Appeal RoP220.2

Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Appeal RoP220.2" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.

74 decisions recorded

VALEO SYSTEMES D’ESSUYAGE v ROBERT BOSCH FRANCE (CoA, 22 June 2026)

22 June 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.2 Enriched entry

The Court of Appeal sets aside two orders of the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Central Division, which had declined jurisdiction and referred to the Düsseldorf Local Division the infringement action brought by Valeo Systèmes d'Essuyage against six Bosch group companies, including a…

Robert Bosch doo Beograd v Valeo Systèmes d’Essuyage

22 June 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.2 Enriched entry

The Court of Appeal dismisses the appeal of six Bosch group companies against the order of the Paris Local Division rejecting their preliminary objection to jurisdiction in the action for infringement of EP 4 144 599 brought by Valeo Systèmes d'Essuyage.

La Siddhi Consultancy v Athena Pharmaceutiques (CoA, 1 June 2026)

1 June 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.2 Enriched entry

In an order of 1 June 2026 (UPC_CoA_48/2026), the Court of Appeal dismisses La Siddhi Consultancy's appeal against the order of the Milan Central Division of 13 March 2026, which had required it to provide security of EUR 75,000 for the costs…

Robert Bosch Doo Beograd v Valeo Systèmes d’Essuyage

15 May 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.2 Enriched entry

By order of 15 May 2026 (UPC_CoA_50/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal, after consulting the presiding judge of the first panel, ordered that the oral hearing of 26 May 2026 be conducted in English, without calling into question French as…

Adobe v KEEEX (CoA, 30 April 2026)

30 April 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.2 Enriched entry

In an order of 30 April 2026 (UPC_CoA_1/2026), the Court of Appeal dismisses as wholly inadmissible Adobe's immediate appeal against the Paris Local Division's order of 19 December 2025 setting at EUR 50,000 the security for costs to be provided by KEEEX…

Amazon.com v InterDigital VC Holdings

30 March 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.2 Enriched entry

In an order of 30 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_12/2026), the Court of Appeal sets aside the orders of the Mannheim Local Division of 27 November 2025 and 16 January 2026 and allows Amazon to take notes of the audio recording of a hearing…

EOFLOW v Insulet (CoA, 18 March 2026)

18 March 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.2 Enriched entry

In an order of 18 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_930/2025), the UPC Court of Appeal dismissed EOFlow Co., Ltd.'s appeal against the Milan Central Division order of 4 December 2025 (UPC_CFI_1167/2025), which had refused to treat as confidential under Rule 262.2 business information disclosed…

Vivo Mobile Communication v Sun Patent Trust (CoA, 16 March 2026)

16 March 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.2 Enriched entry

By an order of 16 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_904/2025 and UPC_CoA_905/2025), the Court of Appeal dismissed Vivo's appeals against two orders of the Paris Local Division of 30 October 2025 which, in Sun Patent Trust's infringement actions (EP 3 407 524 and EP…

EOFlow v Insulet (CoA, 4 February 2026)

4 February 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.2 Enriched entry

The Court of Appeal holds inadmissible the appeal by EOFlow Co., Ltd. against the order of the Milan Central Division of 4 December 2025 (UPC_CFI_1167/2025), which, at the request of Insulet Corporation, had imposed penalty payments of EUR 150,000 for non-compliance with…

Viatris Santé v Merz Pharmaceuticals (CoA, 19 December 2025)

19 December 2025 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.2 Enriched entry

The Court of Appeal disposes, under Rule 360 RoP, of the procedural appeal brought by Viatris Santé against the order of the Paris Local Division of 29 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_697/2025), which had disregarded late-filed exhibits in provisional measures proceedings brought by Merz…

Kodak v Fujifilm (CoA, 14 October 2025)

14 October 2025 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.2 Enriched entry

The Court of Appeal sets aside the order of the Mannheim Local Division requiring Kodak to pay EUR 100,000 for failing to comply with the information, destruction, recall and removal orders in the decision on the merits of 2 April 2025 (EP…