Procedural Order
Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Procedural Order" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.
Find a decision in three steps
- 1. SearchEnter a party name, case number or keyword.
- 2. RefineUse the filters to refine your search, then select Filter.
- 3. ReadOpen a title. The “Decision with commentary” badge identifies a case note by the firm.
Scope, method and reading key
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Advanced search
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
Favourites are kept in this browser only.
Compare two parties or two issues
Coverage actually indexed: 2524 records out of 2524, full text available for 2349 decisions (official PDFs extracted), 0 pending, 32 requiring optical recognition, 126 without a PDF. A search within decision text covers only extracted documents and is not exhaustive. Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus, counts are neither market shares nor success rates.
28 decisions recorded
Labrador Diagnostics v bioMérieux (CFI, 26 September 2025)
In an order of 26 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_315/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division summoned Labrador Diagnostics and the six bioMérieux defendants under Rule 108 to the oral hearing of the infringement action on EP 3 756 767, set for 27…
Read the analysisHuawei Technologies v MediaTek (CFI, 16 September 2025)
By an order of 16 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_247/2025, App_33294/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division partly granted MediaTek Germany's request for production of documents (Rule 190) in Huawei's infringement action (EP 3 567 731).
Read the analysisOrbisk v Winnow Solutions (CFI, 13 August 2025)
Read the French analysisCentripetal v Palo Alto Networks (CFI, 25 July 2025)
By order of 25 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_636/2025), Judge Tochtermann, judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division, rejected Centripetal's request for a penalty payment against Palo Alto Networks and for an order requiring it to report any deletion or change of technical documentation, following…
Read the analysisCentripetal v Palo Alto Networks (CFI, 11 July 2025)
By order of 3 June 2025 (UPC_CFI_636/2025), made without hearing the defendant after referral back by the Court of Appeal, Judge Tochtermann (Mannheim Local Division) granted Centripetal a saisie targeting Palo Alto Networks' network security solution at its Munich branch office.
Read the analysisPfizer v Promosome (CFI, 3 April 2025)
Read the French analysisPromosome v BioNTech (CFI, 3 April 2025)
By order of 3 April 2025 (UPC_CFI_846/2024, ORD_11610/2025 and ORD_11611/2025), Judge-rapporteur Kupecz of the Munich Local Division rejected the applications to produce evidence filed on 7 March 2025 by the five BioNTech companies and the four Pfizer companies, defendants to Promosome LLC's…
Read the analysisSumi Agro v Syngenta (CoA, 19 December 2024)
In an order of 19 December 2024 (UPC_CoA_523/2024), made in Sumi Agro’s appeal against the Munich Local Division’s order for provisional measures of 27 August 2024 (EP 2 152 073), the Court of Appeal ruled on the admissibility of new evidence under…
Read the analysisAmycel v *** (CFI, 18 December 2024)
By an order of 19 December 2024 (UPC_CFI_499/2024, ACT_48877/2024), the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division held that Amycel LLC's statement of claim (EP 1993350) had been validly served on a defendant based in Poland, whose name is redacted, by alternative means…
Read the analysisHeadwater Research v Samsung Electronics (CFI, 12 November 2024)
By order of 12 November 2024 (UPC_CFI_54/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division, in Headwater Research's infringement action against Samsung Electronics based on EP 2 391 947, ordered Qualcomm, a third party, to produce within seven days an electronic copy of…
Read the analysisWinnow Solutions v Orbisk (CFI, 14 October 2024)
By order of 14 October 2024 (UPC_CFI_327/2024, ACT_36388/2024, ORD_44108/2024), the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division (E. Brinkman) partly granted the request of Winnow Solutions, proprietor of EP 3 198 245 on monitoring food waste, for Orbisk to produce evidence on its…
Read the analysisSES-imagotag v Hanshow (CFI, 11 October 2024)
By decision of 11 October 2024 (UPC_CFI_292/2023, App_3393/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (Pichlmaier) fixed at EUR 200,000 the first-instance costs that SES-imagotag must reimburse to the four Hanshow companies following the dismissal of its application for provisional measures.
Read the analysisA. Menarini Diagnostics v Insulet (CFI, 1 October 2024)
By order of 1 October 2024 (UPC_CFI_400/2024, ORD_51903/2024, App_40442/2024), the Milan Local Division (P. Perrotti, presiding, A.
Read the analysisA. Menarini Diagnostics v Insulet (CFI, 4 September 2024)
By order of 4 September 2024 (UPC_CFI_400/2024, ORD_45723/2024, App_45575/2024), the Milan Local Division (P. Perrotti, presiding, A.
Read the analysis10x Genomics v Vizgen (CFI, 15 August 2024)
By order of 15 August 2024 (UPC_CFI_22/2023), the judge-rapporteur of the Hamburg Local Division, in the infringement action brought by 10x Genomics and President and Fellows of Harvard College against Vizgen on EP 4 108 782, accepted that an application for production…
Read the analysisAvago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 6 June 2024)
By an order of 6 June 2024 (ACT_462984/2023, APP_27571/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division, Matthias Zigann, in Avago Technologies International Sales Pte.
Read the analysisAvago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 4 June 2024)
By an order of 4 June 2024 (UPC_CFI_54/2023, ACT_463258/2023, App 27608/2024, ORD_28831/2024), the Hamburg Local Division, in Avago Technologies International Sales Pte.
Read the analysisPanasonic Holdings v OROPE Germany (CFI, 16 May 2024)
By order of 16 May 2024 (UPC_CFI_216/2023, App_4931/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division rejected, at this stage, the applications for production of documents filed on 4 February 2024 by OROPE Germany and Guangdong OPPO, defendants to Panasonic's infringement action on…
Read the analysisPanasonic v OROPE Germany (CFI, 3 May 2024)
By an order of 3 April 2024 (UPC_CFI_208/2023, ACT_545535/2023, App_2352/2024 and App_14378/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (T. Pichlmaier), in an infringement action on a patent essential to the 3G and 4G standards between Panasonic and OPPO (published in anonymised…
Read the analysisHuawei v Netgear International (CFI, 24 April 2024)
By an order of 25 April 2024 (UPC_CFI_9/2023, ACT_459771/2023, App_9728/2024), the Munich Local Division (M. Zigann, T. Pichlmaier, E.
Read the analysisFUJIFILM v Kodak (CFI, 27 March 2024)
Read the French analysis10x Genomics v Curio Bioscience (CFI, 22 March 2024)
By an order of 22 March 2024 (UPC_CFI_463/2023, ACT_590953/2023, App_14943/2024), the presiding judge of the Düsseldorf Local Division, acting as judge-rapporteur, allowed Curio Bioscience Inc.'s patent attorney to plead in English, with simultaneous interpretation into German, at the hearing of 26 and…
Read the analysisPlant-e Knowledge v Arkyne Technologies (CFI, 17 January 2024)
By an order of 17 January 2024 (UPC_CFI_239/2023, ACT_549536/2023, CC_588768/2023, ORD_2223/2024), issued of its own motion by the judge-rapporteur of The Hague Local Division (M.
Read the analysismyStromer v Revolt Zycling (CFI, 22 November 2023)
Read the French analysisAIM Sport Vision v Supponor (CFI, ORD_567421/2023, 28 August 2023)
Read the French analysisAIM Sport Vision v Supponor (CFI, ORD_567559/2023, 28 August 2023)
By order of 28 August 2023, the judge-rapporteur of the Helsinki Local Division, in AIM Sport Vision v Supponor (EP 3 295 663), organised the next steps in the main action and the provisional measures proceedings after the defendants filed a preliminary…
Read the analysis