Settlement and withdrawal
Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Settlement and withdrawal" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.
Find a decision in three steps
- 1. SearchEnter a party name, case number or keyword.
- 2. RefineUse the filters to refine your search, then select Filter.
- 3. ReadOpen a title. The “Decision with commentary” badge identifies a case note by the firm.
Scope, method and reading key
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Advanced search
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
Favourites are kept in this browser only.
Compare two parties or two issues
Coverage actually indexed: 2524 records out of 2524, full text available for 2349 decisions (official PDFs extracted), 0 pending, 32 requiring optical recognition, 126 without a PDF. A search within decision text covers only extracted documents and is not exhaustive. Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus, counts are neither market shares nor success rates.
118 decisions recorded
Pirelli Tyre v Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber (CFI, 28 July 2026)
By an order lodged on 28 July 2026 and published on the register on 14 October 2026, the Milan Local Division stayed proceedings UPC_CFI_2297/2026 and UPC_CFI_2300/2026 between Pirelli Tyre and Sichuan Yuanxing Rubber, following a worldwide settlement reported by the parties.
Read the analysisTridonic v Inventronics (CFI, 14 July 2026)
In a decision of 14 July 2026 (UPC_CFI_580/2025, EP 2 011 218), the Düsseldorf Local Division, with Inventronics' consent, permitted Tridonic to withdraw its infringement action, stayed since August 2025 for settlement talks, and declared the proceedings closed.
Read the analysisTIRU v VALINEA ENERGIE (CoA, 13 July 2026)
Read the French analysisTIRU v VEOLIA PROPRETE (CoA, 13 July 2026)
In a decision of 13 July 2026, given in the three joined appeal proceedings PR-UPC-CoA-79/2026, 80/2026 and 81/2026 (including the present one, UPC_CoA_79/2026, against Veolia Propreté), the Court of Appeal grants the withdrawal of TIRU's appeals against the decision of the Paris…
Read the analysisTIRU v MAGUIN (CoA, 13 July 2026)
Read the French analysisBekaert Combustion v Polidoro (CoA, UPC_CoA_30/2026, 6 July 2026)
In a decision of 6 July 2026, given in joined appeal proceedings UPC_CoA_29/2026 and UPC_CoA_30/2026, the Court of Appeal permits the withdrawal of the appeals brought by Bekaert Combustion Technology and NV Bekaert against the decision of the Mannheim Local Division of…
Read the analysisBekaert Combustion v Polidoro (CoA, UPC_CoA_29/2026, 6 July 2026)
Read the French analysisIPG Laser v TRUMPF Laser UK (CoA, UPC_CoA_59/2026, 1 July 2026)
In a decision of 1 July 2026 in the joined appeal proceedings PR-UPC-CoA-58/2026 and PR-UPC-CoA-59/2026, the Court of Appeal allows IPG Laser to withdraw its appeals against the Mannheim Local Division decision of 24 February 2026 (EP 2 951 625), declares the…
Read the analysisIPG Laser v TRUMPF Laser UK (CoA, UPC_CoA_58/2026, 1 July 2026)
Read the French analysisHurom v NUC Electronics (CoA, 26 May 2026)
By decision of 26 May 2026 (UPC_CoA_916/2025), the Court of Appeal permitted Hurom to withdraw its appeal against the decision of the Mannheim Local Division of 2 October 2025 (UPC_CFI_162/2024) in its dispute with NUC Electronics over EP 2 028 981, declared…
Read the analysisAvago Technologies International Sales v Renault Deutschland (CFI, UPC_CFI_673/2026, 21 May 2026)
By order of 21 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_673/2026), the Hamburg Local Division permitted the withdrawal of the infringement action on EP 3 509 263 brought on 20 February 2026 by Avago Technologies International Sales against three Renault companies, which consented, and declared the…
Read the analysisNokia Technologies v Warner Bros. Discovery (CFI, 27 March 2026)
