OCADO INNOVATION v AUTOSTORE (CFI, 8 September 2023)
| Date | 8 September 2023 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Nordic Baltic Regional Division |
| Type of action | Infringement Action |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CFI_11/2023 |
| Registry reference | ORD_459791/2023 · UPC_CFI_11/2023 |
| Parties | OCADO INNOVATION LIMITED v. AUTOSTORE AS |
Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Case timeline
- 17 October 2023 : OCADO INNOVATION v AUTOSTORE (CFI, 17 October 2023) ORD_543819/2023 · UPC_CFI_11/2023
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- claimantOCADO INNOVATION LIMITED9 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantAUTOSTORE AS4 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
- 8 September 2023 OCADO INNOVATION v AUTOSTORE (CFI, 8 September 2023) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_11/2023
- 17 October 2023 OCADO INNOVATION v AUTOSTORE (CFI, 17 October 2023) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_11/2023
Le juge rapporteur accorde à un tiers l'accès au mémoire en demande, après occultation des données personnelles et à compter du 7 novembre 2023, refuse l'accès aux ordonnances et autorise l'appel.
- 10 April 2024 Ocado Innovation v Autostore (CoA, 10 April 2024) Generic Order · appeal, first-instance number cited in the decision
La cour d'appel de la JUB juge qu'elle peut statuer sans juges techniciens sur une question non technique et confirme l'accès d'un membre du public au mémoire en demande d'une action close par transaction, après mise en balance des intérêts de l'article 45 de l'Accord.
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Infringement Action
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La division déclare la procédure close après le désistement consenti par les défenderesses, ne statue pas sur les frais, fixe la valeur du litige à 3 000 000 EUR et rembourse 18 600 EUR de taxes.
- Appeal
- An appeal is documented in the corpus (see above).
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 3 653 540mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- OCADO INNOVATION v AUTOSTORE (CFI, 17 October 2023) cited in this record
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 3 653 540 | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 1 other decision(s): OCADO INNOVATION v AUTOSTORE (CFI, 17 October 2023) | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.