OTEC Präzisionsfinish v STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE (CFI, 17 November 2025)
| Date | 17 November 2025 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Application for an Order for inspection pursuant to RoP199 |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CFI_885/2025 |
| Registry reference | UPC_CFI_885/2025 |
| Parties | OTEC Präzisionsfinish GmbH v. STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE S.L. |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Case timeline
- 22 September 2025 : OTEC Präzisionsfinish v STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE (CFI, 22 September 2025) UPC_CFI_885/2025
- 4 May 2026 : OTEC Präzisionsfinish v STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE (CFI, 4 May 2026) UPC_CFI_885/2025
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By an order of 17 November 2025 (UPC_CFI_885/2025), the judge-rapporteur of the Düsseldorf Local Division released to OTEC Präzisionsfinish and its representatives the unredacted description prepared by the expert after the inspection carried out at STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE’s stand at the EMO trade fair in Hanover (EP 2 983 864). It shows the ordinary sequel to an inspection where the respondent asserts no confidentiality interest, and it restates the time limit for starting the main action.
Question
May the expert’s description and its annexes be disclosed to the applicant itself where the respondent, having been invited to do so, has asserted no confidentiality interest?
Decision
The respondent, invited to assert its interests by 13 November 2025, did not do so. The description and its annexes were therefore disclosed to the applicant and its representatives, and the confidentiality obligation in Section X of the order of 22 September 2025 was lifted as regards the applicant for the facts they contain. The order warns the applicant that the measures will be revoked or cease to have effect unless the main action is brought within 31 calendar days or 20 working days, whichever is longer, running from the upload of the order to the CMS (Art. 60(8) UPCA, Rules 198.1 and 199.2). The results may be used only in the main proceedings against the respondent (Rules 196.2 and 199.2).
Key points for practice
- A respondent’s silence when invited to claim confidentiality over the inspection report opens the way to full disclosure to the applicant itself.
- The time limit for the main action runs from the upload of the disclosure order and should be diarised from that moment.
Provisions applied
- Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
- Art. 60(8)
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 194, 196, 197, 198.1 and 199
- Case law cited
- Progress Maschinen & Automation v AWM, Court of Appeal, 23 July 2024, OTEC v Steros, Düsseldorf Local Division, 12 May 2025 (UPC_CFI_260/2025)
Related decisions
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Decisions in the same proceedings
Going further
Lexicon: Order to preserve evidence (UPC).
Publications by Matthieu Dhenne: Evidence Before Argument: The French Weapon Foreign Patent Holders Forget (Kluwer Patent Blog).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- claimantOTEC Präzisionsfinish GmbH11 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantSTEROS GPA INNOVATIVE S.L7 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
- 22 September 2025 OTEC Präzisionsfinish v STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE (CFI, 22 September 2025) Application for an Order for inspection pursuant to RoP199 · UPC_CFI_885/2025
La division ordonne sans audition préalable l'inspection active d'une machine exposée au salon EMO, avec mise en fonctionnement et mesures par un expert, sous confidentialité et sans garantie, et rejette la saisie en tout autre lieu.
- 17 November 2025 OTEC Präzisionsfinish v STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE (CFI, 17 November 2025) Application for an Order for inspection pursuant to RoP199 · UPC_CFI_885/2025
- 4 May 2026 OTEC Präzisionsfinish v STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE (CFI, 4 May 2026) Generic Order · UPC_CFI_885/2025
Faute d'action au fond dans le délai ouvert par la communication de la description détaillée, l'ordonnance d'inspection est levée avec restitution et destruction des preuves, les frais étant mis à la charge d'OTEC. La demande d'indemnisation est rejetée.
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Application for an Order for inspection pursuant to RoP199
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- Faute pour le défendeur d'avoir invoqué un intérêt de confidentialité, la description de l'expert est communiquée intégralement au requérant, la confidentialité est levée à son égard et le délai pour agir au fond est rappelé.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 2 983 864mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- OTEC Präzisionsfinish v STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE (CFI, 4 May 2026) cited in this record
- OTEC Präzisionsfinish v STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE (CFI, 22 September 2025) cited in this record
- Progress Maschinen & Automation v AWM (CoA, 23 July 2024) cited in this record
- Van Loon Beheer Nederland v Inverquark Deutschland (CFI, 23 January 2026) cites this decision
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 2 983 864 | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 6 other decision(s): OTEC Präzisionsfinish v ANCA Europe (CFI, 4 August 2026) · OTEC Präzisionsfinish v ANCA Europe (CFI, 2 July 2026) · OTEC Präzisionsfinish v ANCA Europe (CFI, 6 May 2026) · OTEC Präzisionsfinish v STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE (CFI, 4 May 2026) · OTEC Präzisionsfinish v STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE (CFI, 22 September 2025) · OTEC Präzisionsfinish v STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE (CFI, 26 March 2025) | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.