In a decision of 27 March 2026 (UPC_CFI_1390/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division permits, with the consent of the nine Warner Bros. Discovery defendants, the withdrawal of Nokia's infringement action (EP 4 250 732), declares the proceedings closed and orders…
Read the analysisSANOFI-AVENTIS DEUTSCHLAND v AMGEN (CoA, 25 March 2026)
By decision of 25 March 2026, the Court of Appeal permits, with Amgen’s consent, the withdrawal of the applications for rehearing filed by Sanofi and Regeneron against the decision of 25 November 2025 that had set aside the revocation of EP 3…
Read the analysisBlack Sheep Retail Products v HL Display (CoA, 6 March 2026)
In a decision of 6 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_895/2025 and UPC_CoA_896/2025), the Court of Appeal permitted Black Sheep Retail Products, with HL Display's consent, to withdraw its appeal against the Hague Local Division's decision of 10 October 2025 (EP 2 432 351) and…
Read the analysisIndustriebeteiligungs- und Beratungs v Washtower IP (CoA, 3 March 2026)
In an order of 3 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_887/2025), the Court of Appeal permitted Washtower, with the agreement of the Bega companies, to withdraw its application for provisional measures at first instance and on appeal, after The Hague Local Division had granted those…
Read the analysisCorning v Hisense Gorenje Germany (CFI, 18 February 2026)
In an order of 18 February 2026, the Mannheim Local Division permitted Corning to withdraw its infringement action based on EP 3 296 274 (UPC_CFI_819/2024) against Hisense Gorenje Germany and Hisense Europe Holding, and those two companies to withdraw their counterclaim for…
Read the analysisSamsung Bioepis NL v Alexion Pharmaceuticals (CoA, 18 February 2026)
By decision of 18 February 2026 (UPC_CoA_744/2025 and UPC_CoA_750/2025, EP 3 167 888), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal permitted Samsung Bioepis to withdraw its applications for leave to appeal the cost decisions issued by the Hamburg Local Division on…
Read the analysisElectronics and Telecommunications Research Institute v Hisense Gorenje Germany (CFI, 16 February 2026)
In a decision of 16 February 2026 (UPC_CFI_716/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division permitted Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) to withdraw its infringement action against Hisense Gorenje Germany GmbH and five other companies following a settlement, and declared the proceedings closed.
Read the analysisAvago Technologies International Sales v Telefónica Germany (CFI, 11 February 2026)
In a decision of 11 February 2026 (UPC_CFI_1648/2025), given in German, the Düsseldorf Local Division permitted Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited to withdraw, before the written procedure closed, its action for infringement of EP 1 954 091 brought on 19 November…
Read the analysisMaxeon Solar v Aiko Energy Germany (CFI, 11 February 2026)
In a decision of 11 February 2026, made in the infringement action on EP 3 065 184 (UPC_CFI_336/2024) and the two joined revocation counterclaims (UPC_CFI_605/2024 and UPC_CFI_607/2024), the Düsseldorf Local Division allowed the withdrawals that followed a settlement between Maxeon Solar Pte.
Read the analysisAdeia Guides v The Walt Disney Company (Benelux) (CFI, 5 February 2026)
In a decision of 5 February 2026, given in the infringement action on EP 1 969 839 (UPC_CFI_666/2024) and proceedings UPC_CFI_199/2025, the Hague Local Division allowed the withdrawals that followed the settlement between Adeia Guides Inc.
Read the analysisJuul Labs International v NJOY Netherlands (CoA, UPC_CoA_5/2025, 9 January 2026)
The Court of Appeal allows Juul Labs International, Inc. to withdraw its appeal (UPC_CoA_5/2025) against the decision of the Paris Central Division of 5 November 2024 (UPC_CFI_309/2023), which had revoked EP 3 498 115 at the request of NJOY Netherlands B.V.
