Language of proceedings

Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Language of proceedings" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.

Find a decision in three steps

  1. 1. SearchEnter a party name, case number or keyword.
  2. 2. RefineUse the filters to refine your search, then select Filter.
  3. 3. ReadOpen a title. The “Decision with commentary” badge identifies a case note by the firm.
Scope, method and reading key

UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.

8 decisions recorded

Netflix Services Germany v DivX (CoA, UPC_CoA_176/2026, 2 November 2026)

2 November 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Application Rop 223 Decision with commentary

In an order of 2 November 2026 (UPC_CoA_176/2026 and UPC_CoA_177/2026), the Court of Appeal dismisses Netflix’s application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the decision of the Munich Local Division of 15 September 2026, which found it liable for indirect infringement…

Read the analysis

Netflix Services Germany v DivX (CoA, UPC_CoA_177/2026, 2 November 2026)

2 November 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Application Rop 223 Decision with commentary

In an order of 2 November 2026 (UPC_CoA_176/2026 and UPC_CoA_177/2026), the Court of Appeal dismisses Netflix’s application for suspensive effect of its appeal against the decision of the Munich Local Division of 15 September 2026, which found it liable for indirect infringement…

Read the analysis

Steindl Krantechnik v Kronos Machinery (CFI, 19 October 2026)

19 October 2026 CFI / Munich (DE) Local Division / Infringement Action Decision with commentary

By an order of 19 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_1209/2025, counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_731/2026), Matthias Zigann, presiding judge of Panel 1a of the Munich Local Division acting as judge-rapporteur, closes the interim procedure in the action brought by Steindl Krantechnik Gesellschaft m.b.H.

Read the analysis

KEEEX v ADOBE (CFI, 22 September 2026)

22 September 2026 CFI / Paris (FR) Local Division / Counterclaim for revocation Decision with commentary

By an order under Rule 105.5 RoP issued after the interim conference, the judge-rapporteur closed the interim procedure and opened the oral procedure in the infringement action brought by KEEEX against Adobe, OpenAI, Truepic, Joint Development Foundation Projects and the C2PA entities,…

Read the analysis

VALEO SYSTEMES D’ESSUYAGE v ROBERT BOSCH FRANCE (CoA, 3 April 2026)

3 April 2026 CoA / Luxembourg (LU) / Simultaneous Interpretation Decision with commentary

By order of 3 April 2026, the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal dismisses the request for simultaneous French/English interpretation made by the Bosch companies, respondents in Valeo Systèmes d’essuyage’s joined appeals (UPC_CoA_4/2026 and UPC_CoA_13/2026) against the orders of the Paris Central…

Read the analysis