Appellant*** v ORTHOAPNEA (CoA, 3 July 2025)
| Date | 3 July 2025 |
|---|---|
| Court | CoA |
| Division | Luxembourg (LU) |
| Type of action | Withdrawal (RoP265) |
| Registry reference | App_23563/2025 · ORD_23914/2025 |
| Parties | Appellant*** v. ORTHOAPNEA S.L., VIVISOL B BV |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By decision of 3 July 2025, given in Dutch, the Court of Appeal (Grabinski, Blok, Gougé) allowed the withdrawal of the appeal against the Brussels Local Division’s decision of 17 January 2025, which had dismissed the infringement actions on EP 2 331 036 against OrthoApnea S.L. and Vivisol B (UPC_CoA_232/2025). The interest lies in costs: an appellant who withdraws bears the costs of the appeal even where it withdraws early, and their amount is then fixed before the first instance division.
Question
Must an appellant that withdraws promptly, with no objection from the respondent, bear the costs of the appeal, and may the Court of Appeal fix their amount or order the resumption of the cost proceedings stayed at first instance?
Decision
The Court allowed the withdrawal by analogy with Rule 265.1 and declared the appeal proceedings closed (paragraphs 8 and 9). The appellant, treated as the unsuccessful party, must bear OrthoApnea’s reasonable and proportionate costs under Art. 69(1) UPCA, the early withdrawal bears on the amount, not on the principle (paragraphs 10 and 11). The request to fix costs at EUR 2,693.33 was inadmissible: OrthoApnea must apply to the Brussels Local Division within one month of service (Rules 265.2(c) and 151, paragraph 12). The request to resume the first instance cost proceedings was also inadmissible (paragraph 13).
Key points for practice
- Practical point: withdrawing an appeal does not avoid costs, the respondent must then bring cost proceedings before the first instance division within one month, as that division alone fixes the amount.
Provisions applied
- Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
- Art. 69(1)
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 151, 265.1 and 265.2
- Case law cited
- Tiroler Rohre v SSAB Swedish Steel, 3 July 2025 (Court of Appeal)
Related decisions
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: UPC Court of Appeal.
Dhenne Avocats blog: UPC Appeals: What the Numbers Show.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
Parties
- defendantORTHOAPNEA S.L10 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantVIVISOL B BV7 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantAppellant***Follow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Withdrawal (RoP265)
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La cour d'appel autorise le désistement, déclare la procédure d'appel close et met les frais d'appel à la charge de l'appelant, leur montant devant être fixé par la division locale de Bruxelles.
- Appeal
- Decision of the Court of Appeal.
- Instance
- Court of Appeal decision.
Patents mentioned
EP 2 331 036mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Tiroler Rohre v SSAB Swedish Steel (CoA, 3 July 2025) cited in this record
- OrthoApnea v *** (CFI, 2 May 2025) cited in this record
- *** v OrthoApnea (CFI, 17 January 2025) cited in this record
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 2 331 036Device for treating night time breathing problems recorded proprietor: Personne physique (déposant individuel) | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 8 other decision(s): OrthoApnea v *** (CFI, 25 July 2025) · OrthoApnea v *** (CFI, 2 May 2025) · OrthoApnea v *** (CoA, 21 November 2024) · *** v OrthoApnea (CFI, 17 September 2024) · OrthoApnea v *** (CoA, 26 July 2024) · OrthoApnea (CFI, 19 July 2024) · OrthoApnea (CFI, 8 July 2024) · *** v OrthoApnea (CFI, 21 September 2023) | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet · European Patent Register existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically) mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.