Rule 264 Order
Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Rule 264 Order" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.
Find a decision in three steps
- 1. SearchEnter a party name, case number or keyword.
- 2. RefineUse the filters to refine your search, then select Filter.
- 3. ReadOpen a title. The “Decision with commentary” badge identifies a case note by the firm.
Scope, method and reading key
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Advanced search
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
Compare two parties or two issues
4 decisions recorded
Panasonic Holdings v Xiaomi (CFI, ORD_25608/2024, 6 May 2024)
By an order of 6 May 2024 (UPC_CFI_223/2023, ORD_25608/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division (P. Tochtermann), in the infringement action on EP 2 207 270 brought by Panasonic Holdings Corporation against ten Xiaomi group companies, severed the proceedings against the…
Read the analysisPanasonic Holdings v Xiaomi (CFI, ORD_25617/2024, 6 May 2024)
By order of 6 May 2024 (UPC_CFI_218/2023, ORD_25617/2024), the presiding judge and judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division (P.
Read the analysisPanasonic Holdings v Xiaomi (CFI, ORD_25614/2024, 6 May 2024)
By order of 6 May 2024 (UPC_CFI_219/2023, ORD_25614/2024), the presiding judge and judge-rapporteur of the Mannheim Local Division (P.
Read the analysis