Permanent injunction

Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Permanent injunction" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.

Find a decision in three steps

  1. 1. SearchEnter a party name, case number or keyword.
  2. 2. RefineUse the filters to refine your search, then select Filter.
  3. 3. ReadOpen a title. The “Decision with commentary” badge identifies a case note by the firm.
Scope, method and reading key

UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.

2 decisions recorded

Align Technology v Angelalign (CFI, 16 October 2026)

16 October 2026 CFI / Paris (FR) Local Division / Infringement Action Decision with commentary

In a decision on the merits of 16 October 2026 (UPC_CFI_684/2025 and UPC_CFI_2279/2025), the Paris Local Division upheld Align Technology’s unitary patent EP 2 237 738 B1 on orthodontic repositioning appliances and found literal infringement of claims 1, 4, 5, 7 and…

Read the analysis

Robert Bosch v OWIM (CFI, UPC_CFI_565/2025, 31 July 2026)

31 July 2026 CFI / Mannheim (DE) Local Division / Counterclaim for revocation Decision with commentary

In a decision of 31 July 2026, published on 3 November 2026 (UPC_CFI_565/2025 and UPC_CFI_841/2025), the Mannheim Local Division largely upholds Robert Bosch’s action against OWIM, maker of the Parkside brand, and three companies of the Lidl group.

Read the analysis