Panasonic Holdings v Xiaomi Technology Germany (CoA, 9 April 2024)
| Date | 9 April 2024 |
|---|---|
| Court | CoA |
| Division | Luxembourg (LU) |
| Type of action | Generic application |
| Registry reference | App_17640/2024 · ORD_18690/2024 |
| Parties | Odiporo GmbH, Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V., Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH, Xiaomi Technology France S.A.S., Xiaomi Technology Italy … |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By order of 9 April 2024 (UPC_CoA_86/2024, App_17640/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Court of Appeal held that the statement of appeal and the statement of grounds of appeal filed by Panasonic against a procedural order of the Mannheim Local Division of 9 February 2024 were to be treated as served on Xiaomi on 3 April 2024. The Case Management System (CMS) had been wrongly configured, so that the notices received by Xiaomi’s representative were inconsistent. The order is of practical interest for its pragmatic approach: a CMS malfunction should not shorten a party’s time to respond.
Question
On what date is the statement of appeal and statement of grounds deemed served where the CMS was wrongly configured and the information received by the respondent’s representative was contradictory?
Decision
Chapter 2 of the Rules of Procedure on service (Rules 270 to 279) applies before the Court of Appeal, and service may be effected within the CMS under Rule 271.2 (paragraph 1). Because the CMS operated as it does for service of a statement of claim at first instance, the representative had to accept service with an access code, the date of log-in being the date of service (paragraph 2). The notification was not visible in the case file, a later message referred to 13 March 2024, and the CMS recorded service on 3 April 2024, the day of acceptance (paragraphs 3 to 5). In the interests of due process and legal certainty, the Court adopted that date, so the statement of response must be lodged by 18 April 2024 (paragraph 6).
Key points for practice
- The service rules in Chapter 2 of the Rules of Procedure apply on appeal, including service within the CMS under Rule 271.2 (paragraph 1).
- Where a CMS configuration error leaves the date of service uncertain, the Court of Appeal may itself fix that date and, with it, the time limit for the response (paragraph 6).
Provisions applied
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 270 to 279, 271.1, 271.2 and 271.6
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: UPC Court of Appeal.
Dhenne Avocats blog: UPC Appeals: What the Numbers Show.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
Parties
- claimantXiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V.32 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantXiaomi Technology Germany GmbH29 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantOdiporo GmbH5 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantXiaomi Technology France S.A.S8 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantXiaomi Technology ItalyFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Generic application
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La déclaration d'appel et le mémoire exposant les motifs de l'appel sont réputés signifiés à Xiaomi le 3 avril 2024, le mémoire en réponse devant être déposé au plus tard le 18 avril 2024.
- Appeal
- Decision of the Court of Appeal.
- Instance
- Court of Appeal decision.
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.