DISH Technologies v AYLO PREMIUM (CFI, 23 April 2025)
| Date | 23 April 2025 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Mannheim (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Infringement Action |
| Registry reference | ACT_594191/2023 · ORD_598604/2023 |
| Parties | DISH Technologies L.L.C., Sling TV L.L.C. v. BROCKWELL GROUP LLC, AYLO PREMIUM LTD, AYLO FREESITES LTD, BRIDGEMAZE GROUP LLC, AYLO Billing Lim… |
Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
No case number recorded in this record.
Parties
- defendantAYLO PREMIUM LTD12 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantBRIDGEMAZE GROUP LLC4 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantBROCKWELL GROUP LLC4 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantAYLO FREESITES LTD9 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantDISH Technologies L.L.C11 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantSling TV L.L.C10 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantAYLO Billing Lim2 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
No other decision in the corpus bears the same case number, and no appeal is documented in the corpus to date.
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Infringement Action
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- Le juge rapporteur organise l’audience du 7 mai 2025, énumère à titre provisoire les questions à débattre, fixe la valeur du litige à 10 millions d’euros et demande une estimation des frais.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 2 479 680mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- DISH Technologies v AYLO PREMIUM (CFI, 6 June 2025) cited in this record
- Corning v TCL Deutschland (CFI, UPC_CFI_819/2024, 16 April 2026) cites this decision
Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 2 479 680Method for presenting rate-adaptive streams recorded proprietor: Dish Technologies LLC | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 12 other decision(s): DISH Technologies v AYLO PREMIUM (CFI, 6 June 2025) · DISH Technologies v AYLO PREMIUM (CFI, 16 April 2025) · DISH Technologies v Cloudflare (CFI, 27 March 2025) · DISH Technologies v AYLO PREMIUM (CoA, 9 January 2025) · DISH Technologies v AYLO PREMIUM (CFI, 20 October 2024) · DISH Technologies v Aylo Premium (CFI, ORD_47055/2024, 20 October 2024 · DISH Technologies v Aylo Premium (CFI, ORD_47058/2024, 20 October 2024 · AYLO Premium v DISH Technologies (CoA, 3 September 2024) | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet · European Patent Register existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically) mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.