Decisions of the Unified Patent Court recorded under "Enforcement" in UPC Litigation Watch, the case law database maintained by Dhenne Avocats.
Find a decision in three steps
1. SearchEnter a party name, case number or keyword.
2. RefineUse the filters to refine your search, then select Filter.
3. ReadOpen a title. The “Decision with commentary” badge identifies a case note by the firm.
Scope, method and reading key
UPC decisions and orders since 1 June 2023. “Decision with commentary” means the entry contains an analysis by Dhenne Avocats. “Summary available” identifies a summary; “Reference” identifies a record without a detailed case note. Open the entry for the source and, where available, the facts, reasoning and practical implications. The official decision is authoritative.
Advanced search
Combinable filters, search within the records or the full text of the decisions, copy reference, selection and export. The keyword and reference search above remains available.
Favourites are kept in this browser only.
Compare two parties or two issues
Coverage actually indexed: 2524 records out of 2524, full text available for 2349 decisions (official PDFs extracted), 0 pending, 32 requiring optical recognition, 126 without a PDF. A search within decision text covers only extracted documents and is not exhaustive. Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus, counts are neither market shares nor success rates.
4 December 2025CFI / Milan (IT) Central Division- Section / Application RoP262ADecision with commentary
The Milan Central Division ordered EOFLOW to pay a penalty of EUR 150,000 for violating the preliminary injunction granted by the Court of Appeal on 30 April 2025, on the basis of evidence that EOFLOW had exported 11,520 insulin pump devices to…
17 September 2025CFI / The Hague (NL) Local Division / Notice of intention to enforce (RoP118.8)Decision with commentary
By an order of 17 September 2025 (UPC_CFI_479/2025, ORD_36945/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Hague Local Division recorded the intention of Washtower IP and Washtower to enforce parts I.B, I.C, II, IV and V of the provisional measures order of 11 September 2025…
3 June 2025CFI / Mannheim (DE) Local Division / Notice of intention to enforce (RoP118.8)Decision with commentary
The presiding judge of the Mannheim Local Division, acting as judge rapporteur, rejected FUJIFILM's request for a warning to Kodak that, failing compliance within three weeks with the information orders in the decision of 2 April 2025 (EP 3 511 174), a…