Pharmaceutical patents and medicines regulation
Protecting a medicine, preparing a launch or responding to an infringement threat: we advise and represent clients in patent, supplementary protection certificate, generic and biosimilar disputes. The analysis connects the patent, the evidence and the market-entry timetable. Protection, launch preparation and responding to a threat each call for a tailored strategy.
Scope of work
- Validity and infringement of product, process, second medical use and formulation patents.
- Supplementary protection certificates: grant, duration, challenges, paediatric extension.
- Generic and biosimilar entry disputes, for claimants and defendants.
- Bolar exemption and acts preparatory to marketing authorisation.
- Interaction with trade secrets over dossier data and manufacturing processes.
- Actions before the Paris Judicial Court and before the Unified Patent Court.
The supplementary protection certificate
For an active ingredient protected by a basic patent and authorised as a medicinal product, the SPC extends protection beyond the expiry of the patent. Its duration equals the period between the filing of the patent application and the date of the first marketing authorisation in the Union, reduced by five years, up to a maximum of five years (Regulation (EC) No 469/2009). A six-month extension may be added under a paediatric investigation plan (Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).
Litigation rarely concerns the principle and almost always the conditions: is the product protected by the basic patent within the meaning of the regulation, is the authorisation relied upon really the first for that product, does a combination give rise to a separate certificate. Since 2019, a waiver has also allowed manufacture within the Union during the term of the certificate, for export to third countries and for stockpiling with a view to day-one entry (Regulation (EU) 2019/933).
The Bolar exemption and generic entry
The article L. 613-5 (d) of the Intellectual Property Code excludes from infringement the studies and trials necessary to obtain a marketing authorisation for a medicinal product, together with the acts necessary to carry them out and to obtain that authorisation. The exact scope of the exemption, in particular for suppliers of active ingredients and for acts performed with a view to authorisations outside the Union, remains a field of litigation in its own right. The line runs between preparing market entry, which is lawful, and acts of early marketing, which are not.
Marketing authorisation, price, patent: three distinct sequences
Under Union law, the existence of a patent is not a ground for refusing a marketing authorisation: the health authorities do not consider the patent position. The proprietor therefore cannot block the authorisation. It must go to court. Listing in the register of generic groups, and then pricing and reimbursement decisions, follow their own logic and their own remedies before the administrative courts. Coordinating these three sequences, none of which waits for the others, is the essence of the work.
Launch at risk, and the response to it
A generics company that enters the market before the title expires takes a calculated risk. A proprietor that obtains a preliminary injunction against a product ultimately held not to infringe takes another: that of compensating the loss caused by an unjustified prohibition. The provisional measures are therefore prepared on both sides well before the expiry date: technical file, quantified guarantees, mapping of stocks and markets and, for the entrant, early preparation of the grounds of revocation arguments that will serve in defence.
A few matters that illustrate our practice
Generic medicines: SPC litigation
Involvement in supplementary protection certificate litigation for a generic medicines manufacturer, concerning a combination of active ingredients. Work on the challenge to the title and the applications for preliminary injunctions.
Pharmaceuticals: preparing the defence before launch
Involvement in preparing an interim defence for a generic medicines manufacturer in the context of a launch in France. Analysis of a patent covering a dosage regimen, of insufficiency and inventive step arguments, and of the decisions handed down in parallel foreign proceedings.
Analyses and publications to go further
- The launch letter before the UPC: preventing urgency for generics and biosimilars , analysis by the firm.
- Plausibility and the right of priority: the French courts and apixaban , analysis by the firm.
- Matthieu Dhenne, The Santen judgment: the end of the beginning for the protection of new treatments in Europe?, Propriétés intellectuelles, bibliographic notice. Notice bibliographique.
- Droit des brevets (patent law treatise), LexisNexis, 2024.
Frequently asked questions
Why is the launch timetable decisive?
Expiry of titles, SPCs, indications and preparatory acts must be read together. Launch communications may also affect an application for provisional measures.
Does the firm act for originators and for generics companies?
The firm examines titles, evidence and the measures sought for claimants and defendants alike, after a conflict check.
Do regulatory questions and infringement follow the same reasoning?
No. The authorisation of the medicinal product, regulatory exclusivities and patent rights have distinct objects and timetables, which must be coordinated in order to assess a market entry.
Discuss your matter
A certificate expiry to prepare for, an announced generic entry, an injunction to obtain or to resist: the useful window is counted in weeks, rarely in months.