TOTAL SEMICONDUCTOR v Texas Instruments (CFI, 14 May 2025)
| Date | 14 May 2025 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Mannheim (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Amend Document |
| Registry reference | App_18494/2025 · ORD_18870/2025 |
| Parties | TOTAL SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By an order of 14 May 2025 (UPC_CFI_132/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division deferred to the oral hearing of 22 and 23 July 2025 the decision on TOTAL SEMICONDUCTOR’s application, filed on 16 April 2025 under Rule 263, to extend its infringement action against Texas Instruments (EP 2 746 957) to a new product, the AM67x. The defendants may respond on the substance until 11 June 2025. The order sets out the criteria that will govern a late extension of an action to a new embodiment.
Question
How should an application to extend an infringement action to a new product be handled when it is filed after the written exchanges on the merits have closed, a few months before the hearing?
Decision
The judge must weigh the parties’ interests in the light of all the circumstances, in particular whether the new product shares the actual characteristics of the claim features or is a fundamentally different product, which can only be assessed after claim construction and fact-finding. A shared characteristic not previously in issue may not be introduced under the guise of an extension, and late circumstances are disregarded for the originally attacked embodiment too. Deferral does not unduly hinder the defendants, who must analyse the AM67x anyway, and it is not manifest that the requirements of Rule 263.2 are not met, the publication date of 10 December 2024 and the date of market placement may be relevant under Rule 263.2(a). Four weeks, as proposed by the defendants, is a reasonable period. There is no room for a written reply by the claimant.
Key points for practice
- A late extension to a new product is only possible if it shares the features already in dispute. It cannot be used to open a new technical debate.
Provisions applied
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 263, 263.2 and 263.2(a)
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: Written procedure (UPC), Court fees and costs (UPC).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
Parties
- claimantTOTAL SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC9 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Amend Document
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La décision sur l'extension de l'action à l'AM67x est reportée à l'audience. Les défenderesses peuvent répondre au fond jusqu'au 11 juin 2025.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 2 746 957mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 2 746 957Intelligent interrupt distributor recorded proprietor: NXP BV | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 7 other decision(s): TOTAL SEMICONDUCTOR v Texas Instruments (CFI, 9 October 2025) · TOTAL SEMICONDUCTOR v Texas Instruments (CFI, 15 September 2025) · Texas Instruments EMEA Sales v TOTAL SEMICONDUCTOR (CFI, 9 July 2025) · Total Semiconductor v Texas Instruments (CFI, 22 May 2025) · Total Semiconductor v Texas Instruments (CFI, 14 May 2025) · Total Semiconductor v Texas Instruments (CFI, 1 April 2025) · TOTAL SEMICONDUCTOR v Texas Instruments Deutschland (CoA, 14 January 2 | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet · European Patent Register existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically) mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.