Read the analysisJuul Labs International v NJOY Netherlands (CoA, UPC_CoA_237/2025, 9 January 2026)
By order of 9 January 2026 (UPC_CoA_237/2025), the Court of Appeal permitted Juul Labs to withdraw its appeal against the decision of the Paris Central Division of 17 January 2025 (UPC_CFI_316/2023), which had revoked EP 3 430 921 for eight states at…
Read the analysisJuul Labs International v NJOY Netherlands (CoA, UPC_CoA_328/2025, 9 January 2026)
By order of 9 January 2026 (UPC_CoA_328/2025), the Court of Appeal permitted Juul Labs to withdraw its appeal against the decision of the Paris Central Division of 7 February 2025 (UPC_CFI_314/2023), which had revoked EP 3 504 990 for eight states at…
Read the analysisVMR Products v NJOY Netherlands (CoA, 9 January 2026)
The Court of Appeal allows VMR Products LLC to withdraw its appeal against the decision of the Paris Central Division of 22 January 2025 (UPC_CFI_310/2023), which had partially revoked EP 3 613 453 at the request of NJOY Netherlands B.V., the patent…
Read the analysisAtlas Global v Vantiva (CFI, UPC_CFI_407/2025, 22 December 2025)
By decision of 22 December 2025 (UPC_CFI_407/2024 and UPC_CFI_686/2024), the Düsseldorf Local Division permitted, with each side's consent, the withdrawal of Atlas Global Technologies' infringement action on EP 3 353 901 against three Vantiva companies and of the counterclaim for revocation, and…
Read the analysisAtlas Global v Vantiva (CFI, UPC_CFI_314/2024, 22 December 2025)
In a decision of 22 December 2025, given in infringement action UPC_CFI_314/2024 and counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_568/2024, the Düsseldorf Local Division permitted the mutual withdrawal by Atlas Global Technologies and the Vantiva companies, each with the other side's consent, concerning EP 3186937,…
Read the analysisHeadwater Research v Apple (CFI, 9 December 2025)
In a decision of 9 December 2025, the Düsseldorf Local Division allowed the withdrawal of Headwater Research's infringement action against Apple and group companies (EP 3 107 243 B1) and of the counterclaim for revocation, each with the other side's consent, and…
Read the analysisCooperSurgical v European Distribution Center Motiva (CFI, 4 December 2025)
In a decision of 4 December 2025, the Brussels Local Division allowed CooperSurgical to withdraw its infringement action (EP 3 302 292 B1), brought while an EPO opposition was pending, and ordered it to pay the defendants' costs: EUR 105,757.90 to European…
Read the analysisLeap Tools v Wizart (CFI, 17 November 2025)
By decision of 17 November 2025 (UPC_CFI_541/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division allowed Leap Tools to withdraw its action for infringement of EP 3 859 566 against Wizart LLC only, that company being unreachable and described as non-existent.
Read the analysisHypertherm v Tec.Mo (CFI, 7 October 2025)
In an order of 7 October 2025, the Milan Local Division, on the parties' joint request, found that Hypertherm's infringement action against Tec.Mo. (UPC_CFI_226/2025) had become devoid of purpose following a settlement, held that there was no need to adjudicate and closed…
Read the analysisCorning v Hisense Gorenje Germany (CFI, 3 October 2025)
In an order of 3 October 2025, the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division allowed Corning to withdraw its infringement action on EP 3 296 274 (UPC_CFI_819/2024) against the three LG Electronics companies, and allowed those companies to withdraw their counterclaim for…
Read the analysisHeadwater Research v Samsung Electronics (CFI, 30 September 2025)
In a decision of 30 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_320/2024), the Düsseldorf Local Division, with Headwater Research's consent, allowed four Samsung companies to withdraw their counterclaim for revocation of EP 3 110 069, declared those proceedings closed and ordered each party to bear its…
Read the analysisHeadwater Research v Samsung Electronics (CFI, 29 September 2025)
In a decision of 29 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_496/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division allowed Headwater Research to withdraw its infringement action on EP 3 110 072, filed on 6 June 2024 against five Samsung companies, which consented.
