Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Appeal RoP220.1" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
87 decisions recorded
In a decision of 2 November 2026 (UPC_CoA_935/2025), the Court of Appeal, presided over by Klaus Grabinski, sets aside the decision by default given on 21 October 2025 by The Hague Local Division against a defendant established in Poland, together with the…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 13 July 2026, the Court of Appeal ruled on joined appeals UPC_CoA_473/2025 and UPC_CoA_474/2025 (German designation) and UPC_CoA_873/2025 and UPC_CoA_881/2025 (UK designation) in the dispute between Fujifilm Corporation and the Kodak companies over EP 3 476 616 (lithographic…
Read the analysisIn an order of 8 July 2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal held that the court fees paid by AIM Sport Development AG for its appeal against the Helsinki Local Division's order of 29 April 2026 (ACT_551054/2023, EP 3 295…
Read the analysisIn an order of 29 June 2026 (UPC_CoA_57/2026), the Court of Appeal partly reverses the order for the production of evidence issued on 10 April 2026 by the judge-rapporteur of the Copenhagen Local Division in Dall Energy's infringement action against Polytechnik (EP…
Read the analysisIn an order of 10 June 2026, given in appeal UPC_CoA_61/2026 brought by SharkNinja against the refusal of provisional measures by the Paris Local Division on 10 April 2026, the UPC Court of Appeal (panel presided over by Judge Kalden, with Judge…
Read the analysisIn its decision of 2 June 2026 on joined appeals UPC_CoA_312/2025, UPC_CoA_333/2025, UPC_CoA_880/2025 and UPC_CoA_882/2025, the Court of Appeal sets aside both decisions of the Mannheim Local Division that had found Kodak GmbH, Kodak Graphic Communications GmbH and Kodak Holding GmbH liable…
Read the analysisBy decision of 27 May 2026 in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_622/2025 and UPC_CoA_623/2025, the Court of Appeal (second panel) ruled on Hefei Xinhu Canned Motor Pump's appeals against the decision of the Düsseldorf Local Division of 8 May 2025, which had found…
Read the analysisBy decision of 22 May 2026 (UPC_CoA_21/2026), the Court of Appeal gave a decision by default against Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy, which had failed to provide the EUR 600,000 security for costs ordered on 7 April 2026 in its…
Read the analysisIn an order of 6 May 2026 (UPC_CoA_900/2025), the Court of Appeal permits, with Occlutech's express consent, the withdrawal of Lepu Medical's appeal against the Hamburg Local Division's order for provisional measures of 21 October 2025 (EP 2 387 951), declares the…
Read the analysisBy order of 27 April 2026 (UPC_CoA_917/2025), the Court of Appeal sets aside the Paris Local Division order of 21 November 2025, which had refused Merz’s application for provisional measures as out of time, and prohibits Viatris Santé, in France and until…
Read the analysisBy order of 17 April 2026 (UPC_CoA_901/2025), the Court of Appeal holds admissible and well founded the appeal brought by Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. against the order of The Hague Local Division of 22 October 2025, which had refused its application for…
Read the analysisBy order of 16 April 2026 (UPC_CoA_54/2026), the Court of Appeal rejects the requests of Belkin International Inc., Belkin B.V. and Belkin Limited for an extension of the time limit to provide the information required by Rule 225(e) or, in the alternative,…
Read the analysisBy order of 30 March 2026, the Court of Appeal rules on the appeal of Sinocare and A. Menarini Diagnostics against the order of The Hague Local Division of 17 October 2025, which, at the request of Abbott Diabetes Care, had granted…
Read the analysisBy order of 27 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_898/2025), the UPC Court of Appeal (Judges Voß, presiding and judge rapporteur, van den Broek, Sabotier, and technically qualified Judges Elmeros and Schenkl) dismissed ONWARD Medical's appeal against the Munich Local Division's refusal of provisional measures…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 27 March 2026 in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_409/2025, UPC_CoA_410/2025 and UPC_CoA_420/2025, the Court of Appeal sets aside the two orders of 11 March 2025 in which the Mannheim Local Division had found infringement of EP 2 028 981…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 24 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_641/2025), the UPC Court of Appeal allowed Sanofi Biotechnology SAS and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. to withdraw their appeal against the Düsseldorf Local Division decision of 13 May 2025 (UPC_CFI_505/2023, EP 3 536 712), which dismissed…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 24 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_646/2025), the UPC Court of Appeal allowed Amgen N.V. and six other Amgen companies to withdraw their appeal against the Düsseldorf Local Division decision of 13 May 2025 (UPC_CFI_505/2023, EP 3 536 712), insofar as…
Read the analysisBy an order of 16 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_3/2026), the Court of Appeal rejected Ecovacs Robotics' appeal against the Düsseldorf Local Division's order of 19 December 2025 which, on Roborock (HK)'s request for review, had revoked the ex parte order for inspection and…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 11 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_934/2025), the UPC Court of Appeal allowed F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG and Roche Diabetes Care GmbH, following a settlement, to withdraw their application for provisional measures based on EP 1 962 668, which the Düsseldorf…
Read the analysisBy order of 6 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_789/2025 and UPC_CoA_813/2025), the Court of Appeal, presided over by Klaus Grabinski, referred four questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union in the dispute between Dyson and Dreame International and Eurep concerning unitary…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 17 February 2026, given in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_302/2025 and UPC_CoA_305/2025, the Court of Appeal set aside in full the Mannheim Local Division decision of 31 January 2025, which had revoked Rematec's EP 2 548 648, concerning a…
Read the analysisIn an order of 17 February 2026 (UPC_CoA_937/2025 and UPC_CoA_938/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal refused the bioMérieux companies, appealing the Milan Central Division decision of 23 October 2025 maintaining Labrador Diagnostics' EP 3 756 767 in amended form, both…
Read the analysisIn an order of 4 February 2026 (UPC_CoA_891/2025), the Court of Appeal dismissed Centripetal Limited's appeal against the Mannheim Local Division's order of 2 October 2025 which, on Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s request for review, had revoked the saisie order based on…
Read the analysisThe Court of Appeal dismisses VMR Products LLC’s appeal against the decision of the Paris Central Division of 27 November 2024 (UPC_CFI_308/2023), which had revoked in its entirety, at the request of NJOY Netherlands B.V., EP 3 456 214 for a vaporizer.
