Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Application for an Order for expedition of an appeal (RoP225(e))" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
8 decisions recorded
By order of 22 May 2024 (UPC_CoA_223/2024, APL_25951/2024, App_27157/2024), the Court of Appeal (second panel) rejected Texas Instruments' request to expedite its appeal against the Munich Local Division's order of 23 April 2024 dismissing its application for security for costs in the…
Read the analysisBy order of 22 February 2024 (APL_5395/2024, App_7580), the Court of Appeal rejected Netgear's application to shorten the 15-day period available to Huawei to respond to the statement of grounds of its appeal, lodged against the order of the Munich Local Division…
Read the analysisBy order of 22 February 2024 (UPC_CoA_36/2024, APL_4881/2024, App_7573/2024), the Court of Appeal rejected Netgear's application to shorten the 15-day period available to Huawei to respond to the statement of grounds of its appeal, lodged against the order of the Munich Local…
Read the analysisBy order of 20 December 2023 (UPC_CoA_478/2023, App_594342/2023), the Court of Appeal, sitting with its three legally qualified judges only, rejected the application by OPPO and OROPE Germany to shorten Panasonic's time limit for responding to their appeal against the refusal to…
Read the analysisBy order of 20 December 2023 (UPC_CoA_476/2023, App_594339/2023), the Court of Appeal, sitting with three legally qualified judges, rejected an application by Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications and OROPE Germany to shorten the time limit for Panasonic Holdings Corporation's response to their statement…
Read the analysisBy order of 18 December 2023 (UPC_CoA_472/2023, App_594327/2023), the Court of Appeal, sitting with three legally qualified judges, rejected an application by Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications and OROPE Germany to shorten the time limit for Panasonic Holdings Corporation's response to their statement…
Read the analysis