Read the analysisHeadwater Research v Samsung Electronics (CFI, 26 September 2025)
In a decision of 26 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_26/2024), the Düsseldorf Local Division, with the consent of the four Samsung defendants, allowed Headwater Research to withdraw its infringement action on EP 3 110 069.
Read the analysisEyesmatch v Microsoft (CFI, 12 September 2025)
By a decision of 12 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_486/2025, App_36427/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division, with the defendants' consent, allowed Eyesmatch to withdraw its infringement action against Microsoft Corp.
Read the analysisOerlikon Textile v Himson Engineering (CFI, 9 September 2025)
By a decision of 9 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_240/2023), the Milan Local Division allowed the joint withdrawal of Oerlikon Textile's infringement action against Himson Engineering and of the revocation counterclaim (EP 2 145 848), filed on 22 July 2025, after the hearing of…
Read the analysisOna Patents v Apple (CFI, 5 September 2025)
By a decision of 5 September 2025 in the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_99/2024 and UPC_CFI_392/2024, the Düsseldorf Local Division permitted Ona Patents to withdraw its infringement action against five Apple group companies (EP 2 263 098) and permitted the withdrawal of the counterclaim…
Read the analysisFaro Technologies v PMT Technologies (Suzhou) (CFI, 29 August 2025)
By an order of 29 August 2025 (UPC_CFI_500/2025, ORD_33879/2025), the Mannheim Local Division declared terminated, following Blankenhorn's cease-and-desist undertaking and nil disclosure, the provisional measures proceedings Faro Technologies had brought against it on EP 4 001 835, and ordered it to bear…
Read the analysisDDP Specialty Electronic Materials US v Greenchemicals (CFI, 28 July 2025)
By order of 28 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_203/2025), the Düsseldorf Local Division (Presiding Judge Thomas, Judge Thom as judge-rapporteur, and Judge Rinkinen) permitted DDP Specialty Electronic Materials US to withdraw its application for provisional measures of 7 March 2025 against Greenchemicals, based on…
Read the analysisTruma Gerätetechnik v CAN Srl Airxcel Europe (CFI, 24 July 2025)
By order of 24 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_512/2024 and UPC_CFI_794/2024), the Düsseldorf Local Division (Judges Thom, Schumacher as judge-rapporteur, and Mlakar) permitted, following a settlement, the withdrawal of Truma Gerätetechnik's infringement action against CAN Srl Airxcel Europe (EP 1 788 320 B1) and…
Read the analysisHewlett-Packard Development Company v LAMA France (CoA, 24 July 2025)
By decision of 24 July 2025 (UPC_CoA_24/2025 and UPC_CoA_23/2025), the Court of Appeal (Presiding Judge Grabinski, Judge Gougé as judge-rapporteur, and Judge Germano) granted the reciprocal withdrawals of Hewlett-Packard Development Company and LAMA France, which had each appealed the Paris Local Division's…
Read the analysisVisibly v Easee (CoA, 23 July 2025)
By order of 23 July 2025 (UPC_CoA_526/2025), the Court of Appeal (Presiding Judge Kalden, Judge Rombach as judge-rapporteur, and Judge Simonsson) permitted Visibly, with Easee's consent, to withdraw its appeal against the Hamburg Local Division's order of 30 May 2025 on security…
Read the analysisNanoString (CFI, 16 July 2025)
Open the entryAdvanced Bionics v MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte (CoA, 3 July 2025)
By decision of 3 July 2025 (UPC_CoA_175/2025 to UPC_CoA_178/2025), the Court of Appeal (Judges Grabinski, Blok and Gougé) permitted Advanced Bionics, with MED-EL's agreement, to withdraw its revocation action and its revocation counterclaim against EP 4 074 373, declared the proceedings closed…
Read the analysisAppellant*** v ORTHOAPNEA (CoA, 3 July 2025)