Read the analysisIn a decision of 23 December 2025 (UPC_CoA_691/2025), the Court of Appeal, on the parties' joint request, permitted Lindal Dispenser to withdraw its appeal against the Paris Central Division decision of 29 May 2025 dismissing its revocation action against Rocep-Lusol Holdings (UPC_CFI_202/2024).
Read the analysisIn a decision of 9 December 2025 (UPC_CoA_12/2025, APL_366/2025), the Court of Appeal set aside the order that Bhagat Textile Engineers pay Oerlikon Textile EUR 15,000 in interim damages for reputational harm, and otherwise dismissed the appeal.
Read the analysisThe Court of Appeal upholds the order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 18 August 2025, which had changed the language of the infringement proceedings brought by Innovative Sonic Corporation against OPPO and eight other companies before the…
Read the analysisBy decision of 27 November 2025, the Court of Appeal permits STRABAG to withdraw its appeal against the Vienna Local Division’s decision of 15 January 2025 (EP 2 643 717), following a settlement with SWARCO, and declares proceedings UPC_CoA_70/2025 closed.
Read the analysisIn its decision of 25 November 2025, the Court of Appeal rules on all the appeals between the Meril companies and Edwards Lifesciences concerning EP 3 646 825 (transcatheter prosthetic heart valve with a frame of hexagonal cells).
Read the analysisBy decision of 25 November 2025, given in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_528/2024 and UPC_CoA_529/2024, the Court of Appeal set aside the decisions of the Munich Central Division of 16 July 2024, which had revoked Amgen’s EP 3 666 797 (antibodies against PCSK9)…
Read the analysisAn offer within the meaning of Article 25(a) UPCA is to be interpreted autonomously and in economic terms: it is sufficient that the presentation enables third parties to make a contractual proposal, without contractual terms or a price being specified.
Read the analysisIn a decision of 2 October 2025, given in German in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_764/2024 and UPC_CoA_774/2024, the Court of Appeal sets aside in its entirety the decision of the Düsseldorf Local Division of 10 October 2024.
Read the analysisBy order of 1 October 2025 (UPC_CoA_681/2025), the Court of Appeal rejects Bruker’s appeal against the order of the Munich Local Division of 16 July 2025 which, following a settlement and the withdrawal of the proceedings, had reimbursed only 60% of the…
Read the analysisIn an order of 24 September 2025, the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal extended by three working days, to 1 October 2025, the time limit for Industriebeteiligungs- und Beratungs and three other companies to file their statement of grounds of appeal…
Read the analysisBy order of 15 July 2025 (PC-CoA-002/2025), the Court of Appeal dismissed VALINEA Energie's appeal against the Paris Local Division's order of 24 March 2025 refusing to set aside evidence preservation and inspection measures granted to TIRU without hearing the defendant, on…
Read the analysisBy order of 26 June 2025, the Court of Appeal (Kalden, Simonsson, Rombach, Faget, Papa) disposed of Ballinno's appeal in its provisional measures dispute with Kinexon and UEFA on EP 1 944 067 (UPC_CoA_328/2024).
Read the analysisBy order of 28 May 2025, the Court of Appeal revoked the order of 3 March 2025 by which the Mannheim Local Division had refused Centripetal's application for preservation of evidence and inspection of premises of Palo Alto Networks under EP 3…
Read the analysisBy decision of 26 March 2025 (UPC_CoA_290/2024, APL_31428/2024), the Court of Appeal (Judges Kalden, presiding, Simonsson, Rombach, rapporteur, Roselinger and Schenk) confirmed that Stäubli Tec-Systems must bear the costs of its revocation action against EP 3 170 639, which became devoid of…
Read the analysisBy order of 3 March 2025, the Court of Appeal largely upholds the provisional measures granted on 27 August 2024 by the Munich Local Division to Syngenta, proprietor of EP 2 152 073 on herbicide compositions, against Sumi Agro’s Kagura herbicide.
