Opens in a new tab

Atlas Global v Vantiva (CFI, UPC_CFI_407/2025, 22 December 2025)

Date22 December 2025
CourtCFI
DivisionDüsseldorf (DE) Local Division
Type of actionWithdrawal (RoP265)
Case number(s)UPC_CFI_407/2025;UPC_CFI_686/2024;UPC_CFI_407/2024
Registry referenceUPC_CFI_407/2025and · UPC_CFI_686/2024 · UPC_CFI_407/2024and
PartiesAtlas Global Technologies GmbH v. Vantiva SA a. o.

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source
Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language
not recorded
Translation available
no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked
not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

  • UPC_CFI_407/2025 official number
  • UPC_CFI_686/2024 official number
  • UPC_CFI_407/2024 official number

Follow these proceedings

Parties

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

  1. 30 May 2025 Genentech v Organon (CFI, UPC_CFI_407/2025, 30 May 2025) Application for preserving evidence pursuant to RoP192 · UPC_CFI_407/2025

    La division locale de Bruxelles ordonne la conservation des preuves et l'inspection sur les sites belge et néerlandais d'Organon au titre d'EP 3 401 335, sans audition préalable, et rejette les demandes contre Organon & Co. et Henlius, établies hors du territoire de la JUB.

  2. 1 August 2025 Genentech v Organon (CFI, 1 August 2025) Generic Order · UPC_CFI_407/2025
  3. 14 October 2025 Genentech v Organon (CFI, 14 October 2025) Generic Order · UPC_CFI_407/2025
  4. 17 October 2025 Genentech v Organon (CFI, 17 October 2025) Generic Order · UPC_CFI_407/2025
  5. 12 November 2025 Genentech v Organon Heist (CFI, UPC_CFI_407/2025, 12 November 2025) Application for preserving evidence pursuant to RoP192 · UPC_CFI_407/2025

    Les ordonnances de conservation des preuves et d'inspection rendues sans audition d'Organon sont maintenues : le choix de la voie non contradictoire était justifié, la contrefaçon imminente plausible et l'étendue des mesures proportionnée, les griefs relatifs à l'exécution sont irrecevables.

  6. 22 December 2025 Atlas Global v Vantiva (CFI, UPC_CFI_407/2025, 22 December 2025) Withdrawal (RoP265) · UPC_CFI_407/2025, UPC_CFI_686/2024, UPC_CFI_407/2024
  7. 12 February 2026 Genentech v Organon Heist (CFI, 12 February 2026) Generic Order · UPC_CFI_407/2025

    Les procédures ayant été closes à la suite d'un désistement, la garantie de 25 000 euros consignée par Genentech et Roche pour l'exécution de l'ordonnance du 30 mai 2025 leur est restituée.

What the record states

Nature of the act
Withdrawal (RoP265)
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
La division locale de Düsseldorf autorise le désistement de l'action d'Atlas Global contre Vantiva et de la demande reconventionnelle, déclare l'instance éteinte et rembourse 60 % des frais de justice à chaque côté.
Appeal
No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance
First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Patents mentioned

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Patents and standards

PublicationRole in the disputeFamilyStandard and declarationPoolSources
EP 3 353 901Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified)
Also mentioned in 4 other decision(s): Atlas Global v Vantiva (CFI, UPC_CFI_314/2024, 22 December 2025) · Atlas Global v TP-LINK (CFI, 18 September 2025) · Atlas Global Technologies v Vantiva (CFI, 17 April 2025) · Atlas Global Technologies v TP-LINK (CFI, 17 April 2025)
not recordednot recordednot recordedEspacenet
links not checked
mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis
The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.

Follow

Weekly summary, on Fridays.