Decisions analysed
Find a decision of the Unified Patent Court, consult its official source and identify the firm’s case notes to understand its practical implications.
Find a decision in three steps
- 1. SearchEnter a party name, case number or keyword.
- 2. RefineUse the filters to refine your search, then select Filter.
- 3. ReadOpen a title. The “Decision with commentary” badge identifies a case note by the firm.
Scope, method and reading key
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Advanced search
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
Favourites are kept in this browser only.
Compare two parties or two issues
Coverage actually indexed: 2524 records out of 2524, full text available for 2349 decisions (official PDFs extracted), 0 pending, 32 requiring optical recognition, 126 without a PDF. A search within decision text covers only extracted documents and is not exhaustive. Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus, counts are neither market shares nor success rates.
2,390 decisions recorded
F. Hoffmann-La Roche v Tandem Diabetes Care (CFI, 20 May 2025)
By procedural order of 20 May 2025, the judge rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division granted the application for protection of confidential information filed by three of the defendants (Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc., Tandem Diabetes Care Europe and Rubin Medical) in the…
Read the analysisChint New Energy v JingAo Solar (CoA, 20 May 2025)
By order of 20 May 2025 (UPC_CoA_430/2025), the Court of Appeal rejected Chint New Energy's application for suspensive effect and expedition of its appeal against the Munich Local Division's order of 5 May 2025, which required it to provide security for costs…
Read the analysisDolby International v Roku (CFI, 19 May 2025)
By order of 19 May 2025 (UPC_CFI_58/2025), the Munich Local Division closed the provisional measures proceedings brought by Dolby International against Roku under EP 3 490 258 B1, after Roku had dropped its request for an anti-suit injunction before a US court.
Read the analysisMalikie Innovations v Discord (CFI, 19 May 2025)
By order of 19 May 2025, the judge rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division set 2 July 2025 as the deadline for the statement of defence of both defendants (Discord Inc.
Read the analysisSun Patent Trust v Roku (CFI, 19 May 2025)
By order of 19 May 2025 (UPC_CFI_59/2025, ORD_16028/2025), panel 2 of the Munich Local Division closed the provisional measures proceedings brought by Sun Patent Trust against Roku, Inc., following the anti-anti-suit and anti-anti-enforcement injunction it had granted ex parte on 28 January…
Read the analysis3V Sigma v A.C.E.F. (CFI, 19 May 2025)
By order of 19 May 2025 (UPC_CFI_342/2025), made without hearing the other side, the Milan Local Division granted 3V Sigma, in part, measures to preserve evidence and inspect premises under EP 3 275 872 and EP 3 275 426 (UV filters for…
Read the analysisDDP Specialty Electronic Materials US v Greenchemicals (CFI, 16 May 2025)
By order of 16 May 2025, the judge rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division protected, in the provisional measures proceedings brought by DDP Specialty Electronic Materials US against Greenchemicals under EP 1 957 544 B1 (UPC_CFI_203/2025), financial information contained in the applicant's…
Read the analysisBelparts Group v IMI Hydronic International (CFI, 15 May 2025)
By procedural order of 15 May 2025, the Munich Local Division set the timetable in Belparts Group's action against IMI Hydronic International and IMI Hydronic Engineering for infringement of EP 3 812 870 (UPC_CFI_801/2024, with the counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_392/2025): interim conference…
Read the analysisMaschio Gaspardo v Spiridonakis Bros GP (CFI, 15 May 2025)
By order of 15 May 2025 (ORD_22310/2025), the judge rapporteur of the Milan Central Division ordered, in the action for infringement of EP 1 998 604 brought by Maschio Gaspardo against Spiridonakis Bros, which did not appear (UPC_CFI_513/2024), an on-site inspection of…
Read the analysisTotal Semiconductor v Texas Instruments (CFI, 14 May 2025)
By procedural order of 14 May 2025 (ORD_18861/2025), the judge rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division ruled on Total Semiconductor's request to file a further written submission after Texas Instruments' rejoinder in the action for infringement of EP 2 746 957 (UPC_CFI_132/2024).