Read the analysisBy order of 24 February 2025 (UPC_CoA_540/2024, APL_52692/2024), the Court of Appeal (Judges Grabinski, presiding, Blok, Gougé, rapporteur, Augarde and Tilmann) dismissed Biolitec Holding's appeal against the refusal of provisional measures sought against Light Guide Optics Germany and S.I.A.
Read the analysisBy an order of 14 February 2025 (UPC_CoA_382/2024), the Court of Appeal set aside the order of the Hague Local Division of 19 June 2024 that had refused Abbott Diabetes Care provisional measures against Sibio Technology and Umedwings Netherlands (“Sibionics”).
Read the analysisBy order of 16 January 2025 (UPC_CoA_30/2024), given in German, the second panel of the Court of Appeal set aside the Hamburg Local Division's order of 17 November 2023, which had declined jurisdiction over Fives ECL's damages action against REEL, and remitted…
Read the analysisIn an order of 20 December 2024 (UPC_CoA_402/2024), the Court of Appeal dismissed Alexion’s appeal against the Hamburg Local Division’s refusal to grant provisional measures against Samsung Bioepis’s marketing of Epysqli®, a biosimilar of Soliris® (eculizumab), under EP 3 167 888.
Read the analysisIn an order of 20 December 2024 (UPC_CoA_405/2024), the Court of Appeal dismissed Alexion’s appeal against the Hamburg Local Division’s refusal to grant provisional measures against Amgen’s marketing of BEKEMV®, a biosimilar of Soliris® (eculizumab), under EP 3 167 888.
Read the analysisBy order of 3 December 2024 (UPC_CoA_297/2024, APL_32012/2024), the Court of Appeal (second panel, presided over by R. Kalden) set aside the order for provisional measures made by the Munich Local Division on 21 May 2024 in favour of Dyson against SharkNinja…
Read the analysisBy order of 28 November 2024 (UPC_CoA_490/2024, APL_47391/2024, App_61227/2024), the Court of Appeal (second panel, presided over by R. Kalden) closed by a decision by default the appeal against the order for provisional measures made by The Hague Local Division on 31…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 12 November 2024, given in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_489/2023 and UPC_CoA_500/2023, the Court of Appeal held that only a national action brought during the transitional period prevents the withdrawal of an opt-out under Article 83(4) UPCA.
Read the analysisIn an order of 25 September 2024 (UPC_CoA_182/2024), the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal of Mammut Sports Group AG and Mammut Sports Group GmbH against the Düsseldorf Local Division’s order of 9 April 2024, which had upheld the provisional measures granted…
Read the analysisIn an order of 24 September 2024 in three joined appeals (UPC_CoA_298/2024, UPC_CoA_299/2024 and UPC_CoA_300/2024), the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeals of Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications and OROPE Germany against the Mannheim Local Division’s orders of 16 May 2024 refusing to…
Read the analysisBy an order of 18 September 2024 (UPC_CoA_349/2024, APL_38206/2024), the second panel of the Court of Appeal (R. Kalden, presiding judge and judge-rapporteur, I.
Read the analysisIn an order of 18 September 2024 (UPC_CoA_354/2024), the Court of Appeal set aside the order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 18 June 2024 and ruled that the infringement action brought in German by Ona Patents before…
Read the analysisBy order of 5 September 2024 (UPC_CoA_207/2024, APL_24598/2024), the Court of Appeal dismissed Advanced Bionics' appeal against the order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 15 April 2024, which had refused to replace German with English, the language…
Read the analysisBy order of 23 July 2024 (UPC_CoA_177/2024, APL_20002/2024), the Court of Appeal (K. Grabinski, presiding, P.
Read the analysisBy order of 12 July 2024 (UPC_CoA_328/2024), the Court of Appeal (R. Kalden, presiding, I.
Read the analysisBy decision of 13 May 2024 (UPC_CoA_1/2024, APL_8/2024), the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal of VusionGroup (formerly SES-imagotag) against the Munich Local Division's order of 20 December 2023 refusing provisional measures against four Hanshow group companies based on the unitary patent…
Read the analysisBy order of 17 April 2024 (UPC_CoA_101/2024), the Court of Appeal set aside the order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 26 February 2024 and determined English, the language of EP 2 697 391, as the language of…
Read the analysisBy order of 26 February 2024 (UPC_CoA_335/2023, APL_576355/2023), the Court of Appeal, sitting with five judges including two technically qualified judges, set aside the order of the Munich Local Division of 19 September 2023 granting the application for provisional measures of 10x…
Read the analysis