Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Generic application" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
423 decisions recorded
By order of 9 April 2024 (UPC_CoA_86/2024, App_17640/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal held that the statement of appeal and the statement of grounds of appeal filed by Panasonic against a procedural order of the Mannheim Local Division of 9…
Read the analysisBy an order of 9 April 2024 (UPC_CFI_501/2023, ACT_597277/2023, ORD_15012/2024 and ORD_16619/2024), judge-rapporteur Kokke of the Munich Local Division confirmed the change of language from German to English as of 27 March 2024 and refused the request by Meril GmbH, Meril Life…
Read the analysisBy an order of 4 April 2024 (UPC_CFI_355/2023, ACT_578607/2023), presiding judge Thomas, acting as judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division, extended until 28 May 2024 the time for FUJIFILM Corporation to reply to the statement of defence of Kodak GmbH, Kodak Graphic…
Read the analysisBy a procedural order of 15 May 2024 (UPC_CFI_62/2023, ACT_463961/2023, CC_584134/2023), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (Pichlmaier) scheduled an interim conference for 11 September 2024 and moved the oral hearing from 11 July to 23 October 2024.
Read the analysisBy an order of 13 March 2024 (UPC_CFI_440/2023, ACT_588685/2023, order no. 13006, App_12803/2024), the Paris Local Division (C.
Read the analysisBy an order of 5 March 2024 (UPC_CFI_15/2023, ACT_459987/2023, CC_584916/2023, CC_585030/2023, App_7662/2024), the presiding judge and judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (M.
Read the analysisBy an order of 27 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_255/2023, ACT_551308/2023, App_7184/2024), panel 2 of the Paris Central Division (P. Catallozzi, T. Zhilova and S.
Read the analysisBy an order of 28 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_495/2023, ACT_596432/2023, order no. 10136, App_8330/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division (C.
Read the analysisBy an order of 27 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_255/2023, ACT_551308/2023, App_7364/2024), the presiding judge and judge-rapporteur of panel 2 of the Paris Central Division (P.
Read the analysisBy order of 26 February 2024 (UPC_CoA_335/2023, APL_576355/2023), the Court of Appeal rejected the requests of both parties to stay the proceedings in NanoString's appeal against the provisional measures ordered by the Munich Local Division in favour of 10x Genomics and the…
Read the analysisBy order of 20 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_455/2023), Paolo Catallozzi, judge-rapporteur of the Paris Central Division, hearing the action for a declaration of non-infringement of EP 2 196 231 brought on 30 November 2023 by Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
Read the analysisBy an order of 20 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_454/2023), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Central Division, in the revocation action against EP 2 196 231 brought by Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
Read the analysisBy an order of 13 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_239/2023, App_586761/2023), The Hague Local Division dismissed the application by Arkyne Technologies S.L., defendant in the infringement action on EP 2 137 782, for Plant-e Knowledge B.V.
Read the analysisBy an order of 12 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_495/2023, Order no. 7671, Application no. 5858/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division, in ICPillar LLC's infringement action on EP 3 000 239 against several Arm group companies and other defendants, authorised service by…
Read the analysisBy an order of 12 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_440/2023), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Local Division, in the infringement action on EP 3 404 726 brought by Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd against Laser Components SAS concerning UV LED chips, declared admissible the application…
Read the analysisBy an order of 9 February 2024 (UPC_CFI_412/2023), the judge-rapporteur of the Paris Central Division rejected the request by ITCiCo Spain S.L., defendant in the revocation action against EP 2 796 333 brought by Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft, to extend the time…
Read the analysisBy an order of 20 January 2024 (UPC_CFI_363/2023, ACT_579244/2023, App_2249/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division rejected the request of expert e-Commerce GmbH and expert klein GmbH, sued by Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd for infringement of EP 3 926 698, to…
Read the analysisBy an order of 19 January 2024 (UPC_CFI_457/2023, ACT_590145/2023, App_1714/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division, in the action brought by Dolby International AB against fifteen HP group companies for infringement of EP 3 490 258, set a common end date…
Read the analysisBy an order of 16 January 2024 (UPC_CFI_373/2023, ACT_590837/2023), the President of the Court of First Instance (F. Butin), after consulting the panel of the Düsseldorf Local Division, granted the application of Aarke AB, defendant in SodaStream Industries Ltd.'s action for infringement…
Read the analysisBy order of 18 October 2023 (UPC_CFI_177/2023, APP_552740/2023), the Düsseldorf Local Division ordered Revolt Zycling to pay a penalty of EUR 26,500 for breaching the injunction granted against it at myStromer's request by the provisional measures order of 22 June 2023 (ORD_526778/2023)…
Read the analysis