Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 25 August 2023)
| Date | 25 August 2023 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Munich (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Infringement Action |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CFI_52/2023 |
| Registry reference | ORD_567008/2023 · UPC_CFI_52/2023 |
| Parties | Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE, Tesla Germany u.a. v. Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By provisional order of 25 August 2023 (UPC_CFI_52/2023, ACT_462984/2023, application 566218/2023), the presiding judge and judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division, on an application by Tesla Germany and Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg to extend the time limit for the defence in Avago Technologies International Sales’ infringement action on EP 1838002, fixed the date of service of the statement of claim at 17 July 2023 for both defendants and set a short exchange of comments on the extension, without yet ruling on it. The order is of interest for its method of calculating postal service.
Question
How is the deemed date of service of a statement of claim sent by post determined under Rule 271.6(b) RoP?
Decision
The documents were handed to the post office of the Munich Higher Regional Court on 5 July 2023. Under the division’s settled practice, handover to the postal service is assumed to take place two days later, on 7 July 2023, and service is deemed effected on the tenth day after that, on 17 July 2023, even though the documents were actually received on 10 and 11 July. The time limit for a preliminary objection expired on 17 August 2023, the unextended time limit for the defence would expire on 17 October 2023. The claimant may comment by 30 August and the defendants by 31 August 2023.
Key points for practice
- Practical point: for postal service, the Munich Local Division applies a deemed date that may fall after actual receipt, which lengthens the defendant’s time limits accordingly.
Provisions applied
- Rules of Procedure
- Rule 271.6(b)
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: Patent infringement action.
Publications by Matthieu Dhenne: Pleading the Long Arm: What a UPC Statement of Claim Must Carry Beyond Jurisdiction (Kluwer Patent Blog).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- defendantAvago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited28 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantTesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE15 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantTesla Germany u.aFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Infringement Action
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- Le juge rapporteur fixe au 17 juillet 2023 la date de signification présumée pour les deux défenderesses, en présumant la remise à la poste deux jours après le dépôt au service postal du tribunal, et réserve la décision sur la prorogation.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 1 838 002mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Pfizer v GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals (CFI, 3 December 2024) cites this decision
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 1 838 002Programmable hybrid transmitter recorded proprietor: Broadcom Corp | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 7 other decision(s): Avago International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 30 August 2024) · Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 27 Januar · Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 23 Decemb · Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 16 June 2 · Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 6 June 20 · Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 4 June 20 · Avago Technologies International Sales v Tesla Germany (CFI, 3 April 2 | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet · European Patent Register existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically) mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.