Opens in a new tab

Audi v Network System Technologies (CoA, 17 September 2024)

Date17 September 2024
CourtCoA
DivisionLuxembourg (LU)
Type of actionAppeal RoP220.2
Registry referenceAPL_25919/2024 · ORD_48916/2024
PartiesAUDI AG v. Network System Technologies LLC

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026

Our analysis

Summary

In an order of 17 September 2024 in three joined appeals (UPC_CoA_217/2024, UPC_CoA_219/2024 and UPC_CoA_221/2024), the Court of Appeal set aside the Munich Local Division’s orders of 23 April 2024 and ordered Network System Technologies to provide security for Audi’s costs of EUR 100,000, EUR 100,000 and EUR 300,000, within three weeks of service. The order allocates between the parties the burden of substantiation regarding the finances of a patent enforcement company.

Question

Under Article 69(4) UPCA and Rule 158, who must establish the claimant’s financial position?

Decision

The Court must determine whether the claimant’s financial position gives rise to a legitimate and real concern that a costs order may not be recoverable (paragraph 7). Once the defendant has credibly presented its reasons, the claimant, which knows its own finances, must challenge them in a substantiated manner (paragraph 8). The Division had imposed too high a standard of proof. Absent any indication of other assets from NST, it should have been assumed that it had none (paragraph 10). The patent portfolio, largely expired or close to expiry and whose value would fall if the actions failed, was not adequate security (paragraphs 11 and 12). Security did not hinder NST’s access to justice (paragraphs 14 and 15), and the parties’ relative financial positions are not as such a criterion (paragraph 16). The amount was set at half the sums requested, as NST had proposed (paragraph 17).

Key points for practice

Provisions applied

Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
Art. 69(4)
Rules of Procedure
Rule 158
Case law cited
No UPC decision is cited.

Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.


Going further

Lexicon: UPC Court of Appeal.

Dhenne Avocats blog: UPC Appeals: What the Numbers Show.

Source and translations

Official source
Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language
not recorded
Translation available
no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked
not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

No case number recorded in this record.

Parties

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

No other decision in the corpus bears the same case number, and no appeal is documented in the corpus to date.

What the record states

Nature of the act
Appeal RoP220.2
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
La cour d’appel ordonne à Network System Technologies de constituer au profit d’Audi des garanties pour les frais de 500 000 euros au total, NST n’ayant pas justifié de ressources suffisantes.
Appeal
Decision of the Court of Appeal.
Instance
Court of Appeal decision.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.

Follow

Weekly summary, on Fridays.