Yunex v SWARCO Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme (CFI, 30 April 2025)
| Date | 30 April 2025 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Vienna (AT) Local Division |
| Type of action | Generic application |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CFI_33/2024 |
| Registry reference | UPC_CFI_33/2024 · App_17662/2025 |
| Parties | Yunex GmbH v. SWARCO FUTURIT Verkehrssignalsysteme Ges.m.b.H., STRABAG Infrastructure & Safety Solutions GmbH |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Case timeline
- 16 January 2025 : SWARCO Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme v STRABAG Infrastructure & Safety Solutions (CFI, 16 January 2025) UPC_CFI_33/2024 · ACT_4261/2024 · ORD_2647/2025
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By order of 30 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_33/2024, App_17662/2025 and App_20565/2025), Judge Schober, presiding judge and judge-rapporteur of the Vienna Local Division, granted Yunex GmbH, a non-party, access to all written pleadings and evidence in the infringement action brought by SWARCO Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme against STRABAG Infrastructure & Safety Solutions on European patent EP 2 643 717, in which Chainzone Technology (Foshan) had intervened. The decision on the merits of 15 January 2025 is under appeal. The order takes a transparency-friendly line: absent any protected interest put forward by the parties, access is granted as requested, subject only to the redaction of personal data.
Question
May a third party obtain access to all pleadings and evidence in proceedings whose decision on the merits is under appeal, where no party objects?
Decision
Yes. Through Rule 262.1(b), the principle of public proceedings in Art. 45 UPCA extends to procedural information held by the Registry, in the public interest in information. Access should therefore generally be granted, particularly where no protected interest of the parties stands in the way. Invited by order of 14 April 2025 to comment by 24 April, the defendant raised no objection, the claimant and the intervener did not respond, and no ground for refusal was apparent. The parties have ten days to notify the Registry of any personal data to be redacted, and access extends only to the redacted version.
Key points for practice
- Practical point: a party wishing to resist third-party access must respond within the time set and identify a specific protected interest, otherwise access will be granted as requested, even while an appeal is pending.
Provisions applied
- Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
- Art. 45
- Rules of Procedure
- Rule 262.1(b)
- Other provisions
- General Data Protection Regulation (no article specified)
- Case law cited
- Court of Appeal, UPC_CoA_404/2023 (date not given in the order)
Related decisions
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Decisions in the same proceedings
Going further
Lexicon: Written procedure (UPC), Court fees and costs (UPC).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- defendantSTRABAG Infrastructure & Safety Solutions GmbH6 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantSWARCO FUTURIT Verkehrssignalsysteme Ges.m.b.H7 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantYunex GmbH4 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
- 16 January 2025 SWARCO Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme v STRABAG Infrastructure & Safety Solutions (CFI, 16 January 2025) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_33/2024
La division locale de Vienne juge le brevet EP 2 643 717 contrefait, prononce interdiction, information, destruction, rappel et dommages et intérêts dans leur principe, refuse la publication et met les frais à la charge de la défenderesse et de l’intervenante.
- 30 April 2025 Yunex v SWARCO Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme (CFI, 30 April 2025) Generic application · UPC_CFI_33/2024
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Generic application
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- L'accès à l'ensemble des mémoires et pièces est accordé au tiers demandeur, faute d'objection et de motif de refus, après occultation des données personnelles signalées par les parties dans un délai de dix jours.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 2 643 717mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- SWARCO Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme v STRABAG Infrastructure & Safety Solutions (CFI, 16 January 2025) cited in this record
Patents and standards
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.