Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Application Rop 223" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
34 decisions recorded
In an order of 2 November 2026 (UPC_CoA_176/2026 and UPC_CoA_177/2026), the Court of Appeal dismisses Netflix’s application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the decision of the Munich Local Division of 15 September 2026, which found it liable for indirect infringement…
Read the analysisIn an order of 2 November 2026 (UPC_CoA_176/2026 and UPC_CoA_177/2026), the Court of Appeal dismisses Netflix’s application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the decision of the Munich Local Division of 15 September 2026, which found it liable for indirect infringement…
Read the analysisIn an order of 24 April 2026 (UPC_CoA_57/2026), the Court of Appeal refuses suspensive effect for Polytechnik's appeal against the Copenhagen Local Division's order of 10 April 2026 requiring it, under penalty, to produce drawings and manuals of its furnaces to Dall…
Read the analysisBy an order of 14 April 2026 (UPC_CoA_48/2026), the Court of Appeal rejects La Siddhi Consultancy's application for suspensive effect against the Milan Central Division's order of 13 March 2026, which required it to provide EUR 75,000 security for costs in its…
Read the analysisIn an order of 24 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_935/2025), the Court of Appeal declares inadmissible the second application for suspensive effect filed by the appellant, the defendant found liable by default by The Hague Local Division on 21 October 2025 for infringing Amycel's…
Read the analysisIn an order of 24 March 2026 (UPC_CoA_44/2026), the Court of Appeal rejects ALPINA Coffee Systems' application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the Düsseldorf Local Division's decision of 18 March 2026, which had largely upheld CUP&CINO's infringement action (EP 3…
Read the analysisIn an order of 18 February 2026 (UPC_CoA_19/2026), the Court of Appeal refused suspensive effect to Guardant Health's appeal against the EUR 400,000 interim award of costs made against it by the Paris Local Division on 23 January 2026, after its application…
Read the analysisBy an order of 16 January 2026 (UPC_CoA_935/2025), the Court of Appeal refused suspensive effect for the appeal against The Hague Local Division's default decision of 21 October 2025, which found that the "Cayene" mushroom strain infringed Amycel's EP 1 993 350.
Read the analysisBy order of 29 December 2025 (UPC_CoA_936/2025), the President of the Court of Appeal, sitting as standing judge in a case of extreme urgency under Rule 223.4 RoP, dismissed five Amazon companies' request for suspensive effect against the Mannheim Local Division's order…
Read the analysisIn an order of 2 December 2025 (UPC_CoA_894/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal refused Windhager Handelsgesellschaft's application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the Mannheim Local Division decision of 12 September 2025, which had largely upheld bellissa HAAS's infringement…
Read the analysisBy order of 24 November 2025, the standing judge of the Court of Appeal rejects Suinno’s application for suspensive effect, made together with its application for leave to appeal the Paris Central Division’s decision of 6 November 2025 fixing the costs payable…
Read the analysisBy an order of 7 November 2025 (UPC_CoA_900/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal rejected the application for suspensive effect filed by Lepu Medical (Europe) and Lepu Medical Technology (Beijing) against the Hamburg Local Division's order of 21 October 2025 granting…
Read the analysisBy an order of 6 November 2025 (UPC_CoA_897/2025), the Court of Appeal rejected Black Sheep Retail Products' application for suspensive effect against the information order made by the Hague Local Division in its decision of 10 October 2025, which had held HL…
Read the analysisBy an order of 25 August 2025 (UPC_CoA_759/2025), the Court of Appeal rejected Sun Patent Trust's application for suspensive effect against the Paris Local Division's order of 31 July 2025 which, in its infringement action against Vivo (EP 3 852 468), gave…
Read the analysisBy an order of 25 August 2025 (UPC_CoA_758/2025, App_34971/2025), the Court of Appeal rejected Sun Patent Trust's application for suspensive effect against the Paris Local Division's order of 31 July 2025 which, in its infringement action against the Vivo companies on EP…
Read the analysisBy order of 15 August 2025 (UPC_CoA_737/2025), Judge Rombach, standing judge of the Court of Appeal, rejected RiVOLUTiON's application for suspensive effect against the provisional measures ordered by the Munich Local Division on 6 August 2025 in favour of Cilag GmbH International…
Read the analysisBy order of 10 July 2025 (UPC_CoA_581/2025, App_30685/2025), the judge rapporteur Gougé (Court of Appeal) rejected OTEC Präzisionsfinish's application for suspensive effect against the Hamburg Local Division's order of 16 June 2025, which had provisionally restrained it, in 18 states, from infringing…
Read the analysisBy order of 26 June 2025, the Court of Appeal (Kalden, Rombach, Simonsson) granted suspensive effect to the appeal of Easee's managing director against the Hamburg Local Division's order of 30 May 2025 requiring EUR 75,000 security for costs in respect of…
Read the analysisThe Court of Appeal refused suspensive effect for NUC Electronics' appeal against the Mannheim Local Division's decision of 11 March 2025, which found infringement of EP 2 028 981 and ordered NUC to give Hurom information on origin, distribution channels, quantities, prices…
Read the analysisBy order of 21 May 2025 (UPC_CoA_365/2025), the Court of Appeal rejected all of Knaus Tabbert's requests for suspensive effect of its appeal against the Düsseldorf Local Division's decision of 10 April 2025, which had found infringement of EP 3 356 109…
Read the analysisBy order of 18 April 2025 (UPC_CoA_166/2025), the Court of Appeal rejects the application by Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences for suspensive effect of their appeal against the Munich Local Division’s decision of 15 November 2024, as rectified on 17 February…
Read the analysisBy order of 17 April 2025 (UPC_CoA_312/2025 and UPC_CoA_325/2025), the Court of Appeal rejects the application by Kodak Holding, Kodak GmbH and Kodak Graphic Communications for suspensive effect of their appeal against the Mannheim Local Division’s decision of 2 April 2025.
Read the analysisBy order of 17 April 2025 (UPC_CoA_329/2025), the Court of Appeal, sitting as a single judge, rejects Barco’s application for suspensive effect of its appeal (UPC_CoA_317/2025), limited to the costs order, against the Brussels Local Division’s order of 21 March 2025.
Read the analysisBy order of 16 January 2025 (UPC_CoA_12/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal, Emmanuel Gougé, rejected the application for suspensive effect filed by Bhagat Textile Engineers with its appeal against the Milan Local Division's decision of 4 November 2024, which had…
Read the analysisIn an order of 17 December 2024 (UPC_CoA_810/2024), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal rejected Curio Bioscience’s application for suspensive effect against the Düsseldorf Local Division’s order of 3 December 2024, which required it to provide security of €200,000 for…
Read the analysisIn an order of 29 October 2024 (UPC_CoA_549/2024), the Court of Appeal granted partial suspensive effect to Belkin’s appeal against the Munich Local Division’s decision on the merits of 13 September 2024 finding infringement of Philips’ EP 2 867 997.
Read the analysisBy order of 18 January 2024 (UPC_CoA_4/2024, App_100/2024), the Court of Appeal rejected Meril's application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the costs decision of the Munich Local Division of 19 December 2023, given after provisional measures proceedings brought by Edwards…
Read the analysisBy order of 6 November 2023 (UPC_CoA_407/2023, App_584588/2023), the standing judge of the Court of Appeal, acting in extreme urgency, granted suspensive effect to Ocado Innovation's appeal against the order of the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division (ORD_573437/2023) that gave a third party access,…
Read the analysis