By decision of 3 July 2025, given in Dutch, the Court of Appeal (Grabinski, Blok, Gougé) allowed the withdrawal of the appeal against the Brussels Local Division's decision of 17 January 2025, which had dismissed the infringement actions on EP 2 331…
Read the analysisAdvanced Bionics (CoA, 3 July 2025)
Read the French analysisILME GmbH Elektrotechnische Handelsgesellschaft v PHOENIX CONTACT (CoA, 19 June 2025)
By an order of 18 June 2025 (UPC_CoA_170/2025, EP 3 602 692), the Court of Appeal (Judges Grabinski, Blok and Gougé, rapporteur) dismissed as devoid of purpose, applying Rule 360 by analogy, ILME's appeal against the Munich Local Division's order of 10…
Read the analysisPHOENIX CONTACT (CFI, 5 June 2025)
Read the French analysisPHOENIX CONTACT v Industria Lombarda Materiale Elettrico (CFI, 5 June 2025)
Following a settlement, the Munich Local Division allowed the withdrawal of PHOENIX CONTACT's infringement action on EP 3 602 692 and of the counterclaim for revocation brought by Industria Lombarda Materiale Elettrico and ILME, declared the proceedings closed, left each party to…
Read the analysisVersah v HaeNaem (CFI, 2 June 2025)
The Düsseldorf Local Division allowed the partial withdrawal of Versah's action for infringement of EP 3 402 420 as against Adin Dental Implant Systems GmbH, following a settlement and with that defendant's consent, declared the proceedings closed as regards it, ordered Versah…
Read the analysisNanoString Technologies Europe v President and Fellows of Harvard College (CoA, 28 May 2025)
By decision of 28 May 2025, the Court of Appeal permits NanoString Technologies Europe to withdraw its revocation action against President and Fellows of Harvard College (EP 2 794 928), at the stage of Harvard’s appeal against the Munich Central Division’s decision…
Read the analysisMED-EL v Advanced Bionics (CFI, 28 May 2025)
By order of 28 May 2025, the Mannheim Local Division, following a settlement, permitted MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte to withdraw its infringement action on EP 4 074 373 against three Advanced Bionics companies (UPC_CFI_410/2023), cancelled the date set for pronouncing the decision and…
Read the analysisNJOY Netherlands v Juul Labs International (CoA, 23 May 2025)
By order of 23 May 2025, the Court of Appeal permits, with Juul Labs International’s consent, the withdrawal of NJOY Netherlands’ appeal (UPC_CoA_7/2025) against the Paris Central Division’s decision of 5 November 2024 dismissing its action for revocation of EP 3 504…
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTeK Computer (CFI, 7 May 2025)
By decision of 7 May 2025, the Milan Local Division allowed, in Ericsson's infringement action on EP 2 727 342 against ASUSTeK, Arvato and Digital River Ireland (UPC_CFI_318/2024 and UPC_CFI_730/2024), Ericsson's withdrawal against Digital River, which is being wound up in Ireland,…
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTEK Computer (CFI, 7 May 2025)
By a decision of 7 May 2025 (UPC_CFI_319/2024 and UPC_CFI_728/2024), the Milan Local Division allowed Ericsson to withdraw its infringement action (EP 3 076 673) against Digital River Ireland, which was being wound up in Ireland, and allowed Digital River to withdraw…
Read the analysisArcelorMittal v XPENG (CFI, 29 April 2025)
By order of 29 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_583/2024, ACT_54607/2024, ORD_20010/2025), the Paris Local Division (Judge-rapporteur Lignières) permitted ArcelorMittal to withdraw the infringement action it had brought on 18 October 2024 on European patent EP 3 290 200 against seventeen defendants, including XPENG INC…
Read the analysisHand Held Products v Scandit (CFI, 29 April 2025)
By order of 29 April 2025 (ORD_13031/2025), The Hague Local Division allowed, following a settlement, the withdrawal of Hand Held Products' infringement action against Scandit AG and Scandit Inc on European patent EP 4 163 816 (UPC_CFI_562/2024) and of Scandit's counterclaim for…
