Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Registry procedure" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
14 decisions recorded
In a decision of 2 November 2026 (UPC_CoA_935/2025), the Court of Appeal, presided over by Klaus Grabinski, sets aside the decision by default given on 21 October 2025 by The Hague Local Division against a defendant established in Poland, together with the…
Read the analysisIn a procedural order of 30 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_2660/2026), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division ordered service of the statement of claim for infringement of EP 3 574 526 on the representative of Lexar Europe B.V., which accepted it.
Read the analysisIn an order of 22 October 2026, the President of the Court of Appeal rejects the petition for review of the Registrar’s decision of 25 June 2026 refusing to re-enter an applicant, whose name is not published, on the list of UPC…
Read the analysisBy an order of 8 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_676/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division grants the request of the four Xiaomi defendants in AX Wireless, LLC's infringement action on EP 3 072 324 for a refund of EUR 4,900 overpaid on…
Read the analysisIn an order of 16 July 2026, the President of the Court of Appeal rejected an anonymised applicant's petition for review of the Registrar's decision of 26 January 2026 refusing to confirm his registration on the list of representatives entitled under Art.
Read the analysisBy order of 16 July 2026, the President of the Court of Appeal dismissed a petition by a European patent attorney, whose identity is not published, against the Registrar's decision of 26 January 2026 refusing to enter him on the list of…
Read the analysisIn a decision of 29 June 2026 (UPC-CoA-066/2026), the President of the Court of Appeal rejects SILIMED's application for review of the Registrar's decision of 10 April 2026, which had refused to remove as unauthorised the opt-out filed by Polytech on 30…
Read the analysisBy a decision of 26 January 2026, the President of the Court of Appeal dismissed a European Patent Attorney's petition for review of the Registrar's decision of 15 September 2025 refusing to enter him on the list of UPC representatives.
Read the analysisBy order of 24 July 2025 (UPC_CoA_300/2025), the President of the Court of Appeal, Judge Grabinski, rejected the petition of a European patent attorney, whose name is redacted, against the Registrar's decision of 18 March 2025 refusing his entry on the list…
Read the analysisBy an order of 24 July 2025 (UPC_CoA_521/2025), the President of the Court of Appeal rejected a petition by a European patent attorney, whose name is redacted, against the Registrar's decision of 12 May 2025 refusing his entry on the list of…
Read the analysisBy an order of 24 July 2025 (UPC_CoA_347/2025), the President of the Court of Appeal rejected as unfounded a petition by an applicant, whose name is redacted, against the Registrar's decision of 20 March 2025 refusing his entry on the list of…
Read the analysisBy an order of 24 July 2025 (UPC_CoA_614/2025), the President of the Court of Appeal rejected a petition by a European patent attorney, whose name is redacted, against the Registrar's decision of 2 June 2025 refusing his entry on the list of…
Read the analysisBy order of 22 August 2024 (UPC_CoA_364/2024, APL_39133/2024, UPC_CoA_393/2024, APL_40020/2024), the President of the Court of Appeal (K. Grabinski) dismissed as unfounded the application for review brought by a German patent attorney, whose name is redacted, against the Registrar's decision of 4…
Read the analysis