Oerlikon Textile v Himson Engineering (CFI, 17 December 2024)
| Date | 17 December 2024 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Milan (IT) Local Division |
| Type of action | Infringement Action |
| Registry reference | ACT_549550/2023 · ORD_598537/2023 |
| Parties | Oerlikon Textile GmbH & CO KG v. Himson Engineering Private Limited |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By a procedural order of 17 December 2024 (UPC_CFI_240/2023, ACT_549550/2023), issued after the interim conference, the Milan Local Division organised the close of the interim procedure in Oerlikon Textile GmbH & Co KG’s action for infringement of EP 2145848 against Himson Engineering Private Limited, which counterclaimed for revocation. It restricted the use of two late-filed prior art documents, refused for now the request for information and set the oral hearing for 11 June 2025. Its views remain provisional.
Question
How should late-filed prior art and a request for information on the origin and distribution of the machines be handled before the oral hearing?
Decision
Subject to the final decision, the panel took the view that both the action and the counterclaim concern claim 1 only, and invited Himson to reduce its inventive step attacks (section 2.3). Under the front-loading principle, the late-filed documents DE 042 and US 795 may be considered only in relation to the auxiliary requests. Uncontested witness facts are deemed admitted (Rule 171.2) and the videos were admitted (section 2.4). The request for information was not necessary at this stage, as Himson stated it had neither sold nor distributed the machines in the territory covered. It may be raised in later damages proceedings (section 2.5). The value of the action was set, by agreement, in the bracket up to EUR 2,000,000 (section 2.9).
Key points for practice
- Late-filed prior art may remain usable, but only against the auxiliary requests to amend.
- Practical point: a request for information on distribution channels may be better deferred where marketing in the territory has not been shown.
Provisions applied
- Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
- Art. 54, Art. 60 and Art. 76(6)
- Rules of Procedure
- Preamble (point 3), Rules 30.2, 119, 171.2, 185 and 192 et seq.
- Case law cited
- Paris Central Division, 27 November 2024 (No. 571565/2023)
Related decisions
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Decisions in the same proceedings
Going further
Lexicon: Patent infringement action.
Publications by Matthieu Dhenne: Pleading the Long Arm: What a UPC Statement of Claim Must Carry Beyond Jurisdiction (Kluwer Patent Blog).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
Parties
- claimantOerlikon Textile GmbH & CO KG18 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantHimson Engineering Private Limited10 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Infringement Action
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La division locale de Milan limite l'examen des antériorités tardives aux requêtes subsidiaires, écarte pour l'heure la demande d'informations, fixe la valeur du litige et l'audience au 11 juin 2025.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 2 145 848mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- Oerlikon Textile v Himson Engineering (CFI, 17 September 2024) cited in this record
- Bhagat Textile Engineers v Oerlikon Textile (CFI, 20 February 2025) cites this decision
Patents and standards
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.