SSAB Europe v Tiroler Rohre (CFI, ORD_68941/2024, 10 February 2025)
| Date | 10 February 2025 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Munich (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Application For Costs |
| Registry reference | ACT_59020/2024 · ORD_68941/2024 |
| Parties | SSAB Europe Oy, SSAB Swedish Steel GmbH v. Tiroler Rohre GmbH |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By a decision of 10 February 2025 (UPC_CFI_640/2024, ACT_59020/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (Judge Pichlmaier) set at EUR 84,033.76 the first-instance costs that Tiroler Rohre must reimburse to SSAB Swedish Steel and SSAB Europe Oy by 15 March 2025, following the withdrawal of its application for provisional measures after the oral hearing. SSAB had claimed EUR 91,568.76. The decision sets out a method for reviewing cost statements that is useful to both sides.
Question
Which representation costs are recoverable under Art. 69(1) UPCA and Rule 152.1, and what is required of the party challenging them?
Decision
The amount claimed was below the EUR 200,000 ceiling applicable to a value in dispute set at EUR 1,200,000. Requiring written evidence is at the rapporteur’s discretion (Rule 156.1): there is no general duty to itemise and prove fees (section 4). Instructing one attorney-at-law and two patent attorneys was accepted. Several time entries were reduced and duplicates struck out. Blanket objections, with an alternative request to cut the costs to one third, could not be reviewed (section 6). No provision allowed the EUR 1,500 incurred by Tiroler Rohre in responding to the application to be shifted to the applicants (section 7).
Key points for practice
- A party opposing a cost statement itemised by task and time must challenge each entry with reasons. A general objection fails.
- Practical point: a statement broken down by activity and hours may suffice without supporting documents, provided it is plausible.
Provisions applied
- Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
- Art. 48(3), Art. 69(1) and Art. 82
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 118.8, 151(d), 152.1, 156.1, 158.2, 221, 354 and 355.4
- Statute of the Court
- Art. 37(2)
Related decisions
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Decisions in the same proceedings
Going further
Lexicon: Court fees and costs (UPC).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
Parties
- defendantTiroler Rohre GmbH5 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantSSAB Swedish Steel GmbH4 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantSSAB Europe Oy4 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Application For Costs
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- Le juge rapporteur fixe à 84 033,76 euros les frais remboursables par Tiroler Rohre, en réduisant certains postes et en écartant les critiques globales ainsi que les frais exposés pour répondre à la demande.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Tiroler Rohre v SSAB Swedish Steel (CoA, 3 July 2025) cited in this record
- SSAB Europe v Tiroler Rohre (CFI, ORD_65844/2024, 10 February 2025) cited in this record
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.