Applicant *** (CoA, 26 January 2026)
| Date | 26 January 2026 |
|---|---|
| Court | CoA |
| Division | Luxembourg (LU) |
| Type of action | Petition for review of Registrar's decision |
| Registry reference | N/AN/AN/A |
| Parties | Applicant *** |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By a decision of 26 January 2026, the President of the Court of Appeal dismissed a European Patent Attorney’s petition for review of the Registrar’s decision of 15 September 2025 refusing to enter him on the list of UPC representatives. The request relied on a 1989 course certificate falling within the transitional regime of Rule 12.1 of the EPLC Rules. The decision holds that the one-year transitional period is not discriminatory: once it has expired, the courses listed in Rule 12.1 no longer support registration.
Question
Is the one-year period in Rule 12.1 of the EPLC Rules discriminatory, and can a late request based on a transitional course succeed?
Decision
The period ran from the entry into force of the Agreement on 1 June 2023 and expired on 3 June 2024 (paragraph 11). It is irrelevant that the UPCA has not entered into force in all signatory states (paragraph 12). As a transitional exception, Rule 12 cannot be extended beyond its wording (paragraphs 13 and 14). A late request is admissible, as there is no filing deadline, but unfounded where it relies on a Rule 12.1 course (paragraphs 15 and 16). No discrimination is established (paragraph 17). The applicant may still obtain the European Patent Litigation Certificate or a diploma under Rule 11 (paragraph 19).
Key points for practice
- Since 3 June 2024, a European Patent Attorney can no longer rely on the transitional courses in Rule 12.1 of the EPLC Rules to be registered as a representative.
- The remaining routes are the European Patent Litigation Certificate or a recognised diploma under Rule 11.
Provisions applied
- Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
- Art. 48(2)
- Rules of Procedure
- Rule 286.2
- European Patent Convention
- Art. 134
- Rules on the European Patent Litigation Certificate (EPLC Rules)
- Rules 2, 8.1, 11, 12.1, 13, 14 and 19
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: UPC Court of Appeal.
Dhenne Avocats blog: UPC Appeals: What the Numbers Show.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
Parties
- claimantApplicant ***11 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Petition for review of Registrar's decision
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- Le recours est rejeté : le délai transitoire d'un an de la règle 12.1 des règles EPLC, expiré le 3 juin 2024, n'est pas discriminatoire et une demande tardive fondée sur une formation transitoire est mal fondée.
- Appeal
- Decision of the Court of Appeal.
- Instance
- Court of Appeal decision.
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.