Read the analysisCentripetal v Keysight Technologies (CFI, 14 May 2025)
By procedural order of 14 May 2025 (ORD_16635/2025), the judge rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division postponed, until the oral hearing at the latest, the decision on Centripetal's conditional application for leave to amend its case (Rule 263) in its action against…
Read the analysisHisense Gorenje Germany v Corning (CoA, 14 May 2025)
Read the French analysisTOTAL SEMICONDUCTOR v Texas Instruments (CFI, 14 May 2025)
By an order of 14 May 2025 (UPC_CFI_132/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division deferred to the oral hearing of 22 and 23 July 2025 the decision on TOTAL SEMICONDUCTOR's application, filed on 16 April 2025 under Rule 263, to extend…
Read the analysisTCL Deutschland v Corning (CoA, 14 May 2025)
By order of 14 May 2025, issued in the two joined appeals UPC_CoA_423/2025 and UPC_CoA_424/2025, the standing judge of the Court of Appeal dismissed the request for discretionary review filed by Hisense, TCL and LG against the Mannheim Local Division's refusal to…
Read the analysisFranz Kaldewei v Bette (CFI, 13 May 2025)
By order of 13 May 2025, the judge rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division set at EUR 84,950 the costs that Bette must reimburse to Franz Kaldewei following the decision on the merits of 3 July 2024 on EP 3 375 337…
Read the analysisHuawei Technologies v MediaTek (CFI, ORD_18791/2025, 13 May 2025)
By procedural order of 13 May 2025 (ORD_18791/2025), the judge rapporteur of the Munich Local Division classified as confidential information contained in Huawei Technologies' statement of claim against MediaTek, Inc.
Read the analysisHuawei Technologies v MediaTek (CFI, ORD_18799/2025, 13 May 2025)
By an order of 13 May 2025 (UPC_CFI_254/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division classified as confidential the highlighted information in Huawei Technologies' statement of claim in its infringement action against MediaTek (EP 4 142 215).
Read the analysisFUJIFILM v Kodak (CFI, 13 May 2025)
By order of 13 May 2025, the Mannheim Local Division dismissed Kodak's application for rectification of its decision of 2 April 2025 in FUJIFILM's action for infringement of EP 3 476 616, with a counterclaim for revocation (UPC_CFI_359/2023).
Read the analysisSanofi Biotechnology v Amgen (CFI, 13 May 2025)
In a decision of 13 May 2025 (UPC_CFI_505/2023), the Düsseldorf Local Division considers Regeneron’s EP 3 536 712 B1, which claims a composition comprising a PCSK9 inhibitor for use in reducing lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels, asserted together with its exclusive licensee Sanofi Biotechnology…
Read the analysisBallinno v Kinexon Sports & Media (CoA, 12 May 2025)
By order of 12 May 2025 (UPC_CoA_328/2024), the Court of Appeal ruled on Ballinno's appeal against the Hamburg Local Division's orders requiring it to provide security for costs of EUR 56,000 and then dismissing its application for provisional measures against Kinexon and…
Read the analysisSamsung Electronics v ZTE Deutschland (CFI, 9 May 2025)
By order of 9 May 2025, the judge rapporteur Böttcher (Mannheim Local Division) set 3 July 2025 as the uniform deadline for the Statements of defence of the three ZTE group defendants in Samsung Electronics' infringement action on EP 4 050 804…
Read the analysisJingAo Solar v Chint New Energy Technology (CFI, 9 May 2025)
On a request for panel review (Rule 333), the Hamburg Local Division upheld the judge rapporteur's refusal of the application for security for costs brought by Chint New Energy Technology and the Astronergy companies against JingAo Solar, the Chinese claimant in the…
Read the analysisOerlikon Textile v Bhagat Textile Engineers (CFI, 9 May 2025)
By order of 9 May 2025 (ORD_22179/2025), the judge rapporteur of the Milan Local Division set at EUR 77,064.65 the costs that Bhagat Textile Engineers must reimburse to Oerlikon Textile, following the decision on the merits of 4 November 2024, which had…
Read the analysisSanofi (CFI, 8 May 2025)
Read the French analysisSanofi Mature IP (CFI, 8 May 2025)
Read the French analysisGrundfos v Hefei Xinhu Canned Motor Pump (CFI, 8 May 2025)
Decision on the merits of the Düsseldorf Local Division of 8 May 2025 in Grundfos' infringement action against Hefei Xinhu Canned Motor Pump under EP 2 778 423 (centrifugal pump unit) and the counterclaim for revocation (UPC_CFI_11/2024).
