Inventive step

Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Inventive step" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.

Find a decision in three steps

  1. 1. SearchEnter a party name, case number or keyword.
  2. 2. RefineUse the filters to refine your search, then select Filter.
  3. 3. ReadOpen a title. The “Decision with commentary” badge identifies a case note by the firm.
Scope, method and reading key

UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.

10 decisions recorded

Align Technology v Angelalign (CFI, 16 October 2026)

16 October 2026 CFI / Paris (FR) Local Division / Infringement Action Decision with commentary

In a decision on the merits of 16 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_684/2025 and UPC_CFI_2279/2025), the Paris Local Division upheld Align Technology’s unitary patent EP 2 237 738 B1 on orthodontic repositioning appliances and found literal infringement of claims 1, 4, 5, 7 and…

Read the analysis

BIOGARAN v H. Lundbeck (CFI, 9 October 2026)

9 October 2026 CFI / Milan (IT) Central Division- Section / Revocation Action Decision with commentary

In a decision of 9 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_1587/2025), the Milan section of the Central Division dismissed Biogaran’s revocation action against EP 4 223 296, held by H.

Read the analysis

Caelus Lifesciences IP v Pendulum Therapeutics (CFI, UPC_CFI_1615/2026, 8 October 2026)

8 October 2026 CFI / The Hague (NL) Local Division / Application for provisional measures Decision with commentary

In an order of 8 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_1615/2026), the single judge of The Hague Local Division, sitting with the parties’ consent, grants Caelus Lifesciences IP’s application for provisional measures based on EP 2 753 187 B2, which protects Eubacterium hallii and/or Alcaligenes…

Read the analysis

Maxell v Samsung Electronics (CFI, 22 September 2026)

22 September 2026 CFI / Munich (DE) Local Division / Infringement Action Decision with commentary

The Munich local division revokes the European part of Maxell’s patent for lack of novelty and dismisses the infringement action. The decision confirms that an auxiliary request drawn from the description does not escape an obviousness objection where it merely adds a…

Read the analysis

Robert Bosch v OWIM (CFI, UPC_CFI_565/2025, 31 July 2026)

31 July 2026 CFI / Mannheim (DE) Local Division / Counterclaim for revocation Decision with commentary

In a decision of 31 July 2026, published on 3 November 2026 (UPC_CFI_565/2025 and UPC_CFI_841/2025), the Mannheim Local Division largely upholds Robert Bosch’s action against OWIM, maker of the Parkside brand, and three companies of the Lidl group.

Read the analysis