KraussMaffei Extrusion v TROESTER (CFI, 23 January 2024)

Date	23 January 2024
Court	CFI
Division	Munich (DE) Local Division
Type of action	Infringement Action
Case number(s)	UPC_CFI_181/2023
Registry reference	ORD_598184/2024 · UPC_CFI_181/2023
Parties	KraussMaffei Extrusion GmbH v. TROESTER GmbH & Co. KG

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

27 December 2023 : KraussMaffei Extrusion v TROESTER (CFI, 27 December 2023) ORD_588953/2023 · UPC_CFI_181/2023

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CFI_181/2023 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantKraussMaffei Extrusion GmbH4 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantTROESTER GmbH & Co. KG3 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

27 December 2023 KraussMaffei Extrusion v TROESTER (CFI, 27 December 2023) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_181/2023
La demanderesse doit garder confidentielles les informations désignées et ne pas les utiliser hors de la procédure, sous astreinte. Le surplus des demandes est rejeté et l'appel autorisé.
23 January 2024 KraussMaffei Extrusion v TROESTER (CFI, 23 January 2024) Infringement Action · UPC_CFI_181/2023

What the record states

Nature of the act: Infringement Action
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary): La procédure écrite se clôt le 8 mars 2024, l'audience du 16 avril 2024 est confirmée et la valeur du litige est fixée à 2 millions d'euros.
Appeal: No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Patents mentioned

EP 3 221 117 mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent

Related decisions cited in the analyses

KraussMaffei Extrusion v TROESTER (CFI, 27 December 2023) cited in this record

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Patents and standards

Publication	Role in the dispute	Family	Standard and declaration	Pool	Sources
`EP 3 221 117`	Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 2 other decision(s): KraussMaffei Extrusion v TROESTER (CFI, ORD_41109/2024, 11 July 2024) · KraussMaffei Extrusion v TROESTER (CFI, 27 December 2023)	not recorded	not recorded	not recorded	Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis

The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.