Read the analysisHybridgenerator v HGSystem (CoA, 8 May 2025)
In Hybridgenerator's appeal against an order of the Copenhagen Local Division declining to order HGSystem and other companies to pay the penalty payments set in an order of 4 September 2024 (EP 4 238 202, UPC_CoA_233/2025), the Court of Appeal made English…
Read the analysisSanofi v Accord Healthcare (CFI, 8 May 2025)
Read the French analysisBoehringer Ingelheim International v Zentiva Portugal (CFI, 8 May 2025)
The Lisbon Local Division refused Boehringer Ingelheim International's application for provisional measures against Zentiva Portugal under EP 1 830 843 (nintedanib, treatment of fibrotic diseases) and ordered the applicant to pay EUR 92,944.15 in interim costs.
Read the analysisSTADA Nordic (CFI, 8 May 2025)
Read the French analysisYealink (Xiamen) Network Technology v Barco (CFI, 8 May 2025)
The Brussels Local Division dismissed Yealink's application under Rule 353 to rectify the final order of 21 March 2025 issued in the provisional measures proceedings concerning EP 3 732 827 (UPC_CFI_582/2024).
Read the analysisPolidoro v Bekaert Combustion Technology (CFI, 8 May 2025)
By order of 8 May 2025, the judge rapporteur Böttcher (Mannheim Local Division) extended to 19 May 2025, without opposition from the defendants, the time available to Polidoro, claimant in the infringement action on EP 2 037 175 against Bekaert Combustion Technology…
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTeK Computer (CFI, 7 May 2025)
By decision of 7 May 2025, the Milan Local Division allowed, in Ericsson's infringement action on EP 2 727 342 against ASUSTeK, Arvato and Digital River Ireland (UPC_CFI_318/2024 and UPC_CFI_730/2024), Ericsson's withdrawal against Digital River, which is being wound up in Ireland,…
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTEK Computer (CFI, 7 May 2025)
By a decision of 7 May 2025 (UPC_CFI_319/2024 and UPC_CFI_728/2024), the Milan Local Division allowed Ericsson to withdraw its infringement action (EP 3 076 673) against Digital River Ireland, which was being wound up in Ireland, and allowed Digital River to withdraw…
Read the analysisApple Retail France EURL v Ona Patents (CFI, 6 May 2025)
By order of 6 May 2025, the judge rapporteur Thomas (Düsseldorf Local Division) classified as confidential, in Ona Patents' infringement action on EP 2 263 098 against the Apple companies and the counterclaim for revocation (UPC_CFI_99/2024 and UPC_CFI_392/2024), the highlighted information in…
Read the analysisMeril Italy v SWAT Medical (CoA, 5 May 2025)
Read the French analysisMeril v SWAT Medical (CoA, 5 May 2025)
Read the French analysisMeril Life Sciences v SWAT Medical (CoA, 5 May 2025)
Read the French analysisEvac v Shanghai VacDrain Vacuum Drainage Equipment (CFI, 2 May 2025)
By decision of 2 May 2025, the Düsseldorf Local Division confirmed, at the request of Evac and defendants 4 to 6 (S.K. Marine Supplies and two individuals), the settlement concluded between them in the infringement action on EP 1 840 282 and…
Read the analysisOrthoApnea v *** (CFI, 2 May 2025)
On OrthoApnea and Vivisol's application for EUR 92,814.62 in costs following their success in the infringement action on EP 2 331 036 against an individual defendant (UPC_CFI_131/2025), the judge rapporteur Granata (Brussels Local Division) stayed the costs proceedings until the Court of…
Read the analysis10x Genomics v Curio Bioscience (CFI, 2 May 2025)
By a procedural order of 2 May 2025 (UPC_CFI_140/2024, ACT_15774/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division prepares the oral hearing in 10x Genomics’ infringement action against Curio Bioscience on EP 2 697 391 B1.
