N.V. Nutricia v Nestlé Health Science (Deutschland) (CFI, 30 July 2025)
| Date | 30 July 2025 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Generic application |
| Registry reference | App_6997/2024 · ORD_9832/2024 |
| Parties | N.V. Nutricia |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 10 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By a decision of 30 July 2025 (UPC_CFI_201/2023), the Düsseldorf Local Division (Judges Thomas, presiding, Thom, judge-rapporteur, Agergaard and Hedberg, technically qualified judge), with the defendant’s consent, allowed N.V. Nutricia to withdraw its infringement action against Nestlé Health Science (Deutschland) (EP 2 359 858), declared the counterclaim for revocation disposed of, the patent having meanwhile been finally revoked, and ordered Nutricia to bear the costs of both proceedings. It set the value of the action at EUR 250,000 and that of the counterclaim at EUR 500,000, and ordered reimbursement of 60% of the court fees.
Question
How should the value in dispute be set after a consensual withdrawal, where the parties’ figures differ widely (EUR 1,000,000 and EUR 1,500,000 according to the defendant)?
Decision
Under Rules 22 and 370.6 RoP, the Division takes the parties’ figures into account but assesses the claimant’s objective interest when the action was filed, following the Court of Appeal in Microsoft v Suinno. Where the parties settle out of court, an estimate suffices without a thorough examination of each factor (ground 4(a)). The interest in prohibiting the recommendation or offer of the product for reducing respiratory tract infections in the States covered, given the remaining patent term and estimated turnover, justifies EUR 250,000 (ground 4(b)). The 50% increase for the counterclaim remains appropriate because revocation has erga omnes effect (ground 4(c)).
Key points for practice
- Where the parties settle, the value in dispute is estimated summarily, without detailed inquiry. The value of a counterclaim for revocation carries a 50% uplift.
Provisions applied
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 22, 265.2, 360, 370.6 and 370.9(b)
- Case law cited
- Microsoft v Suinno, Court of Appeal, 23 December 2024 (UPC_CoA_826/2024)
Prepared by Dhenne Avocats from the official decision, consulted on 10 October 2026. The database is updated every week, on Friday. Only the official text is authoritative.
Going further
Lexicon: Written procedure (UPC), Court fees and costs (UPC).
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- not recorded
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Proceedings
Parties
- claimantN.V. Nutricia5 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Generic application
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- Le retrait est autorisé, la demande reconventionnelle déclarée éteinte, les frais mis à la charge de Nutricia. Valeurs fixées à 250 000 et 500 000 euros, 60 % des frais de justice remboursés.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 2 359 858mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 2 359 858 | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 3 other decision(s): N.V. Nutricia v Nestlé Health Science (Deutschland) (CFI, 19 December · Nutricia v Nestlé Health Science (Deutschland) (CFI, 14 December 2023) · N.V. Nutricia v Nestlé Health Science (Deutschland) (CFI, 22 September | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.