Decision By Default

Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Decision By Default" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.

Find a decision in three steps

  1. 1. SearchEnter a party name, case number or keyword.
  2. 2. RefineUse the filters to refine your search, then select Filter.
  3. 3. ReadOpen a title. The “Decision with commentary” badge identifies a case note by the firm.
Scope, method and reading key

UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.

11 decisions recorded

Appellant v Amycel (CoA, UPC_CoA_935/2025, 2 November 2026)

2 November 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Appeal RoP220.1 Decision with commentary

In a decision of 2 November 2026 (UPC_CoA_935/2025), the Court of Appeal, presided over by Klaus Grabinski, sets aside the decision by default given on 21 October 2025 by The Hague Local Division against a defendant established in Poland, together with the…

Read the analysis

Maschio Gaspardo v Spiridonakis Bros (CFI, 25 June 2025)

25 June 2025 CFI / Milan (IT) Central Division- Section / Decision By Default Decision with commentary

By decision by default of 8 July 2025, the Milan Central Division (Postiglione, Klein, Ledeboer) held that the “Bellota” tool marketed by the Greek company Spiridonakis Bros infringes claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 10 of EP 1 998 604,…

Read the analysis

EOFLOW v Insulet (CFI, 28 May 2025)

28 May 2025 CFI / Milan (IT) Central Division- Section / Decision By Default Decision with commentary

By decision of 22 July 2025, the Milan Central Division dismissed by default EOFLOW's revocation action against EP 4 201 327 (unitary effect), EOFLOW having failed to provide the EUR 500,000 security ordered on 11 April 2025, and then, after examining the…

Read the analysis

NJOY Netherlands v VMR Products (CoA, 1 April 2025)

1 April 2025 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Decision By Default Decision with commentary

By decision by default of 1 April 2025 (UPC_CoA_80/2025), the President of the Court of Appeal rejects as inadmissible NJOY Netherlands’ appeal against the Paris Central Division’s order of 29 November 2024, which had dismissed its action for revocation of VMR Products’…

Read the analysis

Abbott Laboratories v DexCom (CoA, 14 March 2024)

14 March 2024 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Decision By Default Decision with commentary

By order of 14 March 2024 (UPC_CoA_5/2024, PR_APL_189/2024), made under Rule 229.5 RoP, the President of the Court of Appeal rejected as inadmissible Abbott's appeal against the confidentiality order made on 19 December 2023 by the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division…

Read the analysis