Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Procedural orders" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
639 decisions recorded
By an order of 26 March 2024 (UPC_CFI_397/2023, ORD_12088/2024), judge-rapporteur Lignières of the Paris Local Division set up a confidentiality club for the confidential information in the expert's report of 5 February 2024, drawn up following the saisie ordered on 14 November…
Read the analysisBy an order of 22 March 2024 (UPC_CFI_463/2023, ACT_590953/2023, App_14943/2024), the presiding judge of the Düsseldorf Local Division, acting as judge-rapporteur, allowed Curio Bioscience Inc.'s patent attorney to plead in English, with simultaneous interpretation into German, at the hearing of 26 and…
Read the analysisBy a procedural order of 15 May 2024 (UPC_CFI_62/2023, ACT_463961/2023, CC_584134/2023), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (Pichlmaier) scheduled an interim conference for 11 September 2024 and moved the oral hearing from 11 July to 23 October 2024.
Read the analysisBy an order of 13 March 2024 (UPC_CFI_440/2023, ACT_588685/2023, order no. 13006, App_12803/2024), the Paris Local Division (C.
Read the analysisBy an order of 5 March 2024 (UPC_CFI_15/2023, ACT_459987/2023, CC_584916/2023, CC_585030/2023, App_7662/2024), the presiding judge and judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (M.
Read the analysisBy an order of 1 March 2024 (UPC_CFI_397/2023, order no. 9825), the full panel of the Paris Local Division (C. Lignières, presiding and judge-rapporteur, C.
Read the analysisBy an order of 27 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_255/2023, ACT_551308/2023, App_7184/2024), panel 2 of the Paris Central Division (P. Catallozzi, T. Zhilova and S.
Read the analysisBy an order of 28 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_495/2023, ACT_596432/2023, order no. 10136, App_8330/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division (C.
Read the analysisBy an order of 27 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_255/2023, ACT_551308/2023, App_7364/2024), the presiding judge and judge-rapporteur of panel 2 of the Paris Central Division (P.
Read the analysisBy an order of 27 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_440/2023, ACT_588685/2023, ORD_10099/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division (C. Lignieres), after consulting the panel, declined to propose to the parties a change from French to English, the language in which EP 3 404…
Read the analysisBy an order of 22 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_223/2023), the Mannheim Local Division, in Panasonic Holdings Corporation's infringement action on EP 2 207 270 against Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH and five other companies, decided to hear both the infringement action and the counterclaim…
Read the analysisBy an order of 22 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_216/2023), the Mannheim Local Division, in Panasonic Holdings Corporation's infringement action on EP 3 096 315 against OROPE Germany GmbH and Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp.
Read the analysisBy order of 22 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_210/2023), the Mannheim Local Division (P. Tochtermann, presiding judge and judge-rapporteur, H.
Read the analysisBy order of 22 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_218/2023), the Mannheim Local Division (P. Tochtermann, presiding judge and judge-rapporteur, H.
Read the analysisBy an order of 22 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_222/2023), the Mannheim Local Division, in Panasonic Holdings Corporation's infringement action on EP 2 207 270 against OROPE Germany GmbH and Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp.
Read the analysisBy order of 22 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_219/2023), the Mannheim Local Division (P. Tochtermann, presiding judge and judge-rapporteur, H.
Read the analysisBy order of 20 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_455/2023), Paolo Catallozzi, judge-rapporteur of the Paris Central Division, hearing the action for a declaration of non-infringement of EP 2 196 231 brought on 30 November 2023 by Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
Read the analysisBy an order of 20 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_454/2023), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Central Division, in the revocation action against EP 2 196 231 brought by Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
Read the analysisBy an order of 15 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_239/2023, ORD_8243/2024), The Hague Local Division, in the infringement action on EP 2 137 782 brought by Plant-e Knowledge B.V.
Read the analysisBy an order of 13 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_239/2023, App_586761/2023), The Hague Local Division dismissed the application by Arkyne Technologies S.L., defendant in the infringement action on EP 2 137 782, for Plant-e Knowledge B.V.
Read the analysisBy an order of 12 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_425/2023, ORD_7664/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division, in Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.'s infringement action on EP 3 988 471 against Dexcom Inc., Dexcom International Limited and Dexcom France SAS, aligned the start of…
Read the analysisBy an order of 12 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_395/2023, ORD_7657/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division, in DexCom, Inc.'s infringement action on EP 3 831 282 against Abbott Laboratories and thirteen other defendants, aligned the start of the time limit for the…
Read the analysisBy an order of 12 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_495/2023, Order no. 7671, Application no. 5858/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division, in ICPillar LLC's infringement action on EP 3 000 239 against several Arm group companies and other defendants, authorised service by…
Read the analysisBy an order of 12 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_440/2023), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division, in the infringement action on EP 3 404 726 brought by Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd against Laser Components SAS concerning UV LED chips, declared admissible the application…
Read the analysisBy an order of 9 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_412/2023), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Central Division rejected the request by ITCiCo Spain S.L., defendant in the revocation action against EP 2 796 333 brought by Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft, to extend the time…
Read the analysisBy an order of 20 January 2024 (UPC_CFI_363/2023, ACT_579244/2023, App_2249/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division rejected the request of expert e-Commerce GmbH and expert klein GmbH, sued by Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd for infringement of EP 3 926 698, to…
Read the analysisBy an order of 19 January 2024 (UPC_CFI_457/2023, ACT_590145/2023, App_1714/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division, in the action brought by Dolby International AB against fifteen HP group companies for infringement of EP 3 490 258, set a common end date…
Read the analysisBy an order of 17 January 2024 (UPC_CFI_239/2023, ACT_549536/2023, CC_588768/2023, ORD_2223/2024), issued of its own motion by the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division (M.
Read the analysisBy an order of 16 January 2024 (UPC_CFI_373/2023, ACT_590837/2023), the President of the Court of First Instance (F. Butin), after consulting the panel of the Düsseldorf Local Division, granted the application of Aarke AB, defendant in SodaStream Industries Ltd.'s action for infringement…
Read the analysisBy order of 18 October 2023 (UPC_CFI_177/2023, APP_552740/2023), the Düsseldorf Local Division ordered Revolt Zycling to pay a penalty of EUR 26,500 for breaching the injunction granted against it at myStromer's request by the provisional measures order of 22 June 2023 (ORD_526778/2023)…
Read the analysisBy order of 22 September 2023 (UPC_CFI_201/2023, APP_559862/2023), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division, in N.V. Nutricia's infringement action on EP 2 359 858 against Nestlé Health Science (Deutschland), postponed until the Statement of defence has been lodged the referral to…
Read the analysisBy order of 28 August 2023, the judge-rapporteur of the Helsinki Local Division, in AIM Sport Vision v Supponor (EP 3 295 663), organised the next steps in the main action and the provisional measures proceedings after the defendants filed a preliminary…
Read the analysis