Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Nordic Baltic Regional Division" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
27 decisions recorded
In an order of 5 December 2025, the judge-rapporteur of the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division stayed, at the parties' joint request, cost proceedings UPC_CFI_775/2025, 776/2025 and 777/2025 between Edwards Lifesciences and the Meril group (EP 3 769 722) pending the decision of the…
Read the analysisBy an order of 2 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_380/2023), the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division dismissed the requests for rectification filed by Meril Life Sciences and five other defendants against the decision on the merits of 21 July 2025 in favour of Edwards Lifesciences (EP…
Read the analysisBy a decision of 31 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_9/2024), the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division (Judges Johansson, presiding and judge-rapporteur, Härmand, Zana and Vandeberg, technically qualified judge) largely upheld the infringement action brought by TEXPORT, as exclusive licensee, against Sioen NV under claims 1 and…
Read the analysisBy decision of 18 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_8/2023, ORD_32871/2025), the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division confirmed the settlement reached on 10 July 2025 between Edwards Lifesciences and Meril Lifesciences, Meril GmbH, SMIS International and Sormedica, ending the infringement action under EP 2 628 464 and…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 21 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_380/2023), the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division upheld Edwards Lifesciences’ infringement action on EP 3 769 722 (a delivery system for a transcatheter heart valve) against Meril Life Sciences, Meril Germany and four distributors concerning the Navigator…
Read the analysisBy order of 25 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_452/2024, ORD_18928/2025), the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division (Judges Johansson, presiding, Härmand, judge-rapporteur, Rinkinen and van der Burg) declared closed, on a joint request, the proceedings comprising Viking Arm's infringement action on EP 3 953 541 against three…
Read the analysisBy decision of 27 February 2025 (UPC_CFI_743/2024, ACT_63292/2024, ORD_9485/2025), the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division (Judges Johansson, presiding and judge-rapporteur, Härmand and Knijff) closed the provisional measures proceedings brought by Fapa Vital AG against Valentis Baltic, UAB on EP 1 978 949, following a…
Read the analysisBy an order of 17 February 2025 (ORD_68981/2024, UPC_CFI_527/2024), Judge Stefan Johansson, sitting alone in the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division, closed the evidence preservation proceedings brought by Imbox Protection A/S against Brunngård Group AB and Footbridge Group AB in respect of EP 2…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 20 January 2025, the full panel of the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division (judge-rapporteur Kai Härmand) declared closed the proceedings between Abbott Diabetes Care and Dexcom Inc.
Read the analysisBy a procedural order of 11 December 2024 (UPC_CFI_380/2023, ACT_582093/2023), the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division, reconsidering the matter after remittal by the Court of Appeal, dismissed the request by Meril Life Sciences Pvt Limited and five other defendants to stay Edwards Lifesciences Corporation's…
Read the analysisIn an order of 10 December 2024 following the interim conference (UPC_CFI_380/2023), the judge-rapporteur of the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division managed the infringement action on unitary patent EP 3 769 722 brought by Edwards Lifesciences against Meril Life Sciences and five other companies,…
Read the analysisBy order of 29 October 2024 following the interim conference (UPC_CFI_9/2024, ACT_953/2024, ORD_59030/2024), the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division (S. Johansson, presiding and rapporteur, K.
Read the analysisBy preliminary order of 7 October 2024 (UPC_CFI_430/2023, ACT_588346/2023, ORD_55063/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division (K. Härmand, panel presided by S.
Read the analysisBy a procedural order delivered on 18 September 2024 (UPC_CFI_8/2023, ACT_459769/2023, ORD_36465/2024), the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division (S. Johansson, presiding, K.
Read the analysisBy order of 20 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_380/2023, ACT_582093/2023, ORD_14940/2024), the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division (Johansson, Härmand, Bessaud, Wilhelm) dismissed the request of Meril Life Sciences and five other defendants for Edwards Lifesciences, based in the United States, to provide security of EUR 800,000…
Read the analysisBy order of 20 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_380/2023, ACT_582093/2023, ORD_16663/2024), the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division (Johansson, Härmand, Bessaud, Wilhelm) dismissed the request of Meril Life Sciences and five other defendants to stay the infringement action on EP 3 769 722 brought by Edwards Lifesciences…
Read the analysisBy order of 16 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_8/2023, ACT_459769/2023, ORD_44404/2024), the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division set the timetable for resuming Edwards Lifesciences' infringement action on EP 2 628 464 against Meril Lifesciences and other defendants, together with the counterclaims for revocation.
Read the analysisBy order of 17 October 2023 (UPC_CFI_11/2023, application 543819/2023), the judge-rapporteur of the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division granted a third party, whose name is redacted, access to the statement of claim in the infringement action brought by Ocado Innovation against Autostore AS and…
Read the analysisBy decision of 8 September 2023 (UPC_CFI_11/2023, ACT_459791/2023), the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division permitted Ocado Innovation to withdraw its infringement action against Autostore AS and seven other Autostore group companies (EP 3 653 540), following a settlement and before all defendants had been…
Read the analysis