Lindal Dispenser v Rocep-Lusol (CoA, 23 December 2025)

Date	23 December 2025
Court	CoA
Division	Luxembourg (LU)
Type of action	Appeal RoP220.1
Case number(s)	UPC_CoA_691/2025
Registry reference	UPC_CoA_691/2025
Parties	Lindal Dispenser GmbH v. Rocep-Lusol Holdings Limited

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CoA_691/2025 official number

Follow this case

First instance cited in the decision: UPC_CFI_202/2024

Parties

claimantLindal Dispenser GmbH3 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantRocep-Lusol Holdings Limited3 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

29 May 2025 Lindal Dispenser v Rocep-Lusol (CFI, UPC_CFI_202/2024, 29 May 2025) Revocation Action · UPC_CFI_202/2024
La division centrale rejette l'action en nullité et maintient EP 3 655 346 tel que modifié par la première requête subsidiaire, la revendication 5 délivrée étant jugée dépourvue d'application industrielle. Frais à 70 % pour la demanderesse.
23 December 2025 Lindal Dispenser v Rocep-Lusol (CoA, 23 December 2025) Appeal RoP220.1 · UPC_CoA_691/2025 · appeal, first-instance number cited in the decision

What the record states

Nature of the act: Appeal RoP220.1
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary): La cour d'appel autorise le désistement d'appel consenti par les deux parties, clôt l'instance sans décision sur les frais et ordonne le remboursement de 60 % des frais de justice d'appel.
Appeal: Decision of the Court of Appeal (first instance cited: UPC_CFI_202/2024).
Instance: Court of Appeal decision.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Bekaert Combustion v Polidoro (CoA, UPC_CoA_30/2026, 6 July 2026) cites this decision
SANOFI-AVENTIS DEUTSCHLAND v AMGEN (CoA, 25 March 2026) cites this decision
Black Sheep Retail Products v HL Display (CoA, 6 March 2026) cites this decision

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.