1,000,000 for the infringement action, it took the injunction at about 80% and set the value at EUR 530,000 (paragraph 14). The short duration of the measures is already reflected in the 66% reduction (paragraph 15).
Key points for practice
- The guidelines’ 66% rule applies by analogy even where a merits action followed the provisional measures, for the sake of simplicity (paragraph 13).
- Practical point: an applicant withdrawing provisional measures bears not only the costs but also liability to compensate the injury caused by their enforcement (Rule 213.2, paragraph 10).
Provisions applied
- Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
- Arts 62, 63 and 69(1)
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 152.2, 213.2 and 265
- Administrative Committee guidelines on recoverable costs
- Principles I.1, II.1(a), II.1(b) and II.5(b)
Related decisions
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Decisions in the same proceedings
Going further
Lexicon: UPC Court of Appeal.
Dhenne Avocats blog: UPC Appeals: What the Numbers Show.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- claimantIndustriebeteiligungs- und Beratungs GmbH2 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantBEGA-Consult Internationale Handelsagentur GmbH & Co KG2 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantBEGA BBK Sp. z o.o. sp. K and NEG Novex2 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
- 24 September 2025 Industriebeteiligungs- und Beratungs v Washtower IP (CoA, 24 September 2025) Appeal RoP220.1 · UPC_CoA_887/2025 · appeal, first-instance number cited in the decision
Le juge-rapporteur proroge jusqu'au 1er octobre 2025 le délai de dépôt du mémoire exposant les motifs d'appel, au lieu des deux semaines demandées.
- 3 March 2026 Industriebeteiligungs- und Beratungs v Washtower IP (CoA, 3 March 2026) Withdrawal (RoP265) · UPC_CoA_887/2025
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Withdrawal (RoP265)
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La cour d'appel autorise le désistement de la demande de mesures provisoires, met les frais et l'indemnisation au titre de la règle 213.2 à la charge du demandeur et fixe la valeur du litige à 530 000 euros.
- Appeal
- Decision of the Court of Appeal.
- Instance
- Court of Appeal decision.
Patents mentioned
EP 3 522 755mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Industriebeteiligungs- und Beratungs v Washtower IP (CoA, 24 September 2025) cited in this record
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 3 522 755 | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 2 other decision(s): Washtower IP v Industriebeteiligungs- und Beratungs (CFI, 11 September · Washtower IP v Industriebeteiligungs- und Beratungs (CFI, 17 September | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.