Volkswagen v Network System Technologies (CoA, ORD_29903/2024, 22 May 2024)
| Date | 22 May 2024 |
|---|---|
| Court | CoA |
| Division | Luxembourg (LU) |
| Type of action | Generic application |
| Registry reference | App_29005/2024 · ORD_29903/2024 |
| Parties | Volkswagen AG |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By order of 22 May 2024 (UPC_CoA_218/2024, APL_25922/2024, App_29005/2024), the Court of Appeal (second panel) rejected Volkswagen’s request to expedite its appeal against the Munich Local Division’s order of 23 April 2024 dismissing its application for security for costs in Network System Technologies’ (NST) infringement action on EP 1 875 683. Volkswagen relied on defence costs already incurred without security and still rising. The Court found no reason in this to shorten the respondent’s time to reply.
Question
Does an appellant that points to the growing cost of a defence conducted without security for costs justify expediting the appeal and shortening time periods under Rules 225(e) and 9.3(b) RoP?
Decision
The request is admissible and NST need not be heard (paragraphs 1 and 2). The respondent has 15 days from service of the statement of grounds of appeal to respond (Rules 235 and 224.2(b) RoP), and Rule 9.3(b) RoP allows a time period to be shortened only on a reasoned request (paragraphs 3 and 4). Volkswagen, which made the request with its statement of appeal 15 days after the impugned order was signed, did not explain why NST’s response was needed before that period expires. Having regard to NST’s interests and the principles of proportionality, fairness and equity, there is no reason to shorten it (paragraphs 5 and 6). As to the rest of the proceedings, the request is too unspecified and insufficiently substantiated (paragraph 7).
Key points for practice
- Practical point: the cost of defending the merits, even without security, is not in itself enough to have an appeal expedited, the appellant must show how each ordinary time period would harm its interests.
Provisions applied
- Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
- Art. 69(4)
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 9.3(b), 158.1, 224.2(b), 225(e) and 235
Related decisions
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: UPC Court of Appeal.
Dhenne Avocats blog: UPC Appeals: What the Numbers Show.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
Parties
- claimantVolkswagen AG18 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Generic application
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La cour d'appel rejette la demande d'accélération de l'appel formée par Volkswagen, la demande n'expliquant pas pourquoi le délai de réponse de NST devrait être abrégé.
- Appeal
- Decision of the Court of Appeal.
- Instance
- Court of Appeal decision.
Patents mentioned
EP 1 875 683mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patentEP 1 552 669mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patentEP 1 552 399mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Texas Instruments v Network Systems Technologies (CoA, ORD_29608/2024, 22 May 2024) cited in this record
- Volkswagen v Network System Technologies (CoA, ORD_29914/2024, 22 May 2024) cited in this record
- Volkswagen v Network System Technologies (CoA, ORD_29926/2024, 22 May 2024) cited in this record
- Volkswagen v Network System Technologies (CFI, ORD_12237/2024, 8 May 2024) cites this decision
Patents and standards
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.