Read the analysisInterDigital VC Holdings v The Walt Disney Company (CFI, 2 May 2025)
On an application by the Disney companies, defendants in InterDigital VC Holdings' infringement action on EP 2 465 265 (video coding) before the Mannheim Local Division (UPC_CFI_86/2025), the President of the Court of First Instance, Florence Butin, changed the language of the…
Read the analysisInsulet v EOFLOW (CoA, ORD_69078/2024, 1 May 2025)
Read the French analysisAesculap v Shanghai International Holding (CFI, 1 May 2025)
In the provisional measures proceedings brought by Aesculap against Shanghai International Holding Corporation (Europe) under EP 2 892 442 (UPC_CFI_213/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division asked the Presidium of the Court of First Instance to assign a technically qualified judge to the panel…
Read the analysisInsulet v EOFLOW (CoA, UPC_CoA_768/2024, 1 May 2025)
By order of 30 April 2025 (UPC_CoA_768/2024, APL_64374/2024), the Court of Appeal sets aside the Milan Central Division’s order of 22 November 2024 and grants provisional measures against EOFlow, the Korean maker of the EOPatch and GlucoMen Day Pump insulin patch pumps,…
Read the analysisAGFA v Gucci Sweden (CFI, 30 April 2025)
By decision of 30 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_278/2023), the Hamburg Local Division (Judges Klepsch, presiding, Schilling, judge-rapporteur, Lignières and Sarlin, technically qualified judge) dismissed AGFA NV's infringement action against nine Gucci group companies under EP 3 388 490, which concerns the decoration of…
Read the analysisKinexon Sports & Media v Ballinno (CFI, 30 April 2025)
Open the entryJuul Labs International v NJOY Netherlands (CoA, 30 April 2025)
By order of 30 April 2025 (UPC_CoA_328/2025, APL_16780/2025, App_19228/2025), the Court of Appeal stays Juul Labs International’s appeal against the Paris Central Division’s decision of 7 February 2025 which, on NJOY Netherlands’ action, had revoked EP 3 504 990 for eight states.
Read the analysisYunex v SWARCO Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme (CFI, 30 April 2025)
Read the French analysis10x Genomics v Curio Bioscience (CFI, 30 April 2025)
By order of 30 April 2025, the judge rapporteur Thomas (Düsseldorf Local Division) took note of Curio Bioscience's intention to provide samples in 10x Genomics' infringement action on EP 2 697 391 (UPC_CFI_140/2024).
