UPM-Kymmene v International N&H Denmark (CFI, 21 November 2025)

Date	21 November 2025
Court	CFI
Division	Munich (DE) Central Division - Section
Type of action	Revocation Action
Case number(s)	UPC_CFI_829/2024
Registry reference	UPC_CFI_829/2024
Parties	UPM-Kymmene Oyi v. International N&H Denmark

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

24 February 2026 : UPM Kymmene v International N&H Denmark (CFI, 24 February 2026) UPC_CFI_829/2024

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CFI_829/2024 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantUPM-Kymmene OyiFollow this party
defendantInternational N&H DenmarkFollow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

21 November 2025 UPM-Kymmene v International N&H Denmark (CFI, 21 November 2025) Revocation Action · UPC_CFI_829/2024
24 February 2026 UPM Kymmene v International N&H Denmark (CFI, 24 February 2026) Revocation Action · UPC_CFI_829/2024
La division centrale annule en totalité le brevet EP 2 611 800 pour extension au-delà de la demande initiale et défaut d'activité inventive, refuse les requêtes subsidiaires tardives et met les frais à la charge du titulaire.

What the record states

Nature of the act: Revocation Action
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary): La valeur du litige est fixée à 1 000 000 euros, la défenderesse doit confirmer ses demandes avant le 28 novembre 2025 et l'audience du 15 janvier 2026 est confirmée.
Appeal: No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Patents mentioned

EP 2 611 800 mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent

Related decisions cited in the analyses

UPM Kymmene v International N&H Denmark (CFI, 24 February 2026) cited in this record

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Patents and standards

Publication	Role in the dispute	Family	Standard and declaration	Pool	Sources
`EP 2 611 800`	Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 3 other decision(s): UPM Kymmene v International N&H Denmark (CFI, 24 February 2026) · UPM-Kymmene v International N&H Denmark (CFI, 4 August 2025) · UPM-Kymmene v Virdia (CFI, 28 February 2025)	not recorded	not recorded	not recorded	Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis

The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.