Illumina v Element Biosciences (CFI, 16 October 2026)
By an order of 16 October 2026 following the interim conference (Rule 105.5 RoP), the judge-rapporteur of the Lisbon Local Division, in the dispute between Illumina, Inc.
Read the analysisLisbon (PT) Local Division
Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Lisbon (PT) Local Division" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.
Find a decision in three steps
- 1. SearchEnter a party name, case number or keyword.
- 2. RefineUse the filters to refine your search, then select Filter.
- 3. ReadOpen a title. The “Decision with commentary” badge identifies a case note by the firm.
Scope, method and reading key
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Advanced search
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
Favourites are kept in this browser only.
Compare two parties or two issues
Coverage actually indexed: 2524 records out of 2524, full text available for 2349 decisions (official PDFs extracted), 0 pending, 32 requiring optical recognition, 126 without a PDF. A search within decision text covers only extracted documents and is not exhaustive. Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus, counts are neither market shares nor success rates.
24 decisions recorded
TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_2665/2026, 24 August 2026)
By order of 24 August 2026 (UPC_CFI_2665/2026 and UPC_CFI_539/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Lisbon Local Division stayed Ericsson's applications against ASUSTek for re-establishment of rights (Rule 320 RoP) and for costs (Rule 150 RoP), pending the Court of Appeal's decision on the…
Read the analysisTELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_757/2024, 24 August 2026)
In an order of 24 August 2026 issued in the infringement action (UPC_CFI_757/2024) and the counterclaim for revocation (UPC_CFI_539/2025) concerning EP 2 819 131, the judge-rapporteur of the Lisbon Local Division dismissed ASUSTek's confidentiality request in Ericsson v ASUSTek.
Read the analysisTELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, 29 July 2026)
By decision of 29 July 2026, the Lisbon Local Division confirmed, at Ericsson's sole request, the costs agreement reached with ASUSTek in the infringement action concerning EP 2 819 131, and ordered ASUSTek to pay EUR 150,000.
Read the analysisShenzhen Transsion Holdings v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CFI, 14 July 2026)
In a decision of 14 July 2026, the Lisbon Local Division allowed Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co. Ltd. to withdraw its infringement action on EP 4 123 910 (UPC_CFI_850/2026), before any statement of defence and with the Ericsson companies' consent, and declared the…
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_757/2024, 2 July 2026)
By order of 2 July 2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Lisbon Local Division acknowledges that Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has complied with Rule 118.8 RoP in respect of all the orders in the decision of 6 May 2026, with effect from 15 June…
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_539/2025, 2 July 2026)
Read the French analysisIllumina v Element Biosciences (CFI, 22 June 2026)
Read the French analysisShenzhen Transsion Holdings v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CFI, UPC_CFI_850/2026, 26 May 2026, doc. 2)
By order of 26 May 2026 (UPC_CFI_850/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Lisbon Local Division ordered Shenzhen Transsion, claimant in an infringement action on EP 4 123 910 against four Ericsson companies, to provide security for costs of EUR 100,000 within 21 days,…
Read the analysisShenzhen Transsion Holdings v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CFI, UPC_CFI_850/2026, 26 May 2026)
By an order of 26 May 2026, the Lisbon Local Division dismisses the application by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) and three of its group companies to strike out, under Rules 360 and 361, the injunction requests made by Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co.
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_539/2025, 6 May 2026)
Read the French analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_757/2024, 6 May 2026)
In a decision of 6 May 2026 given in the joined infringement action and counterclaim for revocation (UPC_CFI_757/2024 and UPC_CFI_539/2025), the Lisbon Local Division held that ASUSTek Computer infringed Ericsson’s EP 2 819 131 (an inductor arrangement reducing oscillator coupling), which expired…
Read the analysisBoehringer Ingelheim International v Zentiva Portugal (CFI, 10 April 2026)
By an order of 10 April 2026 (UPC_CFI_858/2025), the Lisbon Local Division finds under Rule 360 that Boehringer Ingelheim's main action against Zentiva Portugal, brought after provisional measures were granted on appeal against a generic nintedanib product, has become devoid of purpose…
Read the analysisShenzhen Transsion Holdings v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CFI, 7 April 2026)
By order of 7 April 2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Lisbon Local Division grants the request of the four Ericsson defendants to align their time limits in the infringement action brought by Shenzhen Transsion Holdings on EP 4 123 910 (UPC_CFI_850/2026).
Read the analysisIllumina v Element Biosciences (CFI, 1 April 2026)
In an order of 1 April 2026 (UPC_CFI_1920/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Lisbon Local Division refuses to dismiss at the outset, under Rule 361 RoP, Illumina's infringement action against Element Biosciences (EP 3 714 978), whose Statement of claim had omitted the…
Read the analysisGowling WLG v ZENTIVA PORTUGAL (CFI, 6 March 2026)
By an order of 6 March 2026 (UPC_CFI_282/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Lisbon Local Division largely granted Gowling WLG's request, as a member of the public under Rule 262.1(b) RoP, for access to the pleadings in the provisional measures proceedings between Boehringer…
Read the analysisBoehringer Ingelheim Internati v Zentiva Portugal (CFI, 17 November 2025)
By an order of 17 November 2025 (UPC_CFI_858/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Lisbon Local Division rejected Zentiva Portugal's preliminary objection in the infringement action brought by Boehringer Ingelheim International on the basis of EP 1 830 843 (nintedanib).
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTeK Computer (CFI, 28 July 2025)
Read the French analysisBoehringer Ingelheim International v Zentiva Portugal (CFI, 8 May 2025)
The Lisbon Local Division refused Boehringer Ingelheim International's application for provisional measures against Zentiva Portugal under EP 1 830 843 (nintedanib, treatment of fibrotic diseases) and ordered the applicant to pay EUR 92,944.15 in interim costs.
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v AsusTek Computer (CFI, 4 April 2025)
By decision of 4 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_757/2024), the Lisbon Local Division (Judges Lopes, presiding and rapporteur, Granata and Rinkinen) allowed Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson to withdraw its action for infringement and damages (EP 2 819 131) against Digital River Ireland, which an Irish…
Read the analysisAsusTek Computer v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CFI, 4 April 2025)
By decision of 4 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_697/2024, ORD_68336/2024), Judge-rapporteur Rute Lopes of the Lisbon Local Division ruled on the costs application of AsusTek Computer, Arvato Netherlands and Digital River Ireland following the dismissal, on 15 October 2024, of Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's application…
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTEK Computer (CFI, 15 October 2024)
By order of 15 October 2024 (UPC_CFI_317/2024, ACT_35572/2024), the Lisbon Local Division (R. Lopes, presiding and rapporteur, S.
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, 23 August 2024)
By order of 23 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_317/2024, ACT_35572/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Lisbon Local Division (R. Lopes) allowed Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, in its application for provisional measures on EP 2 819 131 against ASUSTek Computer, Digital River Ireland and Arvato Netherlands, to…
Read the analysisTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTeK Computer (CFI, 16 August 2024)
By order of 16 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_317/2024, ACT_35572/2024, App_41354/2024), the Lisbon Local Division (R. Lopes, presiding judge and judge-rapporteur, S.
Read the analysis