Read the analysisFUJIFILM v Kodak (CFI, 30 April 2025)
In FUJIFILM's infringement action on EP 3 476 616 against three Kodak companies (UPC_CFI_359/2023), the judge rapporteur Böttcher (Mannheim Local Division) allowed only in part the replacement of three of the nine members of the claimant's confidentiality club: two replacements were admitted,…
Read the analysisPowermat Technologies v Anker Innovations Technology (CFI, 30 April 2025)
By order of 30 April 2025, the judge rapporteur Böttcher (Mannheim Local Division) gave effect to the parties' agreement in Powermat Technologies' infringement action on EP 2 481 141 against six Anker group companies (UPC_CFI_197/2025): service is deemed effected on 30 April…
Read the analysisJuul Labs v NJOY Netherlands (CoA, 30 April 2025)
By an order of 30 April 2025 (UPC_CoA_5/2025), the Court of Appeal stayed Juul Labs' appeal against the decision of the Paris Central Division of 5 November 2024, which had revoked its patent EP 3 498 115 at the suit of NJOY…
Read the analysisInterDigital VC Holdings v The Walt Disney Company (CFI, 30 April 2025)
On an application by the Disney companies, defendants in InterDigital VC Holdings' infringement action on EP 2 449 782 (video coding) before the Düsseldorf Local Division (UPC_CFI_87/2025), the President of the Court of First Instance, Florence Butin, changed the language of the…
Read the analysisArcelorMittal v XPENG (CFI, 29 April 2025)
By order of 29 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_583/2024, ACT_54607/2024, ORD_20010/2025), the Paris Local Division (Judge-rapporteur Lignières) permitted ArcelorMittal to withdraw the infringement action it had brought on 18 October 2024 on European patent EP 3 290 200 against seventeen defendants, including XPENG INC…
Read the analysisHand Held Products v Scandit (CFI, 29 April 2025)
By order of 29 April 2025 (ORD_13031/2025), The Hague Local Division allowed, following a settlement, the withdrawal of Hand Held Products' infringement action against Scandit AG and Scandit Inc on European patent EP 4 163 816 (UPC_CFI_562/2024) and of Scandit's counterclaim for…
Read the analysisRoche Diabetes Care v Tandem Diabetes Care Europe (CFI, ORD_20415/2025, 29 April 2025)
Read the French analysisITCiCo Spain v Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktie (CFI, 29 April 2025)
Read the French analysisITCiCo Spain v Bayerische Motoren Werke (CFI, 29 April 2025)
By order of 29 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_98/2025, App_6322/2025, ORD_20395/2025), Judge Catallozzi, presiding judge and judge-rapporteur of the Paris Central Division, rejected an application by Bayerische Motoren Werke for a cost decision against ITCiCo Spain covering only ITCiCo Spain's unsuccessful application to set…
Read the analysisRoche Diabetes Care v Tandem Diabetes Care Europe (CFI, ACT_831/2025, 29 April 2025)
By order of 29 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_11/2025, ACT_831/2025, ORD_11186/2025), Judge Catallozzi, presiding judge and judge-rapporteur of the Paris Central Division, sitting alone, set at EUR 117,741.62 the costs that Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
Read the analysisNera Innovations v Xiaomi Communications (CFI, 28 April 2025)
Read the French analysisASUSTeK Computer v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CFI, ORD_20073/2025, 28 April 2025)
The regime reserved to external counsel and experts only is rejected. Article 58 UPCA and Rule 262A require a fair balance between the parties’ opposing interests, and Rule 262A.6, as interpreted by the Court of Appeal on 12 February 2025, requires that…
Read the analysisASUSTeK Computer v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CFI, ORD_69253/2024, 28 April 2025)
By order of 28 April 2025 (no. 69253/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division set up the protection of confidential information filed by ASUSTeK in Ericsson's infringement action based on EP 3 076 673 (UPC_CFI_319/2024) and in the counterclaim for revocation…
Read the analysisJuul Labs International v NJOY Netherlands (CoA, 28 April 2025)
By order of 28 April 2025 (UPC_CoA_237/2025, APL_13193/2025, App_14082/2025), the Court of Appeal stays Juul Labs International’s appeal against the Paris Central Division’s decision of 17 January 2025 which, on NJOY Netherlands’ action, had revoked EP 3 430 921 for eight states.
Read the analysisASUSTeK Computer v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CFI, ORD_20078/2025, 28 April 2025)
By order of 28 April 2025 (ORD_20073/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division ruled on the protection of confidential information filed by ASUSTeK in Ericsson's infringement action UPC_CFI_318/2024 and in the counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_730/2024.
