OCADO INNOVATION v AUTOSTORE (CFI, UPC_CFI_57/2023, 26 June 2023)
| Date | 26 June 2023 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Milan (IT) Local Division |
| Type of action | Infringement Action |
| Registry reference | ORD_533610_2023 · UPC_CFI_57-2023 |
| Parties | OCADO INNOVATION LIMITED v. AUTOSTORE AS |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By order of 26 June 2023, issued in Italian by the presiding judge and judge-rapporteur of the Milan Local Division in the infringement action UPC_CFI_57/2023 (Ocado Innovation v AutoStore), the Division directed the Registry to serve the Statement of claim on the defendants without copies of the claimant’s exhibits. The order deals with a practical difficulty of the UPC’s first months: paper service of a bulky file on defendants for only one of whom an email address was known.
Question
Must the Registry serve the Statement of claim together with copies of all exhibits, some 2,000 pages on paper for each defendant?
Decision
The claimant, heard by the judge-rapporteur, agreed to service of the originating document without the exhibits. The Division ordered service of the Statement of claim in the manner provided by the Rules of Procedure, without copies of the exhibits, which are listed at pages 47 et seq. of the Statement of claim and summarily described in its body. It relied on economy and efficiency, in full compliance with the right to be heard and with the international conventions on service within and outside the EU. The order has no numbered paragraphs and cites no specific Rule.
Key points for practice
- Practical point: where a bulky file has to be served on paper, the claimant may propose service without exhibits, provided the Statement of claim lists them and describes their content.
Provisions applied
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules of Procedure, no specific Rule
- Other provisions
- international conventions on service of documents, referred to generally
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Decisions in the same proceedings
Going further
Lexicon: Patent infringement action.
Publications by Matthieu Dhenne: Pleading the Long Arm: What a UPC Statement of Claim Must Carry Beyond Jurisdiction (Kluwer Patent Blog).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
Parties
- claimantOCADO INNOVATION LIMITED9 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- defendantAUTOSTORE AS4 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Infringement Action
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La division ordonne au greffe de signifier le mémoire en demande sans copie des pièces, celles-ci étant énumérées et décrites dans le mémoire.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Related decisions cited in the analyses
- OCADO INNOVATION v AUTOSTORE (CFI, UPC_CFI_57/2023, ORD_571090/2023, 26 June 2023) cited in this record
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.