Read the analysisViking Arm v Stanley Black & Decker Sweden (CFI, 23 April 2025)
By order of 25 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_452/2024, ORD_18928/2025), the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division (Judges Johansson, presiding, Härmand, judge-rapporteur, Rinkinen and van der Burg) declared closed, on a joint request, the proceedings comprising Viking Arm's infringement action on EP 3 953 541 against three…
Read the analysisAmazon Europe Core v Nokia Technologies (CoA, 22 April 2025)
By order of 22 April 2025 (UPC_CoA_835/2024, APL_67638/2024), the Court of Appeal (Judges Grabinski, presiding, Blok and Gougé, judge-rapporteur) dismissed as moot Amazon's appeal against the order of the Munich Local Division of 16 December 2024 refusing to order Nokia Technologies to…
Read the analysisGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals S. (CFI, 22 April 2025)
Read the French analysisPfizer v GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals (CFI, ORD_18700/2025, 22 April 2025)
By order of 22 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_476/2024, ORD_18700/2025), the Milan Central Division allowed, with the consent of GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, the withdrawal of the revocation action (ACT_45928/2024) and of the counterclaim for revocation (CC_60908/2024, referred by the Düsseldorf Local Division) brought by Pfizer…
Read the analysisPfizer v GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals (CFI, ORD_18810/2025, 22 April 2025)
By order of 22 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_687/2024, ORD_18810/2025), the Milan Central Division allowed, with the consent of GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, the withdrawal of the revocation action against EP 4 183 412 brought by Pfizer companies and of their counterclaim for revocation, referred by…
Read the analysisGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals (CFI, 22 April 2025)
Read the French analysisEricsson v Motorola Mobility (CoA, 11 April 2025)
By order of 11 April 2025 (UPC_CoA_201/2025), the Court of Appeal permits, with Motorola Mobility’s consent, the withdrawal by Ericsson GmbH and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson of their second counterclaim for revocation of EP 3 780 758 and of their appeal against the…
Read the analysisGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals v Pfizer Europe MA EEIG (CFI, 11 April 2025)
By decision of 11 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_468/2024), the Düsseldorf Local Division allowed GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, with the defendants' consent, to withdraw its action against fourteen Pfizer group companies for infringement of EP 4 183 412.
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v AsusTek Computer (CFI, 4 April 2025)
By decision of 4 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_757/2024), the Lisbon Local Division (Judges Lopes, presiding and rapporteur, Granata and Rinkinen) allowed Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson to withdraw its action for infringement and damages (EP 2 819 131) against Digital River Ireland, which an Irish…
Read the analysisEOFlow v Insulet (CoA, 3 April 2025)
By order of 3 April 2025 (UPC_CoA_194/2025), the Court of Appeal, sitting as a single judge, permits with Insulet’s agreement the withdrawal by EOFlow of its application for leave to appeal (Rule 221) against the Milan Central Division’s order of 15 February…
Read the analysisMANN+HUMMEL v SOTRAS (CFI, 1 April 2025)
By order of 1 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_614/2024, ORD_15600/2025), the Munich Local Division allowed MANN+HUMMEL, with SOTRAS's consent and following an out-of-court settlement, to withdraw its application for provisional measures based on EP 2 762 219, and declared the proceedings closed.