Read the analysisNicoventures Trading v NJOY Netherlands (CoA, 25 April 2025)
By order of 25 April 2025 (UPC_CoA_7/2025, APL_322/2025, App_13352/2025), Judge-rapporteur Simonsson (Court of Appeal, Panel 2) granted Nicoventures Trading immediate access to five pleadings and exhibits in NJOY Netherlands' appeal against an order of the Paris Central Division of 5 November 2024…
Read the analysisNicoventures Trading v Juul Labs (CoA, ORD_17094/2025, 25 April 2025)
By an order of 25 April 2025 (UPC_CoA_237/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal granted Nicoventures Trading, an opponent before the EPO, immediate access to the statement of appeal and the response to a request for correction filed by Juul Labs…
Read the analysisNicoventures Trading v Juul Labs (CoA, ORD_13786/2025, 25 April 2025)
Read the French analysisRädlinger Maschinenbau v Henle Baumaschinentechnik (CFI, 24 April 2025)
By procedural order of 24 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_738/2024 and UPC_CFI_241/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division extended uniformly to 16 June 2025 the time limits, expiring on 28 May 2025, for Rädlinger Maschinenbau to reply to Henle Baumaschinentechnik's statement of defence and to respond…
Read the analysisSeoul Viosys v Laser Components (CFI, 24 April 2025)
In a decision on the merits of 24 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_440/2023, ACT_588685/2023), the Paris Local Division holds that Laser Components SAS, a French distributor, infringes Seoul Viosys’ EP 3 404 726 (ultraviolet light-emitting device) by importing, offering, placing on the market and…
Read the analysisCUP&CINO Kaffeesystem-Vertrieb v Alpina Coffee Systems (CFI, 23 April 2025)
By procedural order of 23 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_519/2024, UPC_CFI_47/2025 and UPC_CFI_52/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division classified as confidential under Art.
Read the analysisMaxell v Samsung Electronics (CFI, 23 April 2025)
By order of 23 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_196/2025, App_19188/2025, ORD_19329/2025), Judge Zigann, presiding judge and judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division, granted the application of the five Samsung defendants in Maxell's infringement action on EP 2 403 266.
Read the analysisViking Arm v Stanley Black & Decker Sweden (CFI, 23 April 2025)
By order of 25 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_452/2024, ORD_18928/2025), the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division (Judges Johansson, presiding, Härmand, judge-rapporteur, Rinkinen and van der Burg) declared closed, on a joint request, the proceedings comprising Viking Arm's infringement action on EP 3 953 541 against three…
Read the analysisDISH Technologies v AYLO PREMIUM (CFI, 23 April 2025)
By order of 23 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_471/2023, ACT_594191/2023, ORD_598604/2023), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division prepares the hearing of 7 May 2025 in the infringement action on EP 2 479 680 brought by DISH Technologies and Sling TV against six companies,…
Read the analysisMaxeon Solar v Aiko Energy Germany (CFI, 23 April 2025)
By procedural order of 23 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_336/2024 and UPC_CFI_605/2024, ORD_17892/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division (Judge-rapporteur Thomas) decided, before the end of the written procedure, to hear together Maxeon Solar's infringement action on EP 3 065 184 against eight defendants, including Aiko…
Read the analysisLabrador Diagnostics v bioMérieux (CFI, 23 April 2025)
Read the French analysisMalikie Innovations v Nintendo of Europe (CFI, 23 April 2025)
By order of 23 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_537/2024, ORD_13311/2025), Judge-rapporteur Schilling of the Hamburg Local Division confirmed as final the preliminary order of 18 March 2025 protecting under Rule 262A the sales and profit figures filed by Nintendo Co., Ltd.
