Headwater Research v Samsung Electronics (CFI, 2 October 2024)
| Date | 2 October 2024 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Munich (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Generic application |
| Registry reference | App_40280/2024 · ORD_45269/2024 |
| Parties | Samsung Electronics GmbH |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By order of 2 October 2024 (UPC_CFI_54/2024, ACT_7603/2024, ORD_45269/2024, App_40280/2024), the judge-rapporteur of the Munich Local Division (panel 1, M. Zigann) ordered Headwater Research to provide, within three weeks, security for costs of EUR 100,000 by deposit into the UPC account, in favour of the Samsung companies defending the infringement action on EP 2 391 947. The order promptly applies the test recently laid down by the Court of Appeal for patent enforcement entities.
Question
Must a US company whose only assets are its patents provide security for costs under Art. 69(4) UPCA and Rule 158 RoP, and in what form?
Decision
The judge adopts the Court of Appeal’s test: the claimant’s financial position must give rise to a legitimate and real concern that a costs order may not be recoverable, the parties’ relative positions are not a criterion as such, particularly where the limited funding of a special purpose entity is a deliberate business choice (paragraph 1). Headwater, described as a non-practising entity with no assets other than its patents, did not substantively challenge the defendants’ submissions, its list of European patents saying nothing about their value (paragraph 3). A guarantee from a US bank is not considered adequate. As the defendants gave no costs estimate, only the amount acknowledged by the claimant is ordered (paragraph 4). Failing security, a decision by default may be given (Rule 355 RoP).
Key points for practice
- Practical point: a defendant seeking security should quantify its expected costs, or the amount may be limited to what the claimant concedes.
Provisions applied
- Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
- Art. 69(4)
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 102.2, 158, 333 and 355
- Case law cited
- Court of Appeal, 17 September 2024, UPC_CoA_217/2024, UPC_CoA_219/2024 and UPC_CoA_221/2024
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: Written procedure (UPC), Court fees and costs (UPC).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
Parties
- claimantSamsung Electronics GmbH21 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Generic application
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- Le juge rapporteur ordonne à Headwater Research de déposer 100 000 euros à titre de garantie pour frais dans les trois semaines et rejette les autres demandes.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 2 391 947mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 2 391 947Verifiable device assisted service policy implementation recorded proprietor: Headwater Partners I LLC | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 6 other decision(s): Headwater Research v Samsung Electronics (CFI, 1 August 2025) · Headwater Research v Samsung Electronics (CFI, 12 June 2024) · Headwater Research v Samsung Electronics (CFI, 1 April 2025) · Headwater Research v Samsung Electronics (CFI, 3 March 2025) · Headwater Research v Samsung Electronics (CFI, 24 January 2025) · Headwater Research v Samsung Electronics (CFI, 12 November 2024) | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet · European Patent Register existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically) mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.