Ocado Innovation v Autostore companies (CoA, 11 December 2023)

Date	11 December 2023
Court	CoA
Division	Luxembourg (LU)
Type of action	Appeal RoP220.2
Case number(s)	UPC_CoA_404/2023
Registry reference	APL_584498/2023/ · UPC_CoA_404/2023
Parties	Ocado Innovation Limited v. Autostore companies

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

10 January 2024 : Ocado Innovation v Autostore (CoA, 10 January 2024) APL_584498/2023/ · UPC_CoA_404/2023
8 February 2024 : Ocado Innovation v Respondent (CoA, 8 February 2024) APL_584498/2023/ · UPC_CoA_404/2023

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CoA_404/2023 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantOcado Innovation Limited9 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantAutostore companiesFollow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

11 December 2023 Ocado Innovation v Autostore companies (CoA, 11 December 2023) Appeal RoP220.2 · UPC_CoA_404/2023
10 January 2024 Ocado Innovation v Autostore (CoA, 10 January 2024) Application RoP262.1 (b) · UPC_CoA_404/2023
La cour d'appel rejette comme irrecevables les demandes d'intervention de Mathys & Squire et de Bristows, faute d'intérêt direct et actuel à la solution de l'appel.
8 February 2024 Ocado Innovation v Respondent (CoA, 8 February 2024) Appeal RoP220.2 · UPC_CoA_404/2023
Le membre du public qui demande l'accès au registre au titre de la règle 262.1(b) doit être représenté devant la JUB. La cour lui accorde 14 jours pour constituer un représentant et écarte le mémoire déposé par lui-même.

What the record states

Nature of the act: Appeal RoP220.2
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary): La juge rapporteure rectifie la qualité des parties, invite à conclure sur la représentation de l'intimé, notifie la demande d'intervention, fixe les délais de réponse et propose une audience le 15 février 2024.
Appeal: Decision of the Court of Appeal.
Instance: Court of Appeal decision.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Ocado Innovation v Respondent (CoA, 8 February 2024) cited in this record
Ocado Innovation v Autostore (CoA, 10 January 2024) cited in this record

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.