Sun Patent Trust v Shenzhen Transsion Holdings (CFI, 23 December 2025)
| Date | 23 December 2025 |
|---|---|
| Court | CFI |
| Division | Mannheim (DE) Local Division |
| Type of action | Infringement Action |
| Case number(s) | UPC_CFI_538/2025 |
| Registry reference | UPC_CFI_538/2025 |
| Parties | NEC Corporation v. Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co, Ltd, et. al. |
| Language | English |
Official decision (PDF) · UPC registry entry
Dhenne Avocats represents claimants and defendants in European patent disputes before the Unified Patent Court, including the Paris divisions.
Dhenne Avocats · 30 October 2026
Our analysis
Summary
By decision of 23 December 2025 the Mannheim Local Division permits Sun Patent Trust to withdraw its action for infringement of EP 2 903 267 against Shenzhen Transsion Holdings and several European distributors, declares the proceedings closed, finds that no cost decision is required, sets the value of the dispute at one million five hundred thousand euros and orders the reimbursement of sixty per cent of the court fees, that is eleven thousand four hundred euros.
Facts and procedure
The action targeted the manufacturer and a series of distributors established in several member states. The represented parties agreed on the withdrawal and each declared that it would bear its own costs. One defendant had not taken part in the proceedings.
The applicable law
Withdrawal is governed by Rule 265 of the Rules of Procedure. The partial reimbursement of court fees rests on Rule 370.11, read with Rule 370.9(b) in the version in force since 1 January 2026, Rule 370.9(e) allowing a lower reimbursement where exceptional circumstances appear.
Question
Could the withdrawal be permitted, and to what extent were the court fees to be reimbursed?
Decision
The withdrawal is permitted in accordance with the common intention of the represented parties. As against the defendant that did not take part, it is permitted because that party showed no interest in the proceedings, and no cost decision is required for it since it plainly incurred no recoverable costs. The proceedings are declared closed, the decision entered on the register, the value of the dispute set at one million five hundred thousand euros and sixty per cent of the court fees, that is eleven thousand four hundred euros, reimbursed to the claimant, the withdrawal having occurred before the closure of the written procedure.
Key points for practice
- Withdrawal is permitted as against a defendant that is not represented where it has shown no interest in the proceedings.
- No cost decision is required where each party that incurred costs agrees to bear its own, and where the absent defendant has plainly incurred none.
- Reimbursement of sixty per cent of the court fees requires withdrawal before the closure of the written procedure, the rule applying to actions predating the amendment in force since 1 January 2026.
- The value of the dispute is set in the closing decision, here one million five hundred thousand euros.
Provisions applied
- Rules of Procedure
- Rules 265, 370.9(b), 370.9(e) and 370.11
Only the official text is authentic.
Going further
Glossary entries : Patent infringement, Unified Patent Court.
Source and translations
- Official source
- Unified Patent Court registry link recorded in the record
- Original language
- English from the language of proceedings
- Translation available
- no translation recorded the firm’s French record is a summary, not a translation
- Date checked
- not recorded
Follow this case
Proceedings, related decisions, appeals, parties and patents as recorded in the registry and in the Dhenne Avocats corpus. Each link states its source.
Parties
- defendantShenzhen Transsion Holdings Co, Ltd, et. al7 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
- claimantNEC Corporation18 decisions in the corpusFollow this party
Decisions in the same proceedings and documented appeals
What the record states
- Nature of the act
- Infringement Action
- Outcome (Dhenne Avocats summary)
- La division locale de Mannheim autorise le désistement, y compris à l’égard d’une défenderesse non représentée faute d’intérêt manifesté, clôt la procédure sans décision sur les frais et ordonne la restitution de 60 % des frais de justice, soit 11 400 euros.
- Appeal
- No appeal documented in the corpus, this does not mean that no appeal was lodged.
- Instance
- First-instance decision, whether it has become final is not recorded.
Patents mentioned
EP 2 903 267mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis Follow this patent
Patents and standards
| Publication | Role in the dispute | Family | Standard and declaration | Pool | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EP 2 903 267 | Mentioned in the analysis (role not qualified) Also mentioned in 2 other decision(s): Sun Patent Trust v Roku (CFI, 19 May 2025) · Sun Patent Trust v Roku (CFI, 18 March 2025) | not recorded | not recorded | not recorded | Espacenet links not checked mentioned in: Dhenne Avocats analysis |
Receive an alert
Weekly summary of new records and substantive updates matching what you follow. Address confirmed by email, unsubscribe at any time, one email per week even where several of your follows match.