Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTeK Computer (CFI, 28 July 2025)

Date	28 July 2025
Court	CFI
Division	Lisbon (PT) Local Division
Type of action	Infringement Action
Registry reference	ACT_63643/2024 · ORD_69389/2024
Parties	TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON v. Digital River Ireland Ltd., ASUSTek Computer Inc.

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

No case number recorded in this record.

Parties

claimantTELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSONnormalised name: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson34 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantASUSTek Computer Inc.26 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantDigital River Ireland Ltd.16 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

No other decision in the corpus bears the same case number, and no appeal is documented in the corpus to date.

What the record states

Nature of the act: Infringement Action
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary): La division locale fixe la conférence intermédiaire au 22 janvier 2026 et l’audience au 25 mars 2026, demande l’affectation d’un juge technicien et examinera conjointement l’action et la demande reconventionnelle.
Appeal: No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Patents mentioned

EP 2 819 131 mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Patents and standards

Publication	Role in the dispute	Family	Standard and declaration	Pool	Sources
`EP 2 819 131` Inductor layout for reduced VCO coupling recorded proprietor: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB	Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 9 other decision(s): Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_757/2 · TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_757/2 · TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, 29 July 2026) · Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, UPC_CFI_757/2 · Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v AsusTek Computer (CFI, 4 April 2025) · AsusTek Computer v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (CFI, 4 April 2025) · Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTEK Computer (CFI, 15 October 20 · Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer (CFI, 23 August 202	not recorded	not recorded	not recorded	Espacenet · European Patent Register existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically) mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis

The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.