Read the analysisHand Held Products v Scandit (CoA, 31 March 2025)
Read the French analysisHand Held Products v Scandit (CFI, 21 March 2025)
Read the French analysisMedac v Sanofi Mature IP (CFI, 19 March 2025)
By order of 26 March 2025 (UPC_CFI_146/2024), the Munich Local Division, in Sanofi's action against STADA for infringement of EP 2 493 466, allowed Medac, a third party, to withdraw its application for access to the file and removed from the file…
Read the analysisHand Held Products v Scandit (CFI, 18 March 2025)
By order of 18 March 2025 (UPC_CFI_73/2024 and UPC_CFI_408/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division granted, on a joint application, leave to withdraw Hand Held Products' infringement action against Scandit on EP 3 866 051 and Scandit's counterclaim, declared the proceedings…
Read the analysis10x Genomics v Vizgen (CoA, 5 March 2025)
By order of 5 March 2025, issued in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_654/2024, UPC_CoA_700/2024 and UPC_CoA_1/2025, the Court of Appeal permits 10x Genomics and President and Fellows of Harvard College to withdraw their three appeals against orders of the Hamburg Local Division that…
Read the analysisPresident (CoA, ORD_6861/2025, 5 March 2025)
Read the French analysisPresident (CoA, ORD_6860/2025, 5 March 2025)
Read the French analysisSharkNinja Italy (CFI, 27 February 2025)
Read the French analysisFapa Vital v Valentis Baltic (CFI, 27 February 2025)
By decision of 27 February 2025 (UPC_CFI_743/2024, ACT_63292/2024, ORD_9485/2025), the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division (Judges Johansson, presiding and judge-rapporteur, Härmand and Knijff) closed the provisional measures proceedings brought by Fapa Vital AG against Valentis Baltic, UAB on EP 1 978 949, following a…
Read the analysisDyson (CFI, 19 February 2025)
Read the French analysisAarke v Sodastream Industries (CoA, 19 February 2025)
By order of 19 February 2025, the Court of Appeal permits Aarke to withdraw its appeal against the Düsseldorf Local Division’s decision of 31 October 2024 finding infringement of Sodastream’s EP 1 793 917.
Read the analysisDyson Technology v SharkNinja Europe (CFI, 19 February 2025)
By an order of 19 February 2025 in the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_322/2024 (infringement) and UPC_CFI_588/2024 (counterclaim for revocation), the judge rapporteur of the Munich Local Division granted leave to Dyson Technology Limited and to SharkNinja Europe Limited and SharkNinja Germany GmbH to…
Read the analysisPer Aarsleff v IMS Robotics (CFI, 17 February 2025)
By an order of 17 February 2025 in the joined proceedings UPC_CFI_495/2024 (infringement) and UPC_CFI_739/2024 (counterclaim for revocation) concerning EP 2 129 956, the Düsseldorf Local Division recorded the mutual withdrawals of Per Aarsleff A/S and of IMS Robotics GmbH and IMS…
Read the analysisDolby International v ASUS Computer (CFI, ORD_68548/2024, 10 February 2025)
By an order of 10 February 2025 (UPC_CFI_456/2023, EP 3 490 258 B1), the Düsseldorf Local Division allowed, following an out-of-court settlement, the withdrawal of Dolby International's infringement action against four ASUS group companies and of the revocation counterclaim, each side consenting.
Read the analysisDolby International v ASUS Computer (CFI, ORD_68550/2024, 10 February 2025)
By an order of 10 February 2025 (UPC_CFI_456/2023), the Düsseldorf Local Division, following a settlement, allowed Dolby International AB to withdraw its action for infringement of EP 3 490 258 B1, including its application to amend, and the ASUS companies to withdraw…
Read the analysisPanasonic Holdings v Xiaomi Technology Germany (CFI, 4 February 2025)
By an order of 4 February 2025 (UPC_CFI_218/2023, EP 3 069 315), the Mannheim Local Division allowed, following a settlement, the withdrawal of Panasonic's infringement action against Xiaomi companies and two distributors and of their revocation counterclaim.
