Valeo Electrification v Magna PT (CFI, 26 July 2024)
| Date | 26 July 2024 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Amend Document |
| Registry reference | App_42088/2024 · ORD_42132/2024 |
| Parties | Valeo Electrification |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By order of 26 July 2024 (UPC_CFI_347/2024, ACT_37931/2024, App_42088/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division granted Valeo Electrification leave under Rule 263 RoP to change the claim in its application for provisional measures of 1 July 2024 against three Magna group companies based on EP 3 320 602: the feature of claim 6, previously relied on « alternatively », becomes cumulative.
Question
Does Rule 263 RoP apply to an application for provisional measures, and must an unconditional limitation of the claim be justified?
Decision
The explanation required by the second sentence of Rule 263.1 RoP as to why the change was not included in the original pleading may be dispensable for an unconditional limitation (Rule 263.3 RoP), where the basis for the limitation was laid in advance by an auxiliary request and the earlier submissions can still be used. Rule 263.3 RoP is not confined to proceedings on the merits: its partial reference to an « action » is no obstacle, since the wording of the rule is not uniform, and the rule sits among the general procedural provisions, which also apply to provisional measures. The defendants suffer no undue prejudice: adding the feature narrows the scope of the injunction sought, which is to their advantage, and the feature, already relied on in the original application, had to be taken into account in their defence despite tight deadlines. This is not an amendment of the patent within the meaning of Rules 30 or 50.2 RoP.
Key points for practice
- Practical point: an applicant for provisional measures may narrow its claim during the proceedings by making cumulative a feature relied on in the alternative, without particular justification where the basis was already in its application.
Provisions applied
- Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
- Art. 62
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 30, 50.2, 263.1 and 263.3
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: Written procedure (UPC), Court fees and costs (UPC).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
Parties
- claimantValeo Electrification18 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Amend Document
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- Valeo est autorisée à rendre cumulative, dans sa demande de mesures provisoires, la caractéristique de la revendication 6 jusque-là invoquée à titre alternatif.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 3 320 602mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 3 320 602Rotary electric machine provided with a reservoir of lubricant for lubricating a rolling bearing and for cooling the machine recorded proprietor: Valeo Equipements Electriques Moteur SAS | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 11 other decision(s): Valeo Electrification v Magna PT (CFI, ORD_56545/2024, 31 October 2024 · Valeo Electrification v Magna PT (CoA, ORD_68769/2024, 13 January 2025 · Valeo Electrification v Magna PT (CFI, ORD_68626/2024, 10 January 2025 · Valeo Electrification v Magna PT (CFI, 12 December 2024) · Magna International France v Valeo Electrification (CoA, 11 December 2 · Magna PT v Valeo Electrification (CoA, 21 November 2024) · Valeo Electrification v Magna PT (CFI, ORD_60265/2024, 20 November 202 · Magna International France v Valeo Electrification (CoA, 14 November 2 | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet · European Patent Register existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically) mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.