Opens in a new tab

*** v PROGRESS MASCHINEN & AUTOMATIO (CFI, 4 December 2023)

Date4 December 2023
CourtCFI
DivisionMilan (IT) Local Division
Type of actionApplication RoP262.1 (b)
Case number(s)UPC_CFI_287/2023
Registry referenceApp_584786/2023 · ORD_584786/2023 · UPC_CFI_287/2023
Parties*** v. PROGRESS MASCHINEN & AUTOMATION AG, AWMS.R.L., SCHNELL S.P.A.

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source
Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language
not recorded
Translation available
no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked
not recorded
Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

  • UPC_CFI_287/2023 official number

Follow this case

Parties

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

  1. 4 December 2023 A v Progress Maschinen & Automation (CFI, 4 December 2023) Application RoP262.1 (b) · UPC_CFI_287/2023

    Le tiers obtient l'accès à la demande de conservation des preuves et d'inspection après occultation des données personnelles. Il n'y a pas lieu de statuer sur l'ordonnance déjà publiée.

  2. 4 December 2023 *** v PROGRESS MASCHINEN & AUTOMATIO (CFI, 4 December 2023) Application RoP262.1 (b) · UPC_CFI_287/2023
  3. 23 July 2024 Progress Maschinen & Automation v AWM (CoA, 23 July 2024) Appeal RoP220.1 · appeal, first-instance number cited in the decision

    La cour d'appel annule l'ordonnance de Milan : la demande de mesures emporte demande de communication du rapport d'expert, après audition de la partie visée, et le délai pour agir au fond ne court qu'à compter de la communication ou d'un refus définitif.

What the record states

Nature of the act
Application RoP262.1 (b)
Appeal
An appeal is documented in the corpus (see above).
Instance
First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.

Follow

Weekly summary, on Fridays.