Opens in a new tab

HyGear v Topsoe (CFI, 20 March 2026)

Date20 March 2026
CourtCFI
DivisionDüsseldorf (DE) Local Division
Type of actionApplication for an Order for inspection pursuant to RoP199
Case number(s)UPC_CFI_1849/2025
Registry referenceUPC_CFI_1849/2025
PartiesHyGear B.V., SYPOX GmbH - Josef Kerner Energiewirtschafts GmbH - Technical University of Munich v. Topsoe A/S

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026

Our analysis

Summary

In an order of 20 March 2026 (UPC_CFI_1849/2025), the President of the Court of First Instance, after consulting the panel of the Düsseldorf Local Division, grants HyGear’s request and replaces German with English, the language of EP 3 802 413, in the inspection and evidence preservation proceedings brought by Topsoe. The change is granted despite the objection of the Technical University of Munich, which did not explain how it would be adversely affected.

Question

Should the language of proceedings be changed to the language of the patent on grounds of fairness (Art. 49(5) UPCA and Rule 323 RoP) in multi-party inspection proceedings?

Decision

All relevant circumstances are taken into account, including the parties’ positions and in particular the defendant’s, which is decisive where the balance is even. HyGear, Topsoe and SYPOX work in English, the parties are of comparable size and resources, and most of the evidence is in English, the predominant language of hydrogen plant technology. The balance favours HyGear despite the domicile of three of the five parties, all the more so as the proceedings are expedited and the change is not likely to slow them down. The order is not conditional on any translation or interpretation arrangements and may be appealed within 15 days (Art. 73(2)(a) UPCA and Rule 220(c) RoP).

Key points for practice

Provisions applied

Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
Arts 49(1), (2) and (5) and 73(2)(a)
Rules of Procedure
Rules 192, 199, 220(c) and 323
Case law cited
Court of Appeal, 17 April 2024 (UPC_CoA_101/2024), Court of Appeal, 5 September 2024 (UPC_CoA_207/2024), Court of Appeal, 18 September 2024 (UPC_CoA_354/2024)

Related decisions

Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.


Decisions in the same proceedings

Going further

Lexicon: Order to preserve evidence (UPC).

Publications by Matthieu Dhenne: Evidence Before Argument: The French Weapon Foreign Patent Holders Forget (Kluwer Patent Blog).

Source and translations

Official source
Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language
not recorded
Translation available
no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked
not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

  • UPC_CFI_1849/2025 official number

Follow this case

Parties

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

  1. 10 December 2025 Topsoe v SYPOX (CFI, 10 December 2025) Application for an Order for inspection pursuant to RoP199 · UPC_CFI_1849/2025

    La division autorise sans audition l'inspection d'une installation de vaporeformage découverte lors d'une première inspection, y compris l'ouverture du réacteur et l'export des données de procédé, contre les trois sociétés impliquées, sans exiger de garantie.

  2. 20 March 2026 HyGear v Topsoe (CFI, 20 March 2026) Application for an Order for inspection pursuant to RoP199 · UPC_CFI_1849/2025

What the record states

Nature of the act
Application for an Order for inspection pursuant to RoP199
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
La langue de procédure devient l'anglais, langue du brevet, sans condition de traduction ou d'interprétation.
Appeal
No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance
First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Patents mentioned

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Patents and standards

PublicationRole in the disputeFamilyStandard and declarationPoolSources
EP 3 802 413
Hydrogen production by steam methane reforming
recorded proprietor: Topsoe AS
Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified)
Also mentioned in 8 other decision(s): SYPOX v Topsoe (CFI, 27 August 2026) · Topsoe v SYPOX (CFI, 26 August 2026) · SYPOX v Topsoe (CFI, 27 July 2026) · Topsoe v SYPOX (CFI, 4 May 2026) · Topsoe v SYPOX (CFI, 10 December 2025) · Topsoe v SYPOX (CFI, 26 November 2025) · Topsoe v SYPOX (CFI, 25 November 2025) · Topsoe v SYPOX (CFI, 12 October 2026)
not recordednot recordednot recordedEspacenet · European Patent Register
existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically)
mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis
The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.

Follow

Weekly summary, on Fridays.