Ortovox Sportartikel v Mammut Sports Group (CFI, 24 January 2024)

Date	24 January 2024
Court	CFI
Division	Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division
Type of action	Application for provisional measures
Case number(s)	UPC_CFI_452/2023
Registry reference	ORD_4016/2024 · UPC_CFI_452/2023
Parties	Ortovox Sportartikel GmbH v. Mammut Sports Group AG, Mammut Sports Group GmbH

Summary pending review. Official UPC registry metadata imported on 24 September 2026.

Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry

Case timeline

11 December 2023 : Ortovox Sportartikel v Mammut Sports Group (CFI, 11 December 2023) ORD_592936/2023 · UPC_CFI_452/2023
25 January 2024 : Ortovox Sportartikel v Mammut Sports Group (CFI, 25 January 2024) ORD_3347/2024 · UPC_CFI_452/2023

Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.

Contact the firm

English summary awaiting review. Read the French case note.

Source and translations

Official source: Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
Original language: not recorded
Translation available: no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
Date checked: not recorded

Only the official text is authoritative. A machine translation is never presented as official, republishing a third-party document requires a verified basis in rights, and a link to the source is preferred.

Follow this case

Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.

Proceedings

UPC_CFI_452/2023 official number

Follow this case

Parties

claimantOrtovox Sportartikel GmbH14 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantMammut Sports Group AG13 decisions in the corpus Follow this party
defendantMammut Sports Group GmbH13 decisions in the corpus Follow this party

Exact name as it appears in the record, group affiliation only where sourced and dated.

Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals

11 December 2023 Ortovox Sportartikel v Mammut Sports Group (CFI, 11 December 2023) Application for provisional measures · UPC_CFI_452/2023
Les mesures provisoires sont accordées ex parte : interdiction du Barryvox S2 en Allemagne et en Autriche sous astreinte, remise des appareils à un huissier, exécution subordonnée à une garantie de 500 000 euros.
24 January 2024 Ortovox Sportartikel v Mammut Sports Group (CFI, 24 January 2024) Application for provisional measures · UPC_CFI_452/2023
25 January 2024 Ortovox Sportartikel v Mammut Sports Group (CFI, 25 January 2024) Application for provisional measures · UPC_CFI_452/2023
La formation saisie du réexamen d'une ordonnance ex parte demande l'adjonction d'un juge techniquement qualifié, l'article 8, paragraphe 5, de l'Accord le permettant aussi en référé.

What the record states

Nature of the act: Application for provisional measures
Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary): Les défenderesses doivent déposer à nouveau leurs demandes de réexamen dans le circuit du CMS prévu pour la règle 212.3, sans effet sur la date de réception, et la demanderesse doit répondre dans ces nouveaux circuits.
Appeal: No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
Instance: First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.

Patents mentioned

EP 3 466 498 mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent

Related decisions cited in the analyses

Ortovox Sportartikel v Mammut Sports Group (CFI, 25 January 2024) cited in this record
Ortovox Sportartikel v Mammut Sports Group (CFI, 11 December 2023) cited in this record

Scope: Dhenne Avocats corpus. Registry-based links are marked “official number”; links derived from the analyses are marked as such. An erroneous link can be withdrawn without deleting any record.

Patents and standards

Publication	Role in the dispute	Family	Standard and declaration	Pool	Sources
`EP 3 466 498` Search device for avalanche victims and method for operating a search device for avalanche victims recorded proprietor: Ortovox Sportartikel GmbH	Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 10 other decision(s): Mammut Sports Group v Ortovox Sportartikel (CFI, 14 January 2025) · Ortovox Sportartikel v Mammut Sports Group (CFI, ORD_7954/2025, 22 Apr · Ortovox Sportartikel v Mammut Sports Group (CFI, 30 October 2024) · Ortovox Sportartikel v Mammut Sports Group (CFI, 27 September 2024) · Mammut Sports Group v Ortovox Sportartikel (CoA, ORD_44387/2024, 25 Se · Ortovox Sportartikel v Mammut Sports Group (CFI, 5 August 2024) · Ortovox Sportartikel v Mammut Sports Group (CFI, 15 April 2024) · Mammut Sports Group v Ortovox Sportartikel (CFI, 9 April 2024)	not recorded	not recorded	not recorded	Espacenet · European Patent Register existence and title of the publication checked on 30 October 2026 (Google Patents, Espacenet and Register links are not checked automatically) mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis

The statuses “asserted in litigation”, “declared essential”, “listed by a pool” and “essentiality examined by a court” are distinct and may coexist. Validity, infringement and technical essentiality are different questions. Scope: patents cited in the decisions of the Dhenne Avocats corpus, with no essentiality score or prediction.

Receive an alert

Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.