Read the analysisPanasonic Holdings v Xiaomi Technology Germany (CFI, 3 February 2025)
By an order of 3 February 2025 (UPC_CFI_219/2023), the Mannheim Local Division allowed, following a settlement, the withdrawal of Panasonic's infringement action against Xiaomi and two distributors, and of the revocation counterclaim.
Read the analysisPanasonic Holdings v Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications (CFI, 3 February 2025)
By an order of 3 February 2025 (UPC_CFI_210/2023), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division, on the parties' joint application, permitted the withdrawal of Panasonic's infringement action (EP 2 568 724) against OPPO and OROPE Germany and of the counterclaims for revocation,…
Read the analysisAbbott Diabetes Care v Dexcom (CFI, ORD_68866/2024, 29 January 2025)
By an order of 29 January 2025 (UPC_CFI_424/2023, ORD_68588/2024, EP 4 070 727), The Hague Local Division allowed, with the consent of all parties, the withdrawal of Abbott Diabetes Care's infringement action against Dexcom Inc.
Read the analysisDexcom International (CFI, 29 January 2025)
Read the French analysisQualcomm v Shenzhen Transsion Holdings (CFI, 28 January 2025)
By a decision of 28 January 2025 (UPC_CFI_421/2024, EP 2 286 325), the Munich Local Division allowed the withdrawal of Qualcomm's infringement action against Shenzhen Transsion Holdings and five other defendants, following a settlement with the former, and declared the proceedings closed.
Read the analysisDexCom v Abbott Laboratories (CoA, ORD_3985/2025, 24 January 2025)
In an order of 24 January 2025 (UPC_CoA_840/2024), the Court of Appeal permitted, on appeal, the withdrawal of DexCom’s infringement action and of the counterclaim for revocation brought by the Abbott companies, including Newyu, concerning EP 3 831 282.
Read the analysisDainese v Alpinestars (CFI, 24 January 2025)
By an order of 24 January 2025 (ORD_68843/2024, UPC_CFI_472/2024), the full panel of the Milan Local Division classified as confidential the settlement between Dainese and the defendant Horizon Moto 95, filed in support of a partial withdrawal (Exhibit 70), together with the…
Read the analysisAbbott Diabetes Care v Dexcom (CFI, 20 January 2025)
In a decision of 20 January 2025, the full panel of the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division (judge-rapporteur Kai Härmand) declared closed the proceedings between Abbott Diabetes Care and Dexcom Inc.
Read the analysisAbbott Diabetes Care (CFI, 20 January 2025)
Read the French analysisDexcom (CFI, 20 January 2025)
Read the French analysisNEC v TCL Deutschland (CFI, ORD_2317/2025, 17 January 2025)
In a decision of 15 January 2025, panel 2 of the Munich Local Division (judge-rapporteur Ulrike Voß) permitted the withdrawal of the infringement action brought by NEC Corporation against TCL Deutschland and six other companies (UPC_CFI_487/2023, EP 2 645 714), with Access…
Read the analysisNEC v TCL Deutschland (CFI, ORD_2333/2025, 17 January 2025)
By order of 15 January 2025 (UPC_CFI_498/2023), the Munich Local Division permitted NEC to withdraw its infringement action against several TCL group companies based on EP 3 057 321, the parties having reached an agreement before the close of the written procedure.
Read the analysisAvago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 16 January 2025)
By order of 16 January 2025, the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division, Dr Schilling, permitted Tesla Germany and Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg to withdraw their application for the determination of costs (UPC_CFI_54/2023) and declared those proceedings closed, after the parties had withdrawn,…
Read the analysisAvago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CoA, 15 January 2025)
In a decision of 15 January 2025, issued in German in the joined appeals UPC_CoA_629/2024, 631/2024 and 632/2024, the Court of Appeal permitted the withdrawal of Avago’s infringement action and of Tesla’s counterclaims for revocation concerning EP 1 612 910, following the…
Read the analysis