Read the analysisAmazon Europe Core v Nokia Technologies (CoA, 22 April 2025)
By order of 22 April 2025 (UPC_CoA_835/2024, APL_67638/2024), the Court of Appeal (Judges Grabinski, presiding, Blok and Gougé, judge-rapporteur) dismissed as moot Amazon's appeal against the order of the Munich Local Division of 16 December 2024 refusing to order Nokia Technologies to…
Read the analysisGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals S. (CFI, 22 April 2025)
Read the French analysisOrtovox Sportartikel v Mammut Sports Group (CFI, ORD_7954/2025, 22 April 2025)
Read the French analysisPfizer v GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals (CFI, ORD_18700/2025, 22 April 2025)
By order of 22 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_476/2024, ORD_18700/2025), the Milan Central Division allowed, with the consent of GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, the withdrawal of the revocation action (ACT_45928/2024) and of the counterclaim for revocation (CC_60908/2024, referred by the Düsseldorf Local Division) brought by Pfizer…
Read the analysisShanghai Jinko Green Energy Enterprise Management v LONGi Solar Technologie (CFI, 22 April 2025)
By procedural order of 22 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_119/2025, ACT_7567/2025, ORD_19051/2025), Judge-rapporteur Zigann of the Munich Local Division gave effect to the parties' agreement in the infringement action on EP 4 372 829 brought by Shanghai Jinko Green Energy Enterprise Management and Zhejiang…
Read the analysisAtlas Global Technologies v TP-Link (CFI, 22 April 2025)
Read the French analysisPfizer v GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals (CFI, ORD_18810/2025, 22 April 2025)
By order of 22 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_687/2024, ORD_18810/2025), the Milan Central Division allowed, with the consent of GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, the withdrawal of the revocation action against EP 4 183 412 brought by Pfizer companies and of their counterclaim for revocation, referred by…
Read the analysisOrtovox Sportartikel v Mammut Sports Group (CFI, ORD_7951/2025, 22 April 2025)
By a decision of 22 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_16/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division ordered Ortovox Sportartikel to reimburse EUR 4,866.11 in costs to Mammut Sports Group AG and Mammut Sports Group GmbH, rather than the EUR 9,732.21 claimed, following the…
Read the analysisGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals (CFI, 22 April 2025)
Read the French analysisOrtovox Sportartikel v Mammut Sports Group (CFI, ORD_7946/2025, 22 April 2025)
By an order of 22 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_16/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division classified as confidential the information on the work billed by Ortovox Sportartikel's lawyers (invoice numbers, hourly rates, hours) in the applications for the determination of costs it…
Read the analysisLIFE 365 v HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (CFI, 18 April 2025)
By procedural order of 18 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_358/2023, ORD_7615/2025), the Paris Local Division (Judge-rapporteur Lignières) partly granted LIFE 365 S.R.L.
Read the analysisMeril v Edwards Lifesciences (CoA, 18 April 2025)
By order of 18 April 2025 (UPC_CoA_166/2025), the Court of Appeal rejects the application by Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences for suspensive effect of their appeal against the Munich Local Division’s decision of 15 November 2024, as rectified on 17 February…
Read the analysisScandit v Hand Held Products (CoA, 18 April 2025)
By order of 18 April 2025 (UPC_CoA_520/2024, APL_51079/2024), the Court of Appeal (Judges Grabinski, presiding, Blok and Gougé, judge-rapporteur) refused Scandit a refund of 20% of the fees for its appeal against the provisional measures order of the Munich Local Division of…
Read the analysisLIFE 365 – LIFE365 ITALY (CFI, 18 April 2025)
Read the French analysisKunststoff KG Nehl v Häfele (CFI, 18 April 2025)
By order of 18 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_526/2024, ORD_18972/2025), Judge-rapporteur Kupecz of the Munich Central Division prepared the oral hearing in the revocation action brought by Kunststoff KG Nehl & Co.
Read the analysisFujifilm v Kodak (CoA, 17 April 2025)
By order of 17 April 2025 (UPC_CoA_312/2025 and UPC_CoA_325/2025), the Court of Appeal rejects the application by Kodak Holding, Kodak GmbH and Kodak Graphic Communications for suspensive effect of their appeal against the Mannheim Local Division’s decision of 2 April 2025.
Read the analysisAtlas Global Technologies v Vantiva (CFI, 17 April 2025)
Read the French analysisBioNTech (CFI, 17 April 2025)
Read the French analysisBarco v Yealink (Xiamen) Network Technology (CoA, 17 April 2025)
By order of 17 April 2025 (UPC_CoA_329/2025), the Court of Appeal, sitting as a single judge, rejects Barco’s application for suspensive effect of its appeal (UPC_CoA_317/2025), limited to the costs order, against the Brussels Local Division’s order of 21 